건강정보의 이차적 이용
Secondary Use of Health Information
0
조회
0
다운로드
15
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Traditionally medical information has used for the purpose of clinical care. Also it has used for the accumulation of medical knowledge and experiences. However, because of the rapid development of biomedical science, the situation has been changing. Besides the traditional medical information, genetic information and other information which has not been included in traditional medical information are attracted attention. So, the term “health information”, instead of medical information is appropriate for referring the information which is related to human health condition. Health information should be regulated properly because it contains patient’s or subject’s private information. If health information is abuses or misused, the privacy of individuals who provide their information. There are some Acts which regulate the use of health information in Korea. Use of medical information is regulated by <Medical Act>. Collection and Use of genetic information is regulated by <Bioethics and Biosafety Act>. However, there are great needs for secondary use of health information. there are many situations which may use health information which is collected and created during medical practices or researches, such as for the purposes of another researches, health insurance or cohort studies. In using health information, respect of individual’s autonomy is the most important principle to be considered. Informed consent of patient or subject is the means to respect individual’s autonomy. Another issue which is considered whether we allow secondary use of health information is the benefit when we use health information. If the risk of secondary use of health information is trivial and the benefit is very big, we can allow it under appropriate regulation. Also, we should use health information for controlling very severe infectious diseases. Medical practitioners contribute to make health information. When medical doctors examine patients and collect health information from patients, they also evaluate and manipulate raw information which they gain. Also, they create health information during the procedure of medical practice. For example, medical practitioners decide which lab they will order or which process they will do. Because of these aspects, we should consider medical practitioners’ right when we regulate the secondary use of health information.
Abstract
Traditionally medical information has used for the purpose of clinical care. Also it has used for the accumulation of medical knowledge and experiences. However, because of the rapid development of biomedical science, the situation has been changing. Besides the traditional medical information, genetic information and other information which has not been included in traditional medical information are attracted attention. So, the term “health information”, instead of medical information is appropriate for referring the information which is related to human health condition. Health information should be regulated properly because it contains patient’s or subject’s private information. If health information is abuses or misused, the privacy of individuals who provide their information. There are some Acts which regulate the use of health information in Korea. Use of medical information is regulated by <Medical Act>. Collection and Use of genetic information is regulated by <Bioethics and Biosafety Act>. However, there are great needs for secondary use of health information. there are many situations which may use health information which is collected and created during medical practices or researches, such as for the purposes of another researches, health insurance or cohort studies. In using health information, respect of individual’s autonomy is the most important principle to be considered. Informed consent of patient or subject is the means to respect individual’s autonomy. Another issue which is considered whether we allow secondary use of health information is the benefit when we use health information. If the risk of secondary use of health information is trivial and the benefit is very big, we can allow it under appropriate regulation. Also, we should use health information for controlling very severe infectious diseases. Medical practitioners contribute to make health information. When medical doctors examine patients and collect health information from patients, they also evaluate and manipulate raw information which they gain. Also, they create health information during the procedure of medical practice. For example, medical practitioners decide which lab they will order or which process they will do. Because of these aspects, we should consider medical practitioners’ right when we regulate the secondary use of health information.
참고문헌 (11)
- 김종철, "헌법적 기본권으로서의 개인정보통제권의 재구성을 위한 시론", 인터넷 법률, (4), pp.23~44 (2001)
- 성영곤, "히포크라테스 전통: 최근 2세기 연구사", 의사학, 6(1), pp.105~120 (1997)
- 이인호, "공공부문 개인정보보호법제에 대한 분석과 비판-공공기관의 개인정보보호에관한법률을 중심으로-", 정보법학, 6(1), pp.27~60 (2002)
- 정규원, "피해자의 승낙에 대한 연구-의료행위를 중심으로-", 박사, 법학과, pp.1999
- 정규원, "의료정보의 활용 및 보호", 정보법학, 6(1), pp.1~25 (2002)
- 정규원, "유전자검사의 법적 문제", 법과사회, 24, pp.277~312 (2003), 법과사회이론학회
- 정규원, "미성년자에 대한 유전자검사-동의권을 중심으로-", ELSI연구, 3(1), pp.117~136 (2005)
- 정규원, "인간유전체 기능연구 윤리지침 및 해설" (2006), 마루벌 사이언스
- 공공유전자은행에 대한 사회 인식조사 : 전화 응답자 조사, "조성겸", KAIST ELSI 연구실, ~ (2009)
- 최정열, "인터넷과 개인정보의 보호", 정보법학, 6(1), pp.101~159 (2002)
- Richard Whiddett, "Patient’s attitudes towards sharing their health information", International Journal of Medical Information, 75, pp.530~541 (2006)
