Accountability and Performance in Public Organizations: An Institutional Perspective and Institutional Design
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Institutional analysis can provide a range of relevant perspectives for observing organizations. Thus, an accountability dilemma in an organization can be investigated through an institutional framework. How can we understand the accountability dilemma in a public organization and obtain insight using an institutional theory lens? How do such accountability dilemmas occur in a public organization? Can an institutional theory explain this? I assume that institutional changes can surely generate an accountability dilemma. This paper explores how institutional theories could explain accountability dilemmas in public organizations. I also seek to develop a conceptual framework to relieve the accountability tension. This article distinguishes among regulative, normative, and cognitive institutional systems and separates change in individuals from organizational continuity.
Abstract
Institutional analysis can provide a range of relevant perspectives for observing organizations. Thus, an accountability dilemma in an organization can be investigated through an institutional framework. How can we understand the accountability dilemma in a public organization and obtain insight using an institutional theory lens? How do such accountability dilemmas occur in a public organization? Can an institutional theory explain this? I assume that institutional changes can surely generate an accountability dilemma. This paper explores how institutional theories could explain accountability dilemmas in public organizations. I also seek to develop a conceptual framework to relieve the accountability tension. This article distinguishes among regulative, normative, and cognitive institutional systems and separates change in individuals from organizational continuity.
참고문헌 (26)
- Mir Usman Ali, "Examining the Accountability-Performance Link: The Case of Citizen Oversight of Police", Public Performance & Management Review, 44(3), pp.523~559 (2020), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
- Aucoin, "The Dialectics of Accountability for Performance in Public Management Reform", International Review of Administrative Sciences, 66, pp.45~55 (2000)
- Behn, R. D., "Rethinking Democratic Accountability" (2001), Brookings Institution Press
- Bovens, M., "Oxford Handbook of Public Management" (2005)
- Dubnick, M., "Accountability and Ethics : Reconsidering the Relationships", International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, 6(3), pp.405~441 (2003)
- Dubnick, M., "Accountability and the Promise of Performance : In Search of the Mechanisms", Public Performance & Management Review, 28(3), pp.376~417 (2005)
- Forrer, J., "Public–Private Partnerships and the Public Accountability Question", Public Administration Review, 70(3), pp.475~484 (2010)
- Gormley, W. T. Jr., "Bureaucracy and Democracy: Accountability and Performance" (2004), CQ Press
- ARIEHALACHMI, "WHO GETS WHAT, WHEN, AND HOW:PERFORMANCE MEASURES FOR ACCOUNTABILITY?FOR IMPROVED PERFORMANCE?", International Review of Public Administration, 7(1), pp.85~95 (2002), 한국행정학회
- Han, Y, "The Impact of Accountability on Organizational Performance in the U. S. Federal Government : The Moderating Role of Autonomy", Review of Public Personnel Administration, 39(1), pp.3~23 (2019)
- Hwang, K., "Exploring the Sources of Cognitive Gap between Accountability and Performance", Public Personnel Management, 49(3), pp.393~420 (2020)
- Hwang, K., "Public Caseworkers’ Strategies Coping with Accountability Demands", Journal of Public Affairs, 17(4), pp.1~8 (2017)
- Jos, P. H., "The Accountability Paradox in an Age of Reinvention : The Perennial Problem of Preserving Character and Judgment", Administration and Society, 36(3), pp.255~281 (2004)
- Kim, S. E., "Impact of Competing Accountability Requirements on Perceived Work Performance", The American Review of Public Administration, 40(1), pp.100~118 (2010)
- Kim, S. E., "Balancing Competing Accountability Requirements : Challenges in Performance Improvement of the Nonprofit Human services Agency", Public Performance & Management Review, 29(2), pp.145~163 (2005)
- Koppell, J. GS., "Pathologies of Accountability : ICANN and the Challenge of"Multiple Accountabilities Disorder", Public Administration, 65(1), pp.94~108 (2005)
- Marsh, J. G., "Democratic Governance" (1995), The Free Press
- Morrison, B. J., "Governance for Broadened Accountability : Blending Deliberate and Emergent Strategizing", Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(2), pp.195~217 (2007)
- Moyhihan, D. P., "Managing for Results in State Government: Evaluating a Decade of Reform", Public Administration Review, pp.77~89 (2006)
- Romzek, B., "Accountability in the Public Sector : Lessons from the Challenger Tragedy", Public Administration Review, 47(3), pp.227~238 (1987)
- Scott, W. R., "The Adolescence of Institutional Theory", Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, pp.493~511 (1987)
- Self, P., "Administrative Theories and Politics: An Inquiry into the Structure and Processes of Modern Government" (1973), University of Toronto Press
- Selznick, P., "Institutionalism “Old” and “New”", Administration Science Quarterly, 41, pp.270~277 (1996)
- Thornton, P H., "The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism" (2008)
- Tosi, H. L., "Theories of Organization" (2009), Sage Publications
- van Loon N. M., "Connecting Governance and the Front Lines : How Work Pressure and Autonomy Matter for Coping in Different Performance Regimes", Public Administration, 96(3), pp.435~451 (2018)
