보험자의 보험약관 설명의무와 그 새로운 입법안
Insurer's obligation to explain standard insurance terms and the new bill
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Laws such as the Insurance Part of the Commercial Law, the Regulation of Standard Contracts Law, and the Insurance Business Law stipulate the insurer's obligation to explain standard insurance terms as the minimum legal device for protecting policyholders under informational asymmetry resulting from the complexity of the standard insurance terms drafted unilaterally by the insurer and the adhesion of insurance contracts. With regard to the insurer's violation of the obligation to explain standard insurance terms, while the Insurance Part of the Commercial Law stipulates only the policyholder's right of rescission but is silent about the specific effect of the violation when the policyholder does not exercise the right of rescission, the Regulation of Standard Contracts Law applies the regulation of incorporation of clauses. In this way, the double application principle based on the will theory confronts the commercial law application principle based on the norm theory with regard to the effect of standard insurance terms after the period for exercising the right of rescission has passed. Accordingly, as a bill faithful the double application principle, we suggest a new bill in which Clause 2 of Article 638-3 of the Commercial Law stipulates, “If the insurer violates the obligation to explain standard insurance terms the insurer shall not assert the corresponding standard insurance terms as the contents of the insurance contract,” having the same purpose as Article 3-4 of the Regulation of Standard Contracts Law based on the latter part of Article 17 of the Chinese Insurance Law on insurer's obligation of evident explanation. This will be the amendment satisfying best the legislative purpose of the obligation to explain standard insurance terms. Moreover, we need to establish standard guidelines for interpretation in order to prevent confusions in interpretation resulting from the double application of relevant laws and to enhance the efficiency of legislation. What is more, we need to improve the insurance law as an independent special law according to international standards in order to advance commercial legal systems and to intensify the insurer's information duty.
Abstract
Laws such as the Insurance Part of the Commercial Law, the Regulation of Standard Contracts Law, and the Insurance Business Law stipulate the insurer's obligation to explain standard insurance terms as the minimum legal device for protecting policyholders under informational asymmetry resulting from the complexity of the standard insurance terms drafted unilaterally by the insurer and the adhesion of insurance contracts. With regard to the insurer's violation of the obligation to explain standard insurance terms, while the Insurance Part of the Commercial Law stipulates only the policyholder's right of rescission but is silent about the specific effect of the violation when the policyholder does not exercise the right of rescission, the Regulation of Standard Contracts Law applies the regulation of incorporation of clauses. In this way, the double application principle based on the will theory confronts the commercial law application principle based on the norm theory with regard to the effect of standard insurance terms after the period for exercising the right of rescission has passed. Accordingly, as a bill faithful the double application principle, we suggest a new bill in which Clause 2 of Article 638-3 of the Commercial Law stipulates, “If the insurer violates the obligation to explain standard insurance terms the insurer shall not assert the corresponding standard insurance terms as the contents of the insurance contract,” having the same purpose as Article 3-4 of the Regulation of Standard Contracts Law based on the latter part of Article 17 of the Chinese Insurance Law on insurer's obligation of evident explanation. This will be the amendment satisfying best the legislative purpose of the obligation to explain standard insurance terms. Moreover, we need to establish standard guidelines for interpretation in order to prevent confusions in interpretation resulting from the double application of relevant laws and to enhance the efficiency of legislation. What is more, we need to improve the insurance law as an independent special law according to international standards in order to advance commercial legal systems and to intensify the insurer's information duty.
참고문헌 (32)
- 김성태, "보험법강론" (2002), 법문사
- 김은경, "보험자의 설명의무에 대한 재고", 상사판례연구, 20(3), pp.111~137 (2007), 한국상사판례학회
- 김헌무, "보험법요론" (2008), 대구대학교 출판부
- 대한변호사협회, "상법(보험편) 일부개정법률안(정부, 의안번호 8065호)에 대한 의견", 인권과 정의, 통권 : 381 (2008), 대한변호사협회
- 박세민, "자동차보험법의 이론과 실무" (2007), 세창출판사
- 박세민, "보험법" (2011), 박영사
- 박은경, "중국보험법상 보험자의 "明確說明"의무에 관한 연구", 법학연구, (25), pp.203~224 (2007), 한국법학회
- 사법연수원, "보험법 연구" (2010), 사법연수원 출판부
- 성대규, "한국 보험업법" (2012), 도서출판 두남
- 송호신, "보험약관의 교부ㆍ설명의무", 법학연구, (37), pp.319~344 (2010), 한국법학회
- 양승규, "보험법" (1998), 삼지원
- 여미숙, "무보험자동차에 의한 상해보험과 약관의 명시ㆍ설명의무, In 상사판례연구(Ⅵ)" (2006), 박영사
- 이기수, "보험ㆍ해상법(제8판), In 보험ㆍ해상법" (2008), 박영사
- 이필규, "2009년 독일 보험계약법(VVG)" (2009), 세창출판사
- 이현열, "개정 표준약관 개관", 보험법연구, 4(1) (2010), 한국보험법학회
- 장경환, "상법 제4편(보험)제1장(통칙)의 주요 개정과제", 보험법연구, (창간) (2007), 한국보험법학회
- 장경환, "상법 제4편(보험) 개정안상의 주요 쟁점조항의 검토", 상법 일부개정법률안(보험편)에 관한 공청회 (2009), 국회 법제사법위원회
- 장덕조, "合理的期待原則과 保險約款의 本質論", 기업법연구, 20(4), pp.235~252 (2006), 한국기업법학회
- 장덕조, "보험자의 설명의무, In 민사판례연구(XXIX)" (2007), 박영사
- 장덕조, "보험법" (2011), 법문사
- 정찬형, "상법강의(하)(제13판)" (2011), 박영사
- 정호열, "상법 개정안 통칙에 관한 검토", 보험법연구, 1(2) (2007), 한국보험법학회
- 제철웅, "민법연습" (2007), 홍문사
- 최기원, "보험법" (1998), 박영사
- 최준선, "보험법ㆍ해상법" (2010), 삼영사
- 최병규, "보험자의 정보제공의무 도입방안에 관한 연구", 상사판례연구, 24(3), pp.311~342 (2011), 한국상사판례학회
- 보험계약 취소요건과 소비자보호 방안 연구 -보험상품 불완전판매로 인한 소비자피해를 중심으로-, "한국소비자원 정책연구본부", 한국소비자원, ~ (2008)
- 한창희, "보험법" (2011), 국민대학교 출판부
- 한창희, "정보비대칭하에서의 보험자의 정보제공의무", 법학논총, 23(2), pp.131~159 (2011), 법학연구소
- Alastair Hudson, "The Law of Finance" (2009), Sweet & Maxwell
- John Birds, "Modern insurance Law" (2010), Sweet & Maxwell
- Malcolm A. Clarke, "The Law of Insurance Contracts" (1994), Informa Pub
