본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

상법 제663조에 관한 해석론의 문제점과 개선방안에 관한 소고

A Study on Improvement for the Problems of Interpretation Regarding the Korea Commercial Code Article 663

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

The Commercial Act article 663 is so called “the principle of the prohibition of the disadvantage alteration” and it is a special legislation that makes all the articles in the 4th part of Commercial Act to be minimum standard for the protection of policy holder, the insured or beneficiary. That is to say, all the articles in the 4th part of Commercial Act turn to be relative compulsory statutes owing to the article 663. Even though the form of this provision is unprecedented in comparison with other legal systems, the contents and the scope of coverage are excessively abstract. The main issues that have been reviewed through this study are summarized as follows:first whether it is possible to accept a concept of exclusions from application. second whether it is reasonable for the accident issue on the exemption coverage from application and the criteria for judging the non-mandatory provisions. Hence, it would be desirable to revise the provision for improvements. It is imperative to make a systematic classification of the existing judicial decisions according to their common characteristics, make clear the applicable coverage and the effect of the principle, and prescribe the provision of the principle at the last part of each chapter or each section. Futhermore, it is required to individualize the scope of subjects under protection. In addition,to ensure equal negotiating power and from the viewpoint of providing paternal consideration and protection of the law, it is necessary to provide an applicable provision to allow concrete judgment.

Abstract

The Commercial Act article 663 is so called “the principle of the prohibition of the disadvantage alteration” and it is a special legislation that makes all the articles in the 4th part of Commercial Act to be minimum standard for the protection of policy holder, the insured or beneficiary. That is to say, all the articles in the 4th part of Commercial Act turn to be relative compulsory statutes owing to the article 663. Even though the form of this provision is unprecedented in comparison with other legal systems, the contents and the scope of coverage are excessively abstract. The main issues that have been reviewed through this study are summarized as follows:first whether it is possible to accept a concept of exclusions from application. second whether it is reasonable for the accident issue on the exemption coverage from application and the criteria for judging the non-mandatory provisions. Hence, it would be desirable to revise the provision for improvements. It is imperative to make a systematic classification of the existing judicial decisions according to their common characteristics, make clear the applicable coverage and the effect of the principle, and prescribe the provision of the principle at the last part of each chapter or each section. Futhermore, it is required to individualize the scope of subjects under protection. In addition,to ensure equal negotiating power and from the viewpoint of providing paternal consideration and protection of the law, it is necessary to provide an applicable provision to allow concrete judgment.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. 김성태, "보험법강론" (2001), 법문사
  2. 손주찬, "상법(하)제11전증보판" (2005), 박영사
  3. 양승규, "상사법사례연습" (1998), 삼지원
  4. 양승규, "보험법(제3판)" (2005), 삼지원
  5. 장덕조, "보험법" (2011), 법문사
  6. 정찬형, "상법강의(하)(제8판)" (2006), 박영사
  7. 최기원, "보험법(3판)" (2002), 박영사
  8. 고평석, "보험약관 유효성 심사기준으로서 상법 제663조", 비교사법, 4(2) (1997), 한국비교사법학회
  9. 김혜란, "상법 제663조에 대한 연구", 보험법연구, 5(1) (2011), 한국보험법학회
  10. 박세민, "현행 자동차보험계약상 무면허ㆍ음주운전 면책약관의 해석론 -대인배상 Ⅱ와 자기신체사고보험을 대상으로-", 경영법률, 13(1) (2002), 한국경영법률학회
  11. 서영화, "보험법상 불이익변경금지원칙의 적용제외범위", 인권과 정의, (259) (1998), 대한변협회지
  12. 송달섭, "상법 제663조의 해석범위에 대한 재검토 -판례를 중심으로-", 기업법연구, 23(3), pp.123~158 (2009), 한국기업법학회
  13. 심상무, "商法 제663조에 관한 연구", 비교사법, 11(3), pp.373~404 (2004), 한국비교사법학회
  14. 양해환, "상법 제663조 불이익변경금지윈칙적용에 있어서 문제점-최고제도와 관련하여-", 기업법연구, 8 (2001)
  15. 이용석, "상법 제663조의 해석과 그 적용범위에 관한 고찰", 보험학회지, 57 (2000), 한국보험학회
  16. 정호열, "보험계약법의 상대적 강행법성에 관한 고찰", 상사법연구, 17(3) (1999), 한국상사법학회
  17. 최병규, "2007년 독일 보험계약법개정안에 관한 소고 - 통칙부분을 중심으로 -", 상사판례연구, 20(1), pp.179~208 (2007), 한국상사판례학회
  18. 萩本修, "保険法立案関係資料", 別冊商事法務, (321) (2008), 商事法務
  19. 山下友信, "新しい保険法-総論的事項および若干の共通事項", ジュリスト, (1364) (2008), 有斐閣
  20. 柴田健, "保険法第36条の片面的強行規定適用除外の考え方", 損害保険研究, 73(1) (2011), 損害保険事業総合研究所,
  21. John Birds, "Modern Insurance Law" (2007), Sweet & Maxwell
  22. Nicholas Legh-Jones, "MacGillivray on Insurance Law" (2003), Sweet & Maxwell
  23. Robert Merkin, "Colinvaux’s Law of Insurance" (1997), Sweet & Maxwell
  24. V. Cowan, "Encyclopedia of Insurance Law" (1998), Sweet & Maxwell
  25. Rüffer, "Versicherungs-vertragsgesetz, 1 Auflage" (2009), Nomos

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)