본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Beating Earnings Benchmarks Between Equity-Financing and Debt-Financing Firms

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This paper studies on the relation between the firm's financing types and beating earnings thresholds. We classify firms into equity-financing and debt-financing firms. Debt-financing firms are top 25% and equity-financing firms are bottom 25% on the ranking based on debt ratio. We regard firms with high debt ratio as relying on debt and firms with low debt ratio as relying on stock when financing. Earnings thresholds(or earnings benchmarks) are target earnings levels that firms are trying to reach: zero earnings, prior period's earnings, and analysts' earnings forecasts. There have been many studies on beating earnings thresholds but lack of studies regarding the firms' financing types and its relation to beating earnings thresholds. Kwak et al.(2008) demonstrate that firms with high debt ratio are less likely to beat analysts' earnings forecasts. This paper extends Kwak et al.(2008) to profit reporting and earnings increasing as well as earnings forecasts, with quarterly data. This is because quarterly reports have become important to capital market since 2000, and therefore managers have high incentives to beat quarterly earnings thresholds(Song et al., 2008; Park et al., 2007). According to results, equity-financing firms are more likely to beat earnings forecasts and zero earnings than debt-financing firms, and there is no difference for beating prior earnings between the two types of financing firms. In addition, we classify firms into bond-issuers and non bond issuers and compare beating earnings thresholds between the two groups. The results show us that bond issuers are more likely to beat prior earnings than non-bond issuers.

Abstract

This paper studies on the relation between the firm's financing types and beating earnings thresholds. We classify firms into equity-financing and debt-financing firms. Debt-financing firms are top 25% and equity-financing firms are bottom 25% on the ranking based on debt ratio. We regard firms with high debt ratio as relying on debt and firms with low debt ratio as relying on stock when financing. Earnings thresholds(or earnings benchmarks) are target earnings levels that firms are trying to reach: zero earnings, prior period's earnings, and analysts' earnings forecasts. There have been many studies on beating earnings thresholds but lack of studies regarding the firms' financing types and its relation to beating earnings thresholds. Kwak et al.(2008) demonstrate that firms with high debt ratio are less likely to beat analysts' earnings forecasts. This paper extends Kwak et al.(2008) to profit reporting and earnings increasing as well as earnings forecasts, with quarterly data. This is because quarterly reports have become important to capital market since 2000, and therefore managers have high incentives to beat quarterly earnings thresholds(Song et al., 2008; Park et al., 2007). According to results, equity-financing firms are more likely to beat earnings forecasts and zero earnings than debt-financing firms, and there is no difference for beating prior earnings between the two types of financing firms. In addition, we classify firms into bond-issuers and non bond issuers and compare beating earnings thresholds between the two groups. The results show us that bond issuers are more likely to beat prior earnings than non-bond issuers.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. Bartov, E., "The rewards to meeting or beating earnings expectations", Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33, pp.173~204 (2002)
  2. Beaver, W., "An alternative Interpretation of the discontinuity in earnings distributions", Review of Accounting Studies, 12(4), pp.525~556 (2007)
  3. Burgstahler, D., "Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses", Journal of Accounting Economics, 24, pp.99~126 (1997)
  4. Burgstahler, D., "Management of earnings and analysts' forecasts to achieve zero and small positive earnings surprises", Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 33, pp.633~652 (2006)
  5. Brown, L. D., "A temporal analysis of earnings surprises: profits versus losses", Journal of Accounting Research, 39(2), pp.221~241 (2001)
  6. Brown, L. D., "A temporal analysis of quarterly earnings thresholds", The Accounting Review, 80(2), pp.423~440 (2005)
  7. Degeorge, F., "Earnings management to exceed thresholds", Journal of Business, 72(1), pp.1~33 (1999)
  8. Dechow, P., "Why are earnings kinky? An examination of the earnings management explanation", Review of Accounting Studies, 8, pp.355~384 (2003)
  9. Durtschi, C., "Earnings management? The shapes of the frequency distributions of earnings metrics are not evidence Ipso Facto", Journal of Accounting Research, 43(4), pp.557~592 (2005)
  10. Hayn, C., "The information content of losses", Journal of Accounting and Economics, 20, pp.125~153 (1995)
  11. Jiang, "Beating earnings benchmarks and the cost of debt", The Accounting Review, 83, pp.377~416 (2008)
  12. Kahneman, D., "Prospect theory : an analysis of decision under risk", Econometrica, (47), pp.263~291 (1979)
  13. 곽수근, "부채를 통한 자본조달과 재무분석가의 이익예측치 미달회피 경향", 회계ㆍ세무와 감사 연구, 48(48), pp.145~172 (2008), 한국공인회계사회
  14. 박종찬, "4분기와 1~3분기 중간이익의 차별적 특성: 재량적 발생과 이익예측성", 회계학연구, 32(4), pp.91~115 (2007), 한국회계학회
  15. Matsumoto, D., "Management incentives to avoid negative earnings surprise", The Accounting Review, 77, pp.483~514 (2002)
  16. 심호석, "애널리스트 이익예측치 충족: 이익조정과 기대치조정", 회계저널, 20(4), pp.91~121 (2011), 한국회계학회
  17. Skinner, D., "Earnings surprises, growth expectations and stock returns or don’t let an earnings torpedo sink your portfolio", Review of Accounting Studies, 7, pp.289~312 (2002)
  18. 송인만, "분기별 이익조정의 형태: 적자회피와 반전현상", 회계학연구, 33(2), pp.1~28 (2008), 한국회계학회

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)