대학부설 과학영재교육원 수학영재 선발과정과 학업성취도의 상관관계
Relationships between the Selection Process and Academic Achievements of Math Gifted Students at a Science Gifted Education Center Affiliated with University
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 연구는 교사 관찰․추천 및 수업관찰에 기반한 2단계 선발과정을 실시한 후, 과학영재교육원의 수학영재 선발과정의 타당성을 검증하고 향후 영재 선발전형을 위한 시사점을 탐색하는 데 목적을 두었다. 이를 위해 수학영재 선발과정의 단계별 평가항목 간 평가점수의 상관관계와, 수학영재의 입학 선발전형 평가점수와 과학영재교육원 재학 중 학업성취도 간의 상관관계를 분석하였다. 연구결과, 선발과정 1단계 서류심사, 2단계 수업관찰의 평가항목별 상관관계는 나타나지 않았다. 반면 최종합격자의 경우는 선발과정 단계별 평가항목별 점수와 과학영재교육원 재학 중 학업성취도와의 상관관계 분석에서 선발과정 1단계 교사추천서는 재학 중 학업성취도와 유의한(p<.05) 상관관계를 나타냈다. 선발과정 2단계 수업관찰의 평가점수는 과학영재교육원 재학 중 학업성취도와 상관관계를 나타내지 않았다. 결론적으로 대학부설 과학영재교육기관의 수학영재 선발과정에서는 교사추천서가 유의한 것으로 고찰되었다.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to verify the validity of the selection process for the gifted in mathematics at a science gifted education center affiliated with university and to explore the implications for the selection of gifted students in the future. Mathematics gifted students were selected by a two-step selection process based on teacher observation and recommendation and classroom observation. The correlation of scores for each evaluation item in each stage of the selection process was examined, and the correlation between the admission scores of the selection process and the academic achievement during enrollment at the science gifted education center was analyzed. As results, there was no correlation between the evaluation items of the first stage of the selection process and the second stage of the class observation, but in the case of the final successful group, the correlation between the scores of each evaluation item in each stage of the selection process and the academic achievement after admission to the science gifted education center. In the relationship analysis, among the evaluation items in the first stage of the selection process, the teacher recommendation letter showed a significant (p<.05) correlation. The evaluation score of the second-stage instructional observation in the selection process did not show a correlation with academic achievement during enrollment at the science gifted education center. In conclusions, it showed that the teacher recommendation letter was one of the significant factors in the selection process for the gifted in mathematics at the science gifted education center affiliated with university.
참고문헌 (24)
- 수학 영재 판별도구 개발 연구(Ⅱ) -검사 제작편-, "김홍원", 한국교육개발원, ~, pp.한국교육개발원연구보고 CR97-50 (1997)
- 류지영, "영재학급 대상자 선발을 위한 관찰․추천 영재판별모형 개발 연구", 영재교육연구, 20(1), pp.257~287 (2010), 한국영재학회
- 송상헌, "수학영재 교육프로그램을 위한 수학적 영재성의 정의와 판별의 이론적 고찰", 대한수학교육학회, 6(2), pp.271~294 (1996)
- 신보미, "수학 영재 관찰 · 추천 도구의 개발과 모의 적용 사례 연구", 영재교육연구, 20(1), pp.31~59 (2010), 한국영재학회
- 신희영, "수학영재교육에서의 관찰평가와 창의력평가", 학교수학, 9(2), pp.241~257 (2007), 대한수학교육학회
- 윤은정, "관찰․추천제에 의한 영재교육대상자 선발에서 심사결과의 신뢰도 및 타당도 분석", 영재교육연구, 22(4), pp.929~942 (2012), 한국영재학회
- 이인호, "영재교육 대상자 선발에서 교사 추천의 효용성 분석", 영재교육연구, 19(2), pp.381~404 (2009), 한국영재학회
- 최은주, "교사추천서와 자기소개서 분석을 통한관찰∙추천제의 영재 판별 효과성 탐색", 과학영재교육, 5(1), pp.22~32 (2013), 한국과학영재교육학회
- Borland, J. H., "Critical issues and practices in gifted education", pp.261~280 (2008), Prufrock Press
- Borland, J. H., "Myth 2: The gifted constitute 3%to 5% of the population: Moreover, giftedness equals high IQ, which is stable measure of aptitude", Gifted Child Quarterly, 53, pp.236~238 (2009)[DOI]
- Brown, S. W., "Assumptions underlying the identification of gifted and talented students", Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, pp.68~79 (2005)
- Callahan, C. M., "Conceptions of giftedness", pp.38~51 (2005), Cambridge University Press
- Ford, D. Y., "Two other wrongs don’t make a right : Sacrificing the needs of diverse students does not solve gifted education’s unresolved problems", Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 26, pp.283~291 (2003)
- Haylock, D., "Recognizing mathematical creativity in schoolchildren", ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematical Education, 29(3), pp.68~74 (1997)
- Keating, D. P., "Mathematical talent: Discovery, description, and development" (1974), Johns Hopkins University Press
- Krutetskii, V. A., "The psychology of mathematical abilities in school children" (1976), The University of Chicago Press
- Leikin, R., "Mathematical creativity in generally gifted and mathematically excelling adolescents: What makes the difference?", ZDM—Mathematics Education, 45(2), pp.183~197 (2013)[DOI]
- NCTM, "Providing opportunities for the mathematically gifted, K-12", NCTM, ~ (1987)
- Renzulli, J. S., "A practical system for identifying gifted and talented students", Early Childhood Development, 63, pp.9~18 (1990)
- Renzulli, J. S., "Conceptions of giftedness", pp.246~270 (2005), Cambridge University Press
- Schroth, S. T., "Identifying gifted students : Educator beliefs regarding various policies, processes, and procedures", Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 32, pp.155~179 (2008)
- Silver, E. A., "Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing", ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematical Education, 29(3), pp.75~80 (1997)
- Sternberg, R. J., "Handbook of gifted education", pp.88~99 (2003), Allyn & Bacon
- Subotnik, R. F., "Creativity in mathematics and the education of gifted students", pp.165~179 (2009), Sense Publishers