본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재후보

Strategic Implications of Belt and Road Initiative for the U.S.-ROK ALLIED RELATIONSHIP

윤익중|주재우
동북아학술저널연합 (Northeast Asian Studies Journal Institute (J-INSTITUTE))|2021.03|International Journal of Terrorism & National Security|제6권 제1호|pp. 53-65

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

ChinaBelt and Road InitiativeIndo-Pacific StrategyThe US-ROK AllianceHegemonic Challenge

초록

Purpose: The ROK’s diplomatic maneuverability since the normalization of its relationship with the PRC in 1992 has received much undeserved skepticism from both Beijing and Washington. While Beijing acquiescently acknowledges the necessity of Seoul to maintain an alliance with Washington, it has become critical of it since the ROK’s decision to deploy THAAD in 2016. The paper aims at a better understanding of US intent and purposes of engaging with China over the years. To this end, it attempts to reveal the underlying intent of China’s Belt and Road Initiative by introducing its military nature and characters. Method: This paper is basically researched using the traditional literature(English and Chinese) search method. In this paper, quantitative research methodology was not applied due to the distrust of the survey results in China. The interaction of China's Belt and Road Initiative for the U.S.-ROK allied relationship was conducted through a traditional literature search method. In the future, this research topic is expected to be studied in a scientific analysis research method with proven objectivity. Results: To overcome the dilemma that it conceives itself to be in the ROK must consider the following. First of all, the ROK must consider some of the following PRC will not change as long as the CCP remains in power and the Party upholds communism. Secondly, the ROK must expand its concept of the alliance to something beyond military cooperation. Opportunities for cooperation in areas other than security are bountiful. It must now overcome the restrictions it has put on itself and think globally with its ally since it can now afford to do so. Conclusion: It concludes that the best viable way to defend ROK’s national interest is by protecting its values and ideology that it has upheld for the time being. ROK’s the dilemma between the U.S. and PRC will transpire into something unprecedented. It can be assured by the way the fourth industry is transforming that it will no longer be an economic market and security dependence. The strongest recommendation at this particular juncture is to check whether we are willing to defend our values and ideology.

Abstract

Purpose: The ROK’s diplomatic maneuverability since the normalization of its relationship with the PRC in 1992 has received much undeserved skepticism from both Beijing and Washington. While Beijing acquiescently acknowledges the necessity of Seoul to maintain an alliance with Washington, it has become critical of it since the ROK’s decision to deploy THAAD in 2016. The paper aims at a better understanding of US intent and purposes of engaging with China over the years. To this end, it attempts to reveal the underlying intent of China’s Belt and Road Initiative by introducing its military nature and characters. Method: This paper is basically researched using the traditional literature(English and Chinese) search method. In this paper, quantitative research methodology was not applied due to the distrust of the survey results in China. The interaction of China's Belt and Road Initiative for the U.S.-ROK allied relationship was conducted through a traditional literature search method. In the future, this research topic is expected to be studied in a scientific analysis research method with proven objectivity. Results: To overcome the dilemma that it conceives itself to be in the ROK must consider the following. First of all, the ROK must consider some of the following PRC will not change as long as the CCP remains in power and the Party upholds communism. Secondly, the ROK must expand its concept of the alliance to something beyond military cooperation. Opportunities for cooperation in areas other than security are bountiful. It must now overcome the restrictions it has put on itself and think globally with its ally since it can now afford to do so. Conclusion: It concludes that the best viable way to defend ROK’s national interest is by protecting its values and ideology that it has upheld for the time being. ROK’s the dilemma between the U.S. and PRC will transpire into something unprecedented. It can be assured by the way the fourth industry is transforming that it will no longer be an economic market and security dependence. The strongest recommendation at this particular juncture is to check whether we are willing to defend our values and ideology.

참고문헌 (57)

  1. 조성구, "PROTECTION SECURITY Organizations of the ROK: A Comparative Study of Presidential Security Service and National Police Agency", International Journal of Military Affairs, 2(1), pp.18~23 (2017), J-INSTITUTE
  2. Waldron A., "The Warlord: Twentieth-century Chinese Understandings of Violence, Militarism, and Imperialism", The American Historical Review, 96(4), pp.1073~1100 (1991)
  3. Son Man-sik, "Response of KOREAN Private Security against North Korean CYBER TERRORISM", Protection Convergence, 2(2), pp.11~14 (2017), J-INSTITUTE
  4. Cho Hong-je, "NORTH KOREA MISSILE: Past, Present and Future", International Journal of Terrorism & National Security, 3(1), pp.1~5 (2018), J-INSTITUTE
  5. 朱锋, "中国的外交斡旋与朝核问题六方会谈 为什么外交解决朝核问题这么难?", 外交评论, 4(1), pp.23~31 (2006)
  6. 何志工, "朝鮮半島和平協定與和平機制", 東北亞論壇, 17(2), pp.30~36 (2008)
  7. Noh Dong-young, "International legal Review on the Withdrawal of UN Forces and USFK in terms of Termination of ARMISTICE Regime of the KOREAN Peninsula", International Journal of Military Affairs, 4(1), pp.1~4 (2019), J-INSTITUTE
  8. 李福兴, "四方会谈’为何难以取得进展", 国际展望, 17(1), pp.7~9 (1999)
  9. Seo Bong-sung, "A Study on the NATIONAL SECURITY Crime in Cyber Space", International Journal of Terrorism & National Security, 4(1), pp.15~19 (2019), J-INSTITUTE
  10. 조성구, "The Policies of South KOREA's Counter Intelligence Agency on North Korea's ESPIONAGE Activities in South Korea", Protection Convergence, 3(2), pp.30~35 (2018), J-INSTITUTE
  11. Doyle M. Kant, "Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs", Philosophy and Public Affairs, 12(3), pp.205~235 (1983)
  12. 怀成波, "怎样理解 国家核心利益?", 红旗文稿, 2(1), pp.38~38 (2011)
  13. Gupta R., "China’s National Interests: Exploring the Domestic Discourse", Strategic Analysis, 32(5), pp.804~818 (2012)
  14. 조성구, "The United Nation's Response Strategy for North KOREA's DENUCLEARIZATION", International Journal of Military Affairs, 3(2), pp.20~28 (2018), J-INSTITUTE
  15. 辛田, "中国海外利益保护私营化初探", 国际展望, 4(1), pp.62~63 (2016)
  16. 孔志国, "中国海外利益转型与一带一路战略", 社会科学前沿, 5(1), pp.144~150 (2016)
  17. 刘海泉, "一带一路 战略的安全挑战与中国的选择", 太平洋学报, 23(2), pp.72~79 (2015)
  18. 周士永, "一带一路 背景下的现代边海防建设", 社科纵横, 31(12), pp.16~18 (2016)
  19. 白永秀, "丝绸之路的纵深背景与地缘战略", 改革, 3(1), pp.64~68 (2014)
  20. Yu Byung-hu, "Transnational Security Threat and Change of COUNTERTERRORISM Intelligence Environment", International Journal of Terrorism & National Security, 4(1), pp.9~14 (2019), J-INSTITUTE
  21. Cho Hong-je, "Current US SPACE Policy and Strategy", International Journal of Military Affairs, 3(1), pp.7~13 (2018), J-INSTITUTE
  22. 赵青海, "四国同盟: 构想与现实", 国际问题研究, 6(1), pp.28~32 (2007)
  23. Jervis R., "The Impact of the Korean War on the Cold War", The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 24(4), pp.563~592 (1980)
  24. 崔丕, "美日對中國硏制核武器的認識與對策(1959-1969)", 世界歷史, 2(1), pp.4~20 (2013)
  25. Koga K., "Japan’s ‘Indo-Pacific’ Question: Countering China or Shaping a New Regional Order?", International Affairs, 96(1), pp.49~73 (2020)
  26. Jervis R., "Perception and Misperception in International Politics", pp.1976
  27. Bradley J., "The China Mirage: The Hidden History of American Disaster in Asia" (2015), Little Brown
  28. Mann J., "About Face: A history of America's Curious Relationship with China from Nixon to Clinton" (2000), Vintage Books
  29. Friedberg A., "A Contest for Supremacy: China, America, and the Struggle for Mastery in Asia" (2011), W. W. Norton & Company
  30. Kant I., "Perpetual Peace and Other Essays" (1992), Hackett
  31. 习近平, "决胜全面建成小康社会, 夺取新时代中国特色社会主义伟大胜利" (2017), 人民出版社
  32. Woodward B., "Fear: Trump in the White House" (2018), Simon & Schuster
  33. 中國國防部, "中国武装力量的多样化运用" (2013), 中华人民共和国国务院新闻办公室
  41. 王毅, "美在韩部署 萨德 系统侵害中国利益", 环球時報, ~ (2015)
  48. "China Passes a New National Security Law. Raises a Concern for Tighter Social Control", The Hangyeoreo, ~ (2015)
  49. Protecting China’s Overseas Interests: The Slow Shift away from Non-interference, "Duchatel M", Sipri Policy, ~ (2014)
  50. 刘静, "中国海外利益保护：海外风险类别与保护手段" (2016), 中国社会科学出版社
  51. 习近平接见第五次全国边海防工作会, "李克强张高丽参加" (2014), 新华社
  52. 中國國防部, "中国的军事战略" (2015), 中华人民共和国国务院新闻办公室
  54. 中国海军护航编队, "11年来护送中外船舶6700余艘次", 解放军报, ~ (2019)
  56. Indo-pacific Strategy Report: Preparedness, Partnerships, and Promoting a Networked Region, "The Department of Defense", DOD, ~ (2019)
  57. Towards Free and Open Indo-pacific: Sailing on the Indo-pacific, "The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan", Finding Opportunities for Prosperity, ~ (2019)

관련 논문AI추천

Changes in U.S. Security and Defense Strategy toward China: Assessment and Policy Implications김기주한국국방연구원 · The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis2020 · 제32권 제4호Changes in U.S. Asia-Pacific Strategy and Implications for South Korea’s National Security under the Post-Cold War Period윤지원, 이재인동북아학술저널연합 · International Journal of Terrorism & National Security2025 · 제10권 제0호Loosening or Tightening the Linchpin? The Effects of China’s Approach to US THAAD Deployment in South Korea조비연국제학연구소 · Journal of International and Area Studies2022 · 제29권 제1호China's Military Rise and the US Strategic Framework for the Indo-Pacific: PROTECTION of ROK's National Interest이상수동북아학술저널연합 · Protection Convergence2021 · 제6권 제1호A Study on the Resilience of the Republic-of-Korea(ROK)-US Alliance in Post-Unipolar World기지윤한국세계지역학회 · 세계지역연구논총2020 · 제38권 제3호A Study on the Overcoming of the Asymmetry of the Korea-U.S. Alliance: Focusing on the Trump Administration’s Security, Economic and MILITARY Alliance PoliciesChoi Won-sang, Moon Hyeon-cheol, Shin Jin동북아학술저널연합 · International Journal of Military Affairs2019 · 제4권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)

A Case Study of AI DEFENSE Applications in Major Northeast Asian States and Strategies for Building a ROK’s AI-based National Defense System이상수pp. 1-13South Korean Government’s CRISIS MANAGEMENT LEADERSHIP: Focusing on the Cases of North Korea’s Second and Sixth Nuclear Tests윤태영pp. 14-23A Study on of Salafi Jihadist Groups: Focusing on BOKO HARAM조성택pp. 24-33Verification of Differences Between the Number of Employees in the Organization and the Service Locations on the Stress of the Korean SECURITY POLICE조성구, 이치영, Seungmin Baekpp. 34-44Pandemic and the Threat of BIOTERRORISMMinkyu Chapp. 45-52
원문 보기