본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Effect of hydrothermal time on the structure and property of graphene oxide membrane

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류재료공학

초록

Two dimensional graphene oxide (GO) has potential application in membrane separation owing to its unique structure andphysicochemical properties. In this study, the reduced graphene oxide (rGO) was synthesized from GO via hydrothermaltreatment at 160 oC for 1, 2, 3 and 4 h, and the rGO membranes were prepared on cellulose nitrate supporting membranesby vacuum filtration. The structural change and chemical composition of GO were investigated using X-ray diffraction (XRD),Raman spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM),atomic force microscopy (AFM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) andcontact angle measurements. The result shows that uniformly intact rGO membranes with good hydrophobicity could beachieved by adjusting the reduction degree of GO through changing the hydrothermal reaction time. The huge improvementof the hydrophobic property of rGO could be attributed to the removal of the most the hydrophilic oxygen-containingfunctional groups on the surface of GO. Additionally, the structure, chemical composition, and d-spacing of the GO can alsobe controlled by adjusting the reduction time. This method holds great potential because it can be prepared in large quantitiesat low cost, and suitable for applications in membrane technologies.

Abstract

Two dimensional graphene oxide (GO) has potential application in membrane separation owing to its unique structure andphysicochemical properties. In this study, the reduced graphene oxide (rGO) was synthesized from GO via hydrothermaltreatment at 160 oC for 1, 2, 3 and 4 h, and the rGO membranes were prepared on cellulose nitrate supporting membranesby vacuum filtration. The structural change and chemical composition of GO were investigated using X-ray diffraction (XRD),Raman spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM),atomic force microscopy (AFM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) andcontact angle measurements. The result shows that uniformly intact rGO membranes with good hydrophobicity could beachieved by adjusting the reduction degree of GO through changing the hydrothermal reaction time. The huge improvementof the hydrophobic property of rGO could be attributed to the removal of the most the hydrophilic oxygen-containingfunctional groups on the surface of GO. Additionally, the structure, chemical composition, and d-spacing of the GO can alsobe controlled by adjusting the reduction time. This method holds great potential because it can be prepared in large quantitiesat low cost, and suitable for applications in membrane technologies.

참고문헌 (101)

  1. A. K. Geim, , Nat. Mater, 6(3), pp.183~191 (2007)
  2. A. K. Geim, , Science, 324(5934), pp.1530~1534 (2009)
  3. 나한길, "Decoration of Ag nanoparticles on reduced graphene oxide and their application to gas sensors", Journal of Ceramic Processing Research, 17(6), pp.523~531 (2016), 청정에너지연구소[DOI]
  4. Tran Van Khai, "High-quality graphene thin films synthesized by H2 ambient-annealing of reduced graphene oxide sheets", Journal of Ceramic Processing Research, 14(3), pp.355~362 (2013), 청정에너지연구소[DOI]
  5. X. Y. Zhou, , Electrochim. Acta, 143, pp.175~179 (2014)
  6. Qiru Li, Zhufa Zhou, "Chitosan assisted synthesis of LiFePO4", Graphene, Journal of Ceramic Processing Research, pp.2016, 17(5)[DOI]
  7. V. V. Brus, , Sol. Energy, 107, pp.74~81 (2014)
  8. R. Kumar, , Carbon, 79, pp.192~202 (2014)
  9. Tae-Hyun Kim, "Graphene supported platinum for oxygen reduction reaction electrocatalyst through a facile microwave-assisted polyol synthesis", Journal of Ceramic Processing Research, 18(3), pp.261~264 (2017), 청정에너지연구소[DOI]
  10. ZENG BIN, "Facile fabrication of SnS microflower-graphene with efficient photocatalytic activity under visible light", Journal of Ceramic Processing Research, 18(2), pp.108~111 (2017), 청정에너지연구소[DOI]
  11. F. Barroso-Bujans, , Carbon, 48(11), pp.3277~3286 (2010)
  12. B. Feng, , Desalination, 394, pp.123~130 (2016)
  13. M. Hu, , Environ. Sci. Technol, 47(8), pp.3715~3723 (2013)
  14. J. Shen, , RSC Adv, 6(59), pp.54281~54285 (2016)
  15. H. W. Kim, , Science, 342(6154), pp.91~95 (2013)
  16. W. Hung, , Carbon, 68, pp.670~677 (2014)
  17. S. Priyadarsini, , J. Nanostructure Chem, 8(2), pp.123~137 (2018)
  18. Y. Yang, , Materials Today, 16(10), pp.365~373 (2013)
  19. R. K. Joshi, , Science, 343(6172), pp.752~754 (2014)
  20. R. R. Nair, , Science, 335(6067), pp.442~444 (2012)
  21. B. Mi, , Science, 343(6172), pp.740~742 (2014)
  22. H. Li, , Science, 342(6154), pp.95~98 (2013)
  23. S. Park, , Nat. Nanotechnol, 4(4), pp.217~224 (2009)
  24. H. C. Schniepp, , J. Phys. Chem. B, 110(17), pp.8535~8539 (2006)
  25. K. H. Thebo, , Nat. Commun, 9(1), pp.1486~ (2018)
  26. S. Pei, , Nat. Commun, 9(1), pp.145~ (2018)
  27. D. R. Dreyer, , Chem. Soc. Rev, 39(1), pp.228~240 (2010)
  28. J. Abraham, , Nat. Nanotechnol, 12(6), pp.546~550 (2017)
  29. L. Chen, , Nature, 550(7676), pp.380~383 (2017)
  30. S. Wang, , Angew. Chem. Int. Ed, 56(45), pp.14246~14251 (2017)
  31. T. Wu, , Adv. Sci, 8, pp.2002717~ (2021)
  32. V. Saraswat, , ACS Nano, 12(8), pp.7855~7865 (2018)
  33. F. Fu, , J. Environ. Manage, 92(3), pp.407~418 (2011)
  34. J. Abraham, , Nat. Nanotechnol, 12(6), pp.546~550 (2017)
  35. P. Sun, , NPG Asia Mater, 7(5), pp.e162~ (2015)
  36. Y. Han, , ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 7(15), pp.8147~8155 (2015)
  37. G. Liu, , Chem. Soc. Rev, 44(15), pp.5016~5030 (2015)
  38. Y. Zhang, , Environ. Sci. Technol, 49(16), pp.10235~10242 (2015)
  39. J. Y. Chong, , Chem. Commun, 54(20), pp.2554~2557 (2018)
  40. H. Huang, , Chem. Commun, 49(53), pp.5963~5965 (2013)
  41. Y. Wei, , Carbon, 108, pp.568~575 (2016)
  42. C. Xu, , Carbon, 62, pp.465~471 (2013)
  43. C. Mattevi, , Adv. Funct. Mater, 19(16), pp.2577~2583 (2009)
  44. D. Yang, , Carbon, 47(1), pp.145~152 (2009)
  45. X. Wang, , Nano Lett, 8(1), pp.323~327 (2008)
  46. Y. W. Zhu, , Carbon, 48(7), pp.2118~2122 (2010)
  47. H. M. A. Hassan, , J. Mater. Chem, 19(23), pp.3832~3837 (2009)
  48. H. H. Huang, , J. Membr. Sci, 572, pp.12~19 (2019)
  49. J. Zhang, , Chem. Commun, 46(7), pp.1112~1114 (2010)
  50. H. H. Huang, , Scientific Reports, 8(1), pp.6849~ (2018)
  51. X. Mei, , Physica E, 68, pp.81~86 (2015)
  52. Y. L. Zhang, , Nano Today, 5(1), pp.15~20 (2010)
  53. M. F. El-Kady, , Science, 335(6074), pp.1326~1330 (2012)
  54. W. Gao, , Nat. Nanotechnol, 6(8), pp.496~500 (2011)
  55. G. Williams, , ACS Nano, 2(7), pp.1487~1491 (2008)
  56. T. V. Khai, , Chem. Eng. J, 232, pp.345~355 (2013)
  57. M. J. McAllister, , Chem. Mater, 19(18), pp.4396~4404 (2007)
  58. H. H. Huang, , Scientific Reports, 8(1), pp.8~ (2018)
  59. B. K. Barman, , RSC Adv, 3(31), pp.12621~12624 (2013)
  60. Z. J. Fan, , ACS Nano, 5(1), pp.191~198 (2011)
  61. X. Mei, , Carbon, 49(15), pp.5389~5397 (2011)
  62. K. Krishnamoorthy, , Carbon, 53, pp.38~49 (2013)
  63. H. He, , J. Phys. Chem, 100(51), pp.19954~19958 (1996)
  64. A. Lerf, , J. Phys. Chem. B, 102(23), pp.4477~4482 (1998)
  65. C. K. Chua, , Chem. Soc. Rev, 43(1), pp.291~312 (2014)
  66. Y. Jin, , Appl. Surf. Sci, 268, pp.541~546 (2013)
  67. C. P. P. Wong, , Materials, 8(10), pp.7118~7128 (2015)
  68. F. C. Tai, , J. Raman Spectrosc, 41(9), pp.933~937 (2010)
  69. A. C. Ferrari, , Nat. Nanotechnol, 8(4), pp.235~246 (2013)
  70. A. Eckmann, , Phys. Rev. B, 88(3), pp.035426~035411 (2013)
  71. F. Tuinstra, , J. Chem. Phys, 53(3), pp.1126~1130 (1970)
  72. A. C. Ferrari, , Phys. Rev. B, 61(20), pp.14095~14107 (2000)
  73. D. Chen, , Nanotechnology, 22(32), pp.325601~325607 (2011)
  74. Y. Xu, , ACS Nano, 4(7), pp.4324~4330 (2010)
  75. J. Wang, , Electrochim. Acta, 88, pp.847~857 (2013)
  76. O. Akhavan, , J. Phys. Chem. C, 114(30), pp.12955~12959 (2010)
  77. S. Stankovich, , Carbon, 45(7), pp.1558~1565 (2007)
  78. X. Dong, , Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys, 12(9), pp.2164~2169 (2010)
  79. Y. Zhou, , Chem. Mater, 21(13), pp.2950~2956 (2009)
  80. S. Gurunathan, , Colloids Surf. B, 102, pp.772~777 (2013)
  81. A. C. Ferrari, , Phys. Rev. Lett, 97(18), pp.187401~187404 (2006)
  82. J. Liang, , ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 5(22), pp.12148~12155 (2013)
  83. C. Hontorialucas, , Carbon, 33(11), pp.1585~1592 (1995)
  84. C. Nethravathi, , Carbon, 46(14), pp.1994~1998 (2008)
  85. H. He, , Chem. Phys. Lett, 287(1-2), pp.53~56 (1998)
  86. S. Stankovich, , J. Mater. Chem, 16(2), pp.155~158 (2006)
  87. J. S. Bunch, , Nano Lett, 8(8), pp.2458~2462 (2008)
  88. J. Wang, , ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 8(9), pp.6211~6218 (2016)
  89. B. Qi, , Nat. Commun, 8(1), pp.825~ (2017)
  90. N. Wei, , Langmuir, 30(12), pp.3572~3578 (2014)
  91. X. Fan, , Sep. Purif. Technol, 241, pp.116730~116738 (2020)
  92. X. Li, , J. Phys. Chem. C, 117(27), pp.14106~14112 (2013)
  93. Y. P. Tang, , J. Membr. Sci, 458, pp.199~208 (2014)
  94. C. Botas, , Carbon, 50(1), pp.275~282 (2012)
  95. A. Klechikov, , Nanoscale, 7(37), pp.15374~15384 (2015)
  96. W.J. Lau, "Advanced Nanomaterials for Membrane Synthesis and Its Applications", pp.84~ (2019), Elsevier
  97. Y. Han Z. Xu, , Adv. Funct. Mater, 23(29), pp.3693~3700 (2013)
  98. H. Huang, , Nat. Commun, 4(4), pp.2979~ (2013)
  99. Q. Yang, , Nat. Mater, 16(12), pp.1198~1202 (2017)
  100. C. Tsou, , J. Membr. Sci, 477, pp.93~100 (2015)
  101. W. L. Xu, , Nano Lett, 17(5), pp.2928~2933 (2017)

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)