본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

자본시장 불공정거래로 인한 손해배상 활성화

Damages and Unfair Trade in Capital Market

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act(hereafter "the Act") provides that such the unfair trades as the abuse of non-publicized crucial information(art. 174 of the Act), the operation of market prices(art. 176 of the Act), unfair competion(art. 178 of the Act) be punished so as for the actor to be in prison up to 10 years or fined up to five hundred million(art. 443 of the Act); the Act also provides that the victims of the unfair trades have access to damages(arts. 175, 177, 179 of the Act). Such regulations in both criminal as well as civil dimensions have been continually reinforced in the process of reforming the old Securities Transaction Act(s) as well as establishing the Act; in addition, Act on Securities-Related Class Actions was introduced to come into force on January 1, 2005. However, the capital market nowadays faces, notwithstanding all the legislatorial endeavors mentioned in the above, continuously increasing number of unfair trades by the hands not only of securities specialists and but also of individual investors. With the increasing number of unfair trades, the number and amount of victims are on the increase in the direct proportion; the victims actually seldom reach to actions for damages to be fully compensated, which witness that Act is not playing its role in spite of the codification of damages. This article scrutinizes the actualities of damages actions, analyses the causes for their under-utilization and attempts to find how to make them work better. Especially, the author tries to check whether and how far the Market Oversight Commission of Korea Exchange, as institution set up for the fairness, reliability and efficiency fo the capital market, could contribute to facilitating damages against unfair trades.

Abstract

Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act(hereafter "the Act") provides that such the unfair trades as the abuse of non-publicized crucial information(art. 174 of the Act), the operation of market prices(art. 176 of the Act), unfair competion(art. 178 of the Act) be punished so as for the actor to be in prison up to 10 years or fined up to five hundred million(art. 443 of the Act); the Act also provides that the victims of the unfair trades have access to damages(arts. 175, 177, 179 of the Act). Such regulations in both criminal as well as civil dimensions have been continually reinforced in the process of reforming the old Securities Transaction Act(s) as well as establishing the Act; in addition, Act on Securities-Related Class Actions was introduced to come into force on January 1, 2005. However, the capital market nowadays faces, notwithstanding all the legislatorial endeavors mentioned in the above, continuously increasing number of unfair trades by the hands not only of securities specialists and but also of individual investors. With the increasing number of unfair trades, the number and amount of victims are on the increase in the direct proportion; the victims actually seldom reach to actions for damages to be fully compensated, which witness that Act is not playing its role in spite of the codification of damages. This article scrutinizes the actualities of damages actions, analyses the causes for their under-utilization and attempts to find how to make them work better. Especially, the author tries to check whether and how far the Market Oversight Commission of Korea Exchange, as institution set up for the fairness, reliability and efficiency fo the capital market, could contribute to facilitating damages against unfair trades.

참고문헌 (13)

  1. 양기진, "자본시장법: 사례와 이론" (2012), 박영사
  2. 김용재, "자본시장과 법(상)" (2011), 고려대학교출판부
  3. 김정수, "자본시장법원론" (2011), 서울파이낸스앤로그룹
  4. , 2005
  5. 임재연, "자본시장법(2012년판)" (2012), 박영사
  6. 송종준, (2009), 한국증권법학회(박영사)
  7. 임채웅, "민사소송법의 전문심리위원제도에 관한 연구", 민사소송, 11(2), pp.176~202 (2007), 한국민사소송법학회
  8. 문병일, "해상사건에 있어서 전문심리위원제도의 허와 실", 해상보험법연구, 4(1) (2008), 해상보험법연구회
  9. 정영수, "민사소송에서의 전문심리위원에 관한 연구", 민사소송, 12(1), pp.170~200 (2008), 한국민사소송법학회
  10. 이동률, "소송구조의 현황과 개선방안", 민사소송, 14(2), pp.789~818 (2010), 한국민사소송법학회
  11. 최정식, "증권관련집단소송법의 개선방안에 관한 고찰", 저스티스, (102), pp.152~175 (2008), 한국법학원
  12. 김한종, "증권집단소송제도의 활성화방안에 관한 연구", 홍익법학, 10(3), pp.389~420 (2009), 법학연구소
  13. 손영화, "증권집단소송제도의 개선방안에 관한 고찰", 상사판례연구, 24(4), pp.45~86 (2011), 한국상사판례학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)