Do-Not-Resuscitate 결정의도 관련 연구경향: 텍스트 네트워크분석을 중심으로
Research Trend Analysis of Do-Not-Resuscitate Decision: Based on Text Network Analysis
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify a research trend of studies related to the Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) decision makingprocess in Korea. Methods: Assessing through five computerized databases, 889 studies were reviewed and of these 32 were included. An integrative literature review and text network analysis were applied to examine the research. The keywords from each article’sabstracts were extracted by using a program, KrKwic. Results: The number of studies on DNR decision has been increasing, especiallysince 2011. A descriptive study design (59%) was most commonly used in the research. In relation to factors affecting DNR decision,97% of the studies stated patient factors and 66% stated family factors. ‘Patient’, ‘DNR’, ‘decision’, ‘treatment’, ‘life’, ‘family’ were themajor keywords, and ‘patient’ and ‘care’ were dominant keywords that ranked high in coappearance frequency. Conclusion: Studiesrelated to DNR decision have been increasing, and themes of the studies have also been broader. Further research is required to investigatefactors affecting DNR decision in specific populations such as cancer patients, the elderly, patients with end-stage of chronic diseasesetc. Moreover, a comparative study is necessary to define differences of research trends related to DNR decision making processbetween Korea and other countries.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify a research trend of studies related to the Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) decision makingprocess in Korea. Methods: Assessing through five computerized databases, 889 studies were reviewed and of these 32 were included. An integrative literature review and text network analysis were applied to examine the research. The keywords from each article’sabstracts were extracted by using a program, KrKwic. Results: The number of studies on DNR decision has been increasing, especiallysince 2011. A descriptive study design (59%) was most commonly used in the research. In relation to factors affecting DNR decision,97% of the studies stated patient factors and 66% stated family factors. ‘Patient’, ‘DNR’, ‘decision’, ‘treatment’, ‘life’, ‘family’ were themajor keywords, and ‘patient’ and ‘care’ were dominant keywords that ranked high in coappearance frequency. Conclusion: Studiesrelated to DNR decision have been increasing, and themes of the studies have also been broader. Further research is required to investigatefactors affecting DNR decision in specific populations such as cancer patients, the elderly, patients with end-stage of chronic diseasesetc. Moreover, a comparative study is necessary to define differences of research trends related to DNR decision making processbetween Korea and other countries.
참고문헌 (27)
- Kim SH, "Decision making process in Do-Not-Resuscitate orders for patients with cancer", J of Nursing Query, 13(1), pp.127~143 (2005)
- Lee SB, "A study on a patient’s self-determination right and advance directive in withdrawal of life sustaining treatment", Research Report Series, 2010(30), pp.1~158 (2010)
- 이광하, "한 내과계 중환자실에서 사망한 환자들의 심폐소생술 거절 현황", 대한중환자의학회지, 23(2), pp.84~89 (2008), 대한중환자의학회
- 장지영, "연명치료 중단에 대한 태도 연구 -암환자 가족을 대상으로-", 정신보건과 사회사업, (38), pp.5~30 (2011), 한국정신보건사회복지학회
- 송태준, "한 대학병원 종양내과에서 사망한 환자들의 심폐소생술 금지 지시 결정 요소", 대한내과학회지, 74(4), pp.403~410 (2008), 대한내과학회
- 김명희, "의식 없는 말기환자 가족의 연명치료 중단 결정 경험", 한국호스피스완화의료학회지, 15(3), pp.147~154 (2012), 한국호스피스완화의료학회
- Kwon YC, "Impact of perception of socioeconomic burden on advocacy for patient autonomy in end-of-life decision making: a study of social attitude", Palliat med, 23(1), pp.87~94 (2009)
- 김훈교, "호스피스 병동에서 시행되는 말기 암 환자의 DNR 동의", 한국호스피스완화의료학회지, 7(2), pp.232~237 (2004), 한국호스피스완화의료학회
- Park YO, "Withdrawing of life-sustaining trearment" (2008), Korean Studies Information
- 손덕승, "호스피스병동 말기 암 환자 및 내과의사의 사전의료지시(서)에 대한 인식", 한국호스피스완화의료학회지, 12(1), pp.20~26 (2009), 한국호스피스완화의료학회
- 최영출, "한국행정학의 연구경향 분석: 네트워크 텍스트 분석방법의 적용", 한국행정학보, 45(1), pp.123~139 (2011), 한국행정학회
- 박한우, "한국어의 내용분석을 위한 KrKwic 프로그램의 이해와 적용 : Daum.net에서 제공된 지역혁신에 관한 뉴스를 대상으로", Journal of The Korean Data Analysis Society, 6(5), pp.1377~1387 (2004), 한국자료분석학회
- 박치성, "텍스트 네트워크 분석: 사회적 인식 네트워크(socio-cognitive network) 분석을 통한 정책이해관계자 간 공유된 의미 파악 사례", 정부학연구, 19(2), pp.73~108 (2013), 정부학연구소
- Rivadeneira AW, "Getting our head in the clouds: toward evaluation studies of tagclouds", Proceedings of the CHI 2007, pp.995~998 (2007), ACM
- 류상일, "한국위기관리 연구경향 분석: 언어네트워크방법론을 중심으로", Crisisonomy, 8(3), pp.105~120 (2012), 위기관리 이론과 실천
- 권복규, "우리나라 일부 병원에서 환자, 보호자, 의료진의 연명치료 중지 관련 의사결정에 관한 태도", 한국의료윤리학회지, 13(1), pp.1~16 (2010), 한국의료윤리학회
- Kim ES, "The attitude of the terminally ill cancer patients, the families and medical teams for discontinuation of meaningless life-sustaining treatment and self decision-making", 박사, pp.2011
- 이선라, "Do Not Resuscitate (DNR)와 Advance Directives (AD)에 대한 환자 보호자와 의료인의 인식", 한국호스피스완화의료학회지, 17(2), pp.66~74 (2014), 한국호스피스완화의료학회[DOI]
- 이주연, "암 환자의 심폐소생술 금지(Do-not-resuscitate: DNR)에 대한 인식과 윤리적 태도", Asian Oncology Nursing, 14(1), pp.32~40 (2014), 대한종양간호학회
- 옥정휘, "심폐소생술 금지(Do-Not-Resuscitate)를 결정한 암환자 가족의 경험에 관한 현상학적 연구", 한국의료윤리학회지, 15(1), pp.34~51 (2012), 한국의료윤리학회
- 이혜경, "연명치료중단에 관한 중환자실간호사, 의사 및 중환자가족의 태도 및 인식", 임상간호연구, 16(3), pp.85~98 (2010), 병원간호사회
- Jung YR, "A study of difference in perception of 'Do Not Resuscitate' between medical doctors and relative caregivers for the patient with a advanced disease", 박사, pp.2014
- An AR, "Late discussion about end-of-life care in terminal cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study", pp.2012
- 이윤정, "심폐소생술 금지 결정에 대한 통합적 문헌고찰 : 2010년 이후 국내자료를 중심으로", 생명윤리, 14(2), pp.41~52 (2013), 한국생명윤리학회
- 허대석, "환자의 자기결정권과 사전의료지시서", 대한의사협회지, 52(9), pp.865~870 (2009), 대한의사협회
- Oh DY, "CPR or DNR? end-of-life decision in korean cancer patients: a single center’s experience", Support Care Cancer, 14(2), pp.103~108 (2005)
- 이인영, "안락사 유형별 규범해석과 사회적 인식도", 형사법연구, 20(2), pp.167~200 (2008), 한국형사법학회