본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Accountability and Performance in Public Organizations: An Institutional Perspective and Institutional Design

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Institutional analysis can provide a range of relevant perspectives for observing organizations. Thus, an accountability dilemma in an organization can be investigated through an institutional framework. How can we understand the accountability dilemma in a public organization and obtain insight using an institutional theory lens? How do such accountability dilemmas occur in a public organization? Can an institutional theory explain this? I assume that institutional changes can surely generate an accountability dilemma. This paper explores how institutional theories could explain accountability dilemmas in public organizations. I also seek to develop a conceptual framework to relieve the accountability tension. This article distinguishes among regulative, normative, and cognitive institutional systems and separates change in individuals from organizational continuity.

Abstract

Institutional analysis can provide a range of relevant perspectives for observing organizations. Thus, an accountability dilemma in an organization can be investigated through an institutional framework. How can we understand the accountability dilemma in a public organization and obtain insight using an institutional theory lens? How do such accountability dilemmas occur in a public organization? Can an institutional theory explain this? I assume that institutional changes can surely generate an accountability dilemma. This paper explores how institutional theories could explain accountability dilemmas in public organizations. I also seek to develop a conceptual framework to relieve the accountability tension. This article distinguishes among regulative, normative, and cognitive institutional systems and separates change in individuals from organizational continuity.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. Mir Usman Ali, "Examining the Accountability-Performance Link: The Case of Citizen Oversight of Police", Public Performance & Management Review, 44(3), pp.523~559 (2020), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  2. Aucoin, "The Dialectics of Accountability for Performance in Public Management Reform", International Review of Administrative Sciences, 66, pp.45~55 (2000)
  3. Behn, R. D., "Rethinking Democratic Accountability" (2001), Brookings Institution Press
  4. Bovens, M., "Oxford Handbook of Public Management" (2005)
  5. Dubnick, M., "Accountability and Ethics : Reconsidering the Relationships", International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, 6(3), pp.405~441 (2003)
  6. Dubnick, M., "Accountability and the Promise of Performance : In Search of the Mechanisms", Public Performance & Management Review, 28(3), pp.376~417 (2005)
  7. Forrer, J., "Public–Private Partnerships and the Public Accountability Question", Public Administration Review, 70(3), pp.475~484 (2010)
  8. Gormley, W. T. Jr., "Bureaucracy and Democracy: Accountability and Performance" (2004), CQ Press
  9. ARIEHALACHMI, "WHO GETS WHAT, WHEN, AND HOW:PERFORMANCE MEASURES FOR ACCOUNTABILITY?FOR IMPROVED PERFORMANCE?", International Review of Public Administration, 7(1), pp.85~95 (2002), 한국행정학회
  10. Han, Y, "The Impact of Accountability on Organizational Performance in the U. S. Federal Government : The Moderating Role of Autonomy", Review of Public Personnel Administration, 39(1), pp.3~23 (2019)
  11. Hwang, K., "Exploring the Sources of Cognitive Gap between Accountability and Performance", Public Personnel Management, 49(3), pp.393~420 (2020)
  12. Hwang, K., "Public Caseworkers’ Strategies Coping with Accountability Demands", Journal of Public Affairs, 17(4), pp.1~8 (2017)
  13. Jos, P. H., "The Accountability Paradox in an Age of Reinvention : The Perennial Problem of Preserving Character and Judgment", Administration and Society, 36(3), pp.255~281 (2004)
  14. Kim, S. E., "Impact of Competing Accountability Requirements on Perceived Work Performance", The American Review of Public Administration, 40(1), pp.100~118 (2010)
  15. Kim, S. E., "Balancing Competing Accountability Requirements : Challenges in Performance Improvement of the Nonprofit Human services Agency", Public Performance & Management Review, 29(2), pp.145~163 (2005)
  16. Koppell, J. GS., "Pathologies of Accountability : ICANN and the Challenge of"Multiple Accountabilities Disorder", Public Administration, 65(1), pp.94~108 (2005)
  17. Marsh, J. G., "Democratic Governance" (1995), The Free Press
  18. Morrison, B. J., "Governance for Broadened Accountability : Blending Deliberate and Emergent Strategizing", Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(2), pp.195~217 (2007)
  19. Moyhihan, D. P., "Managing for Results in State Government: Evaluating a Decade of Reform", Public Administration Review, pp.77~89 (2006)
  20. Romzek, B., "Accountability in the Public Sector : Lessons from the Challenger Tragedy", Public Administration Review, 47(3), pp.227~238 (1987)
  21. Scott, W. R., "The Adolescence of Institutional Theory", Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, pp.493~511 (1987)
  22. Self, P., "Administrative Theories and Politics: An Inquiry into the Structure and Processes of Modern Government" (1973), University of Toronto Press
  23. Selznick, P., "Institutionalism “Old” and “New”", Administration Science Quarterly, 41, pp.270~277 (1996)
  24. Thornton, P H., "The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism" (2008)
  25. Tosi, H. L., "Theories of Organization" (2009), Sage Publications
  26. van Loon N. M., "Connecting Governance and the Front Lines : How Work Pressure and Autonomy Matter for Coping in Different Performance Regimes", Public Administration, 96(3), pp.435~451 (2018)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (2건)