Graphene oxide-nanocellulose-cellulose acetate mixed matrix membrane as an efficient separator for carbon dioxide from natural gas
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Removing carbon dioxide (CO₂) from natural gas is essential for improving fuel quality, preventing pipeline corrosion, andenhancing energy efficiency. Membrane technology offers a selective and efficient method for CO₂ removal, ensuring naturalgas meets industry standards. This process reduces greenhouse gas emissions, supporting cleaner and more sustainable energyproduction. In this study, Mixed-matrix membranes (MMMs) incorporating graphene oxide (GO) stabilized by nanocellulosefibers (NCF) within a cellulose acetate (CA) matrix were synthesized and evaluated for CO₂/CH₄ gas separation. The CA/NCF/GO-1 membrane, with 1 wt% GO, demonstrated optimal performance, achieving a CO₂ permeability of 77.8 Barrerand an ideal CO₂/CH₄ selectivity of 24.3. SEM and FT-IR analyses confirmed the uniform dispersion of GO and strongfiller-polymer interactions. XRD revealed enhanced crystallinity with GO addition, while TGA indicated thermal stability,with decomposition temperatures ranging from 277 °C to 310 °C. Mechanical testing showed increased tensile strength(up to 60 MPa) with filler addition, though excessive GO (2 wt%) caused aggregation and highly reduced % elongation atbreak. Gas permeabilities decreased at higher feed pressures (5 bar), aligning with the dual-sorption model. The CA/NCF/GO-1 membrane demonstrated high stability over one week and approached Robeson’s 2008 upper bound, highlighting itspotential for industrial CO₂ separation.
Abstract
Removing carbon dioxide (CO₂) from natural gas is essential for improving fuel quality, preventing pipeline corrosion, andenhancing energy efficiency. Membrane technology offers a selective and efficient method for CO₂ removal, ensuring naturalgas meets industry standards. This process reduces greenhouse gas emissions, supporting cleaner and more sustainable energyproduction. In this study, Mixed-matrix membranes (MMMs) incorporating graphene oxide (GO) stabilized by nanocellulosefibers (NCF) within a cellulose acetate (CA) matrix were synthesized and evaluated for CO₂/CH₄ gas separation. The CA/NCF/GO-1 membrane, with 1 wt% GO, demonstrated optimal performance, achieving a CO₂ permeability of 77.8 Barrerand an ideal CO₂/CH₄ selectivity of 24.3. SEM and FT-IR analyses confirmed the uniform dispersion of GO and strongfiller-polymer interactions. XRD revealed enhanced crystallinity with GO addition, while TGA indicated thermal stability,with decomposition temperatures ranging from 277 °C to 310 °C. Mechanical testing showed increased tensile strength(up to 60 MPa) with filler addition, though excessive GO (2 wt%) caused aggregation and highly reduced % elongation atbreak. Gas permeabilities decreased at higher feed pressures (5 bar), aligning with the dual-sorption model. The CA/NCF/GO-1 membrane demonstrated high stability over one week and approached Robeson’s 2008 upper bound, highlighting itspotential for industrial CO₂ separation.
참고문헌 (32)
- A. Imtiaz, , Membranes, 12(7), pp.646~ (2022)
- Z. Y. Yeo, , J. Nat. Gas Chem, 21(3), pp.282~298 (2012)
- D. Chen, , Carbon Capture Sci. Technol, 7, pp.100117~ (2023)
- Z. Li, , J. Ceram. Process. Res, 25(3), pp.389~403 (2024)
- P. Wu, , J. Ceram. Process. Res, 16(1), pp.102~106 (2015)
- G. Hazarika, , Sci. Total Environ, 944, pp.173264~ (2024)
- Z. Bashir, , RSC Adv, 14, pp.19560~19580 (2024)
- T. -S. Chung, , Prog. Polym. Sci, 32(4), pp.483~507 (2007)
- S. Li, , Polymers, 13, pp.2539~ (2021)
- M. Galizia, , Macromolecules, 50(20), pp.7809~7843 (2017)
- A. Ali, , Mater. Sci. Energy Technol, 2, pp.83~88 (2019)
- T. K. Junita, , ACS Omega, 9, pp.20658~20669 (2024)
- N. Li, , Membranes, 9(6), pp.70~ (2019)
- A. Jamil, , Adv. Polym. Technol, 12, pp.8855577~ (2020)
- R. Umapriya, , J. Ceram. Process. Res, 21(3), pp.309~318 (2020)
- R. Umapriya, , J. Ceram. Process. Res, 20(3), pp.291~300 (2019)
- F. Zhou, , Chem. Eng. J, 430, pp.132942~ (2022)
- J. M. Luque-Alled, , ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 13, pp.55517~55533 (2021)
- F. Pazani, , Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev, 160, pp.112294~ (2022)
- Z. Niu, , Chem. Eng. J, 494, pp.152912~ (2024)
- O. Mehmood, , Greenhouse Gas Sci. Technol, 11, pp.313~330 (2021)
- C. Regmi, , Membranes, 12(10), pp.917~ (2022)
- H. Z. Ferrari, , Polym. Eng. Sci, 64(6), pp.2875~2893 (2024)
- Y. Liu, , Membranes, 12(12), pp.1274~ (2022)
- J. G. Wijmans, "The solution-diffusion model: a review", J. Membr. Sci, 107(1-2), pp.1~21 (1995)
- Y. Zhang, , Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control, 12, pp.84~107 (2013)
- Z. Wang, , Cellulose, 29, pp.1873~1881 (2022)
- Y. Li, , Membr. Sci, 260(1-2), pp.45~55 (2005)
- M. M. Rajpure, , Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 50(A), pp.615~628 (2024)
- S. Kanehashi, , Membr. Sci, 253(1-2), pp.117~138 (2005)
- H. B. Park, , Science, 356 (2017)
- N. Panapitiya, , Materials, 9(8), pp.643~ (2016)