본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재후보

An Criminological Approach to Explain TERROR and Terrorism

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to explain the causes of terrorism based on criminological perspectives. The existing theory of terrorism has been proposed mainly outside of the academic of criminology such as, politics, economics, sociology, etc. However, terrorism is a deviant act that is no different from ordinary crime. Thus, exist-ing criminology theories can explain terrorism. Especially, in this study, three major criminological theories, such as social disorganization theory, crime opportunity theory, and general strain theory, were discussed. Method: This study sought to achieve its purpose through theoretical comparison. First, this study focused on the discussion of pervious theories proposed by the academic fields outside of criminology. Many theories have been suggested to explain terrorism. In particular, various theories have been suggested in the fields of politics and economics. Typical terrorist theories include violence, international political structural theory, social structural theory, and game theory. Secondly, the author attempted to explain terrorism by applying various theoretical approaches to criminology such as social disorganization, strain, and opportunity perspectives. In order to under-stand terrorism well, it is essential to understand the status of terrorism. Thus, this study tried to analyze the GTD to understand the current status of terrorism from 1790 to 2019. The status analysis showed how often terrorism occurred, where it occurred, and the seasonal changes in the outbreak. Results: As a result of comparative analysis of theory, there was a limitation that the theories proposed in areas other than conventional criminology explained the cause of terrorism centered on political conflict. This has limita-tions in presenting practical policy alternatives. This is because the political problem is very complicated and diffi-cult to solve. Meanwhile, when applying the theory of criminology, the understanding and problem-solving of terrorism were more clear. In the case of strain theory, it has the advantage that it has been able to present a vari-ety of collective tension mitigation measures in a particular region. The theory of social disorganization theory suggests ways to strengthen social control in the concentrated areas of terrorism. The theory that the most effi-cient practical policy proposal is seen as a criminal opportunity theory. The criminal opportunity theory suggests that terrorism can also be prevented through situation control because it is an act that takes opportunities and situations into account. Conclusion: Crime and terrorism are not separate concepts. Terrorism is a sub-concept that belongs to a criminal act. Thus, the theory of criminology can be used to fully explain terrorism. If the cause of terrorism is identified through a criminological approach, more effective alternatives can be proposed. This requires follow-up studies that apply criminology theory in future terrorist studies.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to explain the causes of terrorism based on criminological perspectives. The existing theory of terrorism has been proposed mainly outside of the academic of criminology such as, politics, economics, sociology, etc. However, terrorism is a deviant act that is no different from ordinary crime. Thus, exist-ing criminology theories can explain terrorism. Especially, in this study, three major criminological theories, such as social disorganization theory, crime opportunity theory, and general strain theory, were discussed. Method: This study sought to achieve its purpose through theoretical comparison. First, this study focused on the discussion of pervious theories proposed by the academic fields outside of criminology. Many theories have been suggested to explain terrorism. In particular, various theories have been suggested in the fields of politics and economics. Typical terrorist theories include violence, international political structural theory, social structural theory, and game theory. Secondly, the author attempted to explain terrorism by applying various theoretical approaches to criminology such as social disorganization, strain, and opportunity perspectives. In order to under-stand terrorism well, it is essential to understand the status of terrorism. Thus, this study tried to analyze the GTD to understand the current status of terrorism from 1790 to 2019. The status analysis showed how often terrorism occurred, where it occurred, and the seasonal changes in the outbreak. Results: As a result of comparative analysis of theory, there was a limitation that the theories proposed in areas other than conventional criminology explained the cause of terrorism centered on political conflict. This has limita-tions in presenting practical policy alternatives. This is because the political problem is very complicated and diffi-cult to solve. Meanwhile, when applying the theory of criminology, the understanding and problem-solving of terrorism were more clear. In the case of strain theory, it has the advantage that it has been able to present a vari-ety of collective tension mitigation measures in a particular region. The theory of social disorganization theory suggests ways to strengthen social control in the concentrated areas of terrorism. The theory that the most effi-cient practical policy proposal is seen as a criminal opportunity theory. The criminal opportunity theory suggests that terrorism can also be prevented through situation control because it is an act that takes opportunities and situations into account. Conclusion: Crime and terrorism are not separate concepts. Terrorism is a sub-concept that belongs to a criminal act. Thus, the theory of criminology can be used to fully explain terrorism. If the cause of terrorism is identified through a criminological approach, more effective alternatives can be proposed. This requires follow-up studies that apply criminology theory in future terrorist studies.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. Yun Woo-suk, "Periodical and Spatial Differences of Terrorism Examining Global TERRORISM Database from 1970~2018", International Journal of Terrorism & National Security, 5(1), pp.1~12 (2020), J-INSTITUTE
  2. Cohen LE, "Social Change in Crime Rate of Larceny: A Routine Activity Approach", American Sociological Review, 44, pp.588~608 (1979)
  3. Agnew R., "A General Strain Theory of Terrorism", Theoretical Criminology, 14(2), pp.131~153 (2010)
  4. Turk A., "Sociology of Terrorism", Annual Review of Sociology, 30, pp.271~286 (2004)
  5. Krueger AB, "Education, Poverty and Terrorism: Is There a Causal Connection?", Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(4), pp.119~144 (2003)
  6. Black D., "Terrorism as Social Control: Criminological Perspectives", Sociology of Crime, Law and Deviance, 5, pp.9~18 (2004)
  7. Arce GD, "An Evolutionary Game Approach to Fundamentalism and Conflict", Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 159, pp.132~154 (2003)
  8. Gurr TR, "Ethno-political Rebellion: A Cross-sectional Analysis of the 1980s with Risk Assessments for the 1990s", American Journal of Political Science, 41(4), pp.1079~1103 (1980)
  9. Goodwin J., "A Theory of Categorical Terrorism", Social Forces, 84(4), pp.2027~2046 (2006)
  10. Pape R., "The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism", American Political Science Review, 97, pp.1~19 (2003)
  11. Browning CR, "The Paradox of Social Organization: Networks, Collective Efficacy, and Violent Crime in Urban Neighborhoods", Social Forces, 83(2), pp.503~534 (2004)
  12. Morenoff JD, "Neighborhood Inequality, Collective Efficacy, and the Spatial Dynamics of Urban Violence", Criminology, 39(3), pp.517~559 (2001)
  13. Sampson RJ, "Community Structure and Crime: Testing Social Disorganization Theory", American Journal of Sociology, 94(4), pp.774~802 (1989)
  14. Sampson RJ, "Neighborhoods and Violent Crime: A Multilevel Study of Collective Efficacy", Science, 277, pp.918~924 (1997)
  15. 홍승표, "A Study on the Influence Factors of Suicide TERRORISM", International Journal of Terrorism & National Security, 6(2), pp.26~41 (2021), J-INSTITUTE
  16. 조성택, "A Study on History of CBRN Weapons and New TERRORISM", International Journal of Terrorism & National Security, 5(2), pp.40~47 (2020), J-INSTITUTE
  17. 양승돈, "Review of Trend Analysis of TERRORISM and KOREA's Implications", International Journal of Terrorism & National Security, 5(1), pp.40~47 (2020), J-INSTITUTE
  18. Oh Sei-youen, "Police Countermeasures on the Possibility of TERRORISM Using Drone in South KOREA", International Journal of Terrorism & National Security, 4(2), pp.7~14 (2019), J-INSTITUTE
  19. Choi CH, "Trend of Terrorism" (2014), Good Land
  20. Clarke RV, "Situation Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies" (1997), Harrow and Heston
  21. Cornish DB, "The Reasoning Criminal, Rational Choice Perspectives on Offending" (1997), Springer-verlag
  22. Start, "Global Terrorism Database: Code Book-inclusion Criteria and Variables" (2015)
  23. Choi JT., "Theory and Actual Status of Terrorism" (2006), Daeyoung
  24. Adams J., "The Financing the Terror" (1986), Simon & Schuster
  25. Maleckova K., "Root Causes of Terrorism" (2005), Routledge
  26. Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas, "Shaw CR", University of Chicago, ~ (1942)
  27. Bursik R, "Neighborhoods and Crime: The Dimensions of Effective Community Control" (1993), Lexington Books

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)