본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Korea’s Education Enthusiasm during the Modern Transition

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

Education enthusiasm is a social value that stimulates passion for learning. In previous studies on the enthusiasm for education, the succession and disconnection of pre-modern and modern times were debated, but the current mainstream argument seems to be that the two fundamentally differ in character. This paper begins with the premise that intellectual tradition is persistent, even if it is not invariable. The purpose of this paper was to demonstrate from historical sources a likely origin of talent development in the context of intellectual history. This study analyzed the rapid change of the modern transition period by examining literary anthologies (文集) from the late Joseon Dynasty and at newspaper articles in the modern era. In addition, as it spanned both eras, analysis focused on keywords that could reflect each era, connecting the two by presenting a keyword-based framework and comparing the structure across eras. The idea of gohak (苦學) was evaluated through depictions of 'studying diligently even in a poor environment' in both eras. Next, the keywords were extracted by examining the post-war process of gohak (苦學), focusing on the late Joseon literary anthologies (文集) and modern newspaper articles that described examples of gohak (苦學). The results can be summarized into four categories: (material and relative) ① poverty (貧), ② struggle (苦), ③ achievement (成), and ④ enthusiasm (熱). Next, I highlighted the justification for connecting and driving each key word in terms of individual, group, and society. After that, the virtuous cycle of ① poverty (貧) → ② struggle (苦) → ③ achievement (成) → ④ enthusiasm (熱) → (① poverty(貧) → ② struggle (苦)……) was examined. In addition, as a result of searching for the common denominator in values between the late Joseon Dynasty and modern times, the elements of Confucianism were found. Through two types of proof, extraction and horizontal + longitudinal analysis, this study supports the idea that the educational enthusiasm of the late Joseon Dynasty has impacted modern times. However, this study notes differences between the view of poverty (貧) in each era, which is an important factor of success. Intellectuals in the late Joseon Dynasty were in a position to recognize poverty; on the other hand, modern international students were in a position to overcome poverty. The minor ideological differences regarding poverty have significant consequences. The keen sense of poverty as a negative during the modern era spurred pursuit of the goal of economic growth, unlike the situation at the end of the Joseon Dynasty. However, social changes in the modern era made the division between generations inevitable, as society developed differently than in the era where social circles were constant. In terms of ideological stability, Joseon Dynasty values were learned from childhood through filial piety (孝) and affection (慈), and heterogeneous ideologies were suppressed at the community level. However, many historical records suggest that the sense of respect between seniors and subordinates has become thinner in modern times-perhaps a cause of generational conflict today. Historians must now contribute to social integration.

Abstract

Education enthusiasm is a social value that stimulates passion for learning. In previous studies on the enthusiasm for education, the succession and disconnection of pre-modern and modern times were debated, but the current mainstream argument seems to be that the two fundamentally differ in character. This paper begins with the premise that intellectual tradition is persistent, even if it is not invariable. The purpose of this paper was to demonstrate from historical sources a likely origin of talent development in the context of intellectual history. This study analyzed the rapid change of the modern transition period by examining literary anthologies (文集) from the late Joseon Dynasty and at newspaper articles in the modern era. In addition, as it spanned both eras, analysis focused on keywords that could reflect each era, connecting the two by presenting a keyword-based framework and comparing the structure across eras. The idea of gohak (苦學) was evaluated through depictions of 'studying diligently even in a poor environment' in both eras. Next, the keywords were extracted by examining the post-war process of gohak (苦學), focusing on the late Joseon literary anthologies (文集) and modern newspaper articles that described examples of gohak (苦學). The results can be summarized into four categories: (material and relative) ① poverty (貧), ② struggle (苦), ③ achievement (成), and ④ enthusiasm (熱). Next, I highlighted the justification for connecting and driving each key word in terms of individual, group, and society. After that, the virtuous cycle of ① poverty (貧) → ② struggle (苦) → ③ achievement (成) → ④ enthusiasm (熱) → (① poverty(貧) → ② struggle (苦)……) was examined. In addition, as a result of searching for the common denominator in values between the late Joseon Dynasty and modern times, the elements of Confucianism were found. Through two types of proof, extraction and horizontal + longitudinal analysis, this study supports the idea that the educational enthusiasm of the late Joseon Dynasty has impacted modern times. However, this study notes differences between the view of poverty (貧) in each era, which is an important factor of success. Intellectuals in the late Joseon Dynasty were in a position to recognize poverty; on the other hand, modern international students were in a position to overcome poverty. The minor ideological differences regarding poverty have significant consequences. The keen sense of poverty as a negative during the modern era spurred pursuit of the goal of economic growth, unlike the situation at the end of the Joseon Dynasty. However, social changes in the modern era made the division between generations inevitable, as society developed differently than in the era where social circles were constant. In terms of ideological stability, Joseon Dynasty values were learned from childhood through filial piety (孝) and affection (慈), and heterogeneous ideologies were suppressed at the community level. However, many historical records suggest that the sense of respect between seniors and subordinates has become thinner in modern times-perhaps a cause of generational conflict today. Historians must now contribute to social integration.

참고문헌 (67)

  1. "高麗史", ~
  2. "太祖實錄", ~
  3. "太宗實錄", ~
  4. "中宗實錄", ~
  5. "純祖實錄", ~
  6. "高宗實錄", ~
  7. "老子道德經註", ~
  8. "小學集註", ~
  9. "論語集註", ~
  10. "孝經集註", ~
  11. 崔致遠, "桂苑筆耕集", ~
  12. 權攇, "震溟集", ~
  13. 柳致皜, "東林集", ~
  14. 申弼欽, "泉齋集", ~
  15. 崔益鉉, "勉菴集", ~
  16. 李植, "澤堂集", ~
  17. 韓章錫, "眉山集", ~
  18. 申錫愚, "海藏集", ~
  19. 金興洛, "西山集", ~
  20. 朴珪壽, "瓛齋集", ~
  21. 柳壽垣, "迂書", ~
  22. "東亞日報", ~
  23. "朝鮮日報", ~
  24. 고영진, "조선중기 예학사상사" (1995), 한길사
  25. 김두얼, "한국의 산업화와 근대경제성장의 기원, 1953–1965 - 전통설과 새로운 해석 -", 경제발전연구, 22(4), pp.29~68 (2016), 한국경제발전학회[DOI]
  26. 김원도, "일제강점기 조선인 도지사 연구", 박사, pp.2018
  27. 김정렴, "최빈국에서 선진국 문턱까지 : 한국 경제정책 30년사" (2006), 랜덤하우스
  28. 나카바야시 히로카즈, "조선총독부의 교육정책과 동화주의의 변천", 박사, pp.2015
  29. 리우창, "조선왕조에서 신하에게 시호를 내리는 제도에 대하여", 淵民學志, 22 (2014), 연민학회
  30. 박휴용, "학력 개념의 세 층위를 통해 분석한 학벌주의와 교육열", 교육사상연구, 32(3), pp.97~128 (2018), 한국교육사상학회[DOI]
  31. 서근원, "교육열의 의미에 관한 한 해석: 사회적 상황의 변화와 관련해서", 교육인류학연구, 11(1), pp.177~201 (2008), 한국교육인류학회[DOI]
  32. 서울대교육연구소, "한국교육사" (1997), 교육과학사
  33. 서정문, "조선중기의 문집편간과 문파형성", 박사, 국사학, pp.2007
  34. 강창동, "한국의 편집증적 교육열과신분 욕망에 대한 사회사적 고찰", 한국교육학연구, 14(2), pp.5~32 (2008), 안암교육학회
  35. 왕건굉, "1960년대 한국사회의 이농현상과 도시빈민 연구", 박사, pp.2016
  36. 이경준, "産業社會에 있어서 家庭敎育上의 問題와 그 對策方案-現代 韓國社會를 中心으로-", 水産海洋敎育硏究, 10 (1994), 한국수산해양교육학회
  37. 이범직, "韓國中世禮思想硏究" (1991), 一潮閣
  38. 이병주, "草廬 李惟泰의 務實論的 孝思想의 現代的 意味", 박사, 한문교육학과, pp.2022
  39. 이병휴, "양반이란 무엇인가", 한국사시민강좌, 29 (2001), 일조각
  40. 이상철, "한국 경제관료의 일제 식민지 기원설 검토(1950년대~1960년대 전반)", 민주사회와 정책연구, (21), pp.202~247 (2012), 민주사회정책연구원
  41. 이성무, "朝鮮後期 黨爭의 綜合的 檢討" (1992), 韓國精神文化硏究院
  42. 이영춘, "조선시대의 淸白吏 錄選과 淸白吏案", 조선시대사학보, (84), pp.7~41 (2018), 조선시대사학회[DOI]
  43. 이우진, "유학, 죄인인가? 구원자인가? -교육열(敎育熱)과 공부열(工夫熱)-", 한국교육사학, 35(2), pp.19~39 (2013), 한국교육사학회[DOI]
  44. 이종각, "'교육열' 개념의 비교와 재정의", 교육학연구, 41(3), pp.191~214 (2003), 한국교육학회
  45. 이헌창, "한국경제통사" (2012), 해남
  46. 임소정, "호남학회와 춘강 고정주에 대하여 : 신교육운동을 중심으로", 석사, 역사교육, pp.2004
  47. 차장섭, "朝鮮後期閥閱硏究" (1997), 일조각
  48. 최종석, "내재적 발전론 ‘이후’에 대한 몇 가지 고민", 역사와 현실, (100), pp.56~90 (2016), 한국역사연구회
  49. 한국사회경제학회, "한국경제론강의" (1994), 한울아카데미
  50. 동아일보, "米國留學에對하야(一) 在米國崔泳旭(寄)", 동아일보, 1922년 11월 21일자, 1~ (1922)
  51. 동아일보, "苦學으로成功한人", 동아일보, 1923년 03월 07일자, 3~ (1923)
  52. 조선일보, "海外留學에對하야(五)", 조선일보, 1923년 04월 22일자, 1~ (1923)
  53. 동아일보, "北京留學에對하야(下) ◇北京高麗留學生會”, 三, 北京留學과費用 北京留學에 對하야 (下)", 동아일보, 1925년 04월 05일자, 1~ (1925)
  54. 동아일보, "兩班자랑", 동아일보, 1927년 10월 11일자, 1~ (1927)
  55. 동아일보, "留學은 幻夢 鐵窓身勢十年", 동아일보, 1928년 05월 10일자, 5~ (1928)
  56. 동아일보, "學事顧問", 동아일보, 1930년 03월 08일자, 6~ (1930)
  57. 조선일보, "苦學에失敗飮毒한靑年", 조선일보, 1931년 04월 26일자, 7~ (1931)
  58. 조선일보, "尹致昊氏 甲申政變以後 留學時代의追憶 (一)", 조선일보, 1932년 01월 02일, 2~ (1932)
  59. 조선일보, "苦學과自習으로辯護士에登第-平壤金昌日氏", 조선일보, 1933년 09월 12일자, 3~ (1933)
  60. 조선일보, "時代逆行의兩班嗜好癖", 조선일보, 1937년 02월 18일자, 1~ (1937)
  61. 조선일보, "人物로 본 韓國学 人脈 <2>, 歷史의 뒤안길을 엮는 特別連載 槪說", 조선일보, 1969년 01월 14일, 3~ (1969)
  62. 조선일보, "人物로 본 韓國学 人脈 歷史의 뒤안길을 엮는 特別連載 <17> 小白山脈 ③ <求禮, 潭陽, 谷城>", 조선일보, 1969년 04월 29일, 5~ (1969)
  63. 경향신문, "내가 겪은 廿世紀(37) 海峯金衡翼 박사", 경향신문, 1972년 12월 02일자, 4~ (1972)
  64. 동아일보, "수학의 정석은 苦學의 산물…당돌한 젊은 용기로 책 펴내", 동아일보, 2016년 08월 30일자, ~ (2016)
  65. 꼰대세대와 MZ세대, "경기일보, 2022년 07월 18일", 2022
  66. 충청일보, "MZ세대와 소통 논란과 해법을 찾다", 충청일보, 2023년 02월 06일, ~ (2023)
  67. ‘꼰대’라는 세대, "강원도민일보, 2023년 06월 07일", 2023

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)