일본과 중국의 구분소유법제
Partitioned Ownership Acts of Japan and China
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
By promoting the development of the economy, urbanization and represents manyproblems. City concentration of many workers and triggered the housing shortage,the country of the city be searched for a package of measures to resolve them. Theproblem it is shown as a solution for complex building. And it regulates partitionedownership to the Act are to be made. Japan was partitioned ownership law was revised to 2002. Partitioned ownershiplaw was to complement the problems that had been widely debated during therevisions. March 2007, China established ‘the Law of Realty’ which was provided protectionof equity between state-owned property and private property rights. This Low iscomposed of 5 parts, 19 chapters, 247 atticles and supplementary provision. Amongthe rest, ‘Divided Ownership of building’ is prescribed in second part(ownership),6th chapter. To this dissertation, povisions about Divided Ownership of buildingwhich was prescribed in the Law of Realty of China and Partitioned Ownership lawof Japan were compared and analyzed.
Abstract
By promoting the development of the economy, urbanization and represents manyproblems. City concentration of many workers and triggered the housing shortage,the country of the city be searched for a package of measures to resolve them. Theproblem it is shown as a solution for complex building. And it regulates partitionedownership to the Act are to be made. Japan was partitioned ownership law was revised to 2002. Partitioned ownershiplaw was to complement the problems that had been widely debated during therevisions. March 2007, China established ‘the Law of Realty’ which was provided protectionof equity between state-owned property and private property rights. This Low iscomposed of 5 parts, 19 chapters, 247 atticles and supplementary provision. Amongthe rest, ‘Divided Ownership of building’ is prescribed in second part(ownership),6th chapter. To this dissertation, povisions about Divided Ownership of buildingwhich was prescribed in the Law of Realty of China and Partitioned Ownership lawof Japan were compared and analyzed.
참고문헌 (21)
- 鎌野邦樹, "일본의 현재 맨션의 법률문제 - 歐美와 아시아의 비교법 시점으로부터 -", 법학논총, 16(1), pp.67~92 (2009), 법학연구원
- 강혁신, "일본「재건축 원활화법」의 법률문제", 토지법학, 24(2), pp.165~198 (2008), 한국토지법학회
- 강혁신, "일본의 ‘건물의 구분소유 등에 관한 법률’에 있어서의 區分所有權의 動態", 민사법학, 43(1), pp.167~201 (2008), 한국민사법학회
- 강혁신, "일본의 맨션관리의 적정화 추진에 관한 법률 고찰", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 10(10), pp.294~303 (2010), 한국콘텐츠학회
- 김성화, "중국 건축물구분소유권제도의 현황과 쟁점", 법학논총, 16(1), pp.1~63 (2009), 법학연구원
- 박종두, "한 · 중 건물구분소유권법의 비교법적 고찰", 집합건물법학, (3) (2009), 한국집합건물법학회
- 靑山正明, "不動産法 第5卷 區分所有法" (1997), 青山書林
- 鎌野邦樹, "マンション法" (2003), 有斐閣
- 折田泰宏, "Q&Aマンション建替え法解說" (2003), 三省堂
- 坂和章平, "註解マンション建替え円滑化法" (2003), 靑林書院
- 鎌野邦紀, "改正區分所有法&建替え事業法の解說" (2004), 民事法硏究會
- 荒川重勝, "區分所有法" (2007), 大成出版社
- 千葉惠美子, "檢訂·新マンシヨン建替え決議制度-理論的時點から-", ジュリスト, (1249) (2003), 有斐閣
- 吉田徹, "建物の區分所有等に關する法律の一部改正について", 法律のひろば, 56(5) (2003), ぎょうせい
- 高田公生, "マンションの建替えの円滑化", 時の法令, (1682) (2003)
- 王利明, "中國民法典草案建議稿及說明" (2004), 中國法制出版社
- 梁慧星, "中國民法典草案建議稿附理由․ 物權編" (2004), 法律出版社
- 陝華彬, "物權法" (2004), 法律出版社
- 程信和, "房地産法" (2006), 北京大學出版社
- 梁慧星, "物權法" (2007), 法律出版社
- 江平, "中國物權法敎程" (2007), 知識産權出版社