본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

언론보도에 따른 범죄피해자의 2차 피해방지를 위한 법제 등의 검토와 그 개선방안

Review of the Legislative System etc. for the Prevention of Secondary Damages of Crime Victims Due to Media Reports and Their Improvement

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Nowadays, the commercialism of media being intensified, media’s crime reportsare getting more incendiary and lewder. When crime, especially in cases ofviolence to target woman and child such as a sexual assault or a child abuseoccur, the media reports on the identity of victims and due to this, victims gothrough secondary damages besides the direct damages caused by crimes. In the light of these cases, according to the acts on the woman and child assaultcases, it is banned to disclose identity of victims in media reports and when thisis violated, a criminal punishment can be given. Moreover, media organizationsincluding National Human Rights Commission of Korea prepare regulations andguidelines for crime reports and put a restrict on disclosure of identity of victims. In reality, however, it is not easy for victims to bring criminal accuse, to bring acivil action or to receive subsequent remedial measures through legal proceedingson 「Act on Arbitration and Remedies, etc. for Damage Caused by Press Reports」. Due to a scoop on excessive competition, media workers often do not followaccording acts or guidelines properly. Upon occasion, the workers do not recognizethe seriousness of secondary damages of victims caused by media reports. Therefore, to prevent secondary damages of victims effectively, the problems ofaccording the upper acts and guidelines should be complemented. For this, aboveall, in 「Act on Arbitration and Remedies, etc. for Damages Caused by PressReports」 and 「Crimes Victim Protection Act」, unified and concrete regulations toprevent secondary damages of victims should be prepared and the range of its applications should be enlarged. Also, the act which impose the civil-criminalresponsibility on news-person and media organizations who violate the upper actsshould be legislated. Furthermore, media organizations should strengthen theregulations by themselves autonomically, and in the case of violating the ban onidentity disclosure of victim, it is required for them to strengthen the regulationsby strict enforcement of their internal sanctions.

Abstract

Nowadays, the commercialism of media being intensified, media’s crime reportsare getting more incendiary and lewder. When crime, especially in cases ofviolence to target woman and child such as a sexual assault or a child abuseoccur, the media reports on the identity of victims and due to this, victims gothrough secondary damages besides the direct damages caused by crimes. In the light of these cases, according to the acts on the woman and child assaultcases, it is banned to disclose identity of victims in media reports and when thisis violated, a criminal punishment can be given. Moreover, media organizationsincluding National Human Rights Commission of Korea prepare regulations andguidelines for crime reports and put a restrict on disclosure of identity of victims. In reality, however, it is not easy for victims to bring criminal accuse, to bring acivil action or to receive subsequent remedial measures through legal proceedingson 「Act on Arbitration and Remedies, etc. for Damage Caused by Press Reports」. Due to a scoop on excessive competition, media workers often do not followaccording acts or guidelines properly. Upon occasion, the workers do not recognizethe seriousness of secondary damages of victims caused by media reports. Therefore, to prevent secondary damages of victims effectively, the problems ofaccording the upper acts and guidelines should be complemented. For this, aboveall, in 「Act on Arbitration and Remedies, etc. for Damages Caused by PressReports」 and 「Crimes Victim Protection Act」, unified and concrete regulations toprevent secondary damages of victims should be prepared and the range of its applications should be enlarged. Also, the act which impose the civil-criminalresponsibility on news-person and media organizations who violate the upper actsshould be legislated. Furthermore, media organizations should strengthen theregulations by themselves autonomically, and in the case of violating the ban onidentity disclosure of victim, it is required for them to strengthen the regulationsby strict enforcement of their internal sanctions.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. 여성·아동 폭력 보도와 관련한 언론의 2차 피해 방지를 위한 제도적 연구, "김서현", ~, pp.11-1270000-000827-01 (2014)
  2. 방송통신위원회, "제2기 방송통신위원회백서", ~ (2014)
  3. 강동범, "형법총론(제8판)" (2015), 박영사
  4. 이진국, "언론의 범죄보도와 형사법적 문제점" (2002), 한국형사정책연구원
  5. KBS, "KBS 방송제작 가이드라인", ~ (2007)
  6. 경찰청, "범죄피해자 보호 매뉴얼", ~ (2007)
  7. 강동욱, "강력범죄피의자 신상공개의 정당성여부에 대한 법적 검토", 한양법학, 20(26), pp.145~161 (2009), 한양법학회
  8. 강동욱, "강력범죄피의자 신상공개의 정당성여부에 관한 법리적 검토", 형사정책연구, 20(2), pp.5~28 (2009), 한국형사정책연구원
  9. 강동욱, "기업범죄에 있어서 법인의 책임과 배임죄의 성부", 한양법학, (30), pp.329~348 (2010), 한양법학회
  10. 강동욱, "형사재판에 있어서 공개주의의 의미와 그 내용에 관한 고찰", 한양법학, (31), pp.215~232 (2010), 한양법학회
  11. 강동욱, "형사재판에 대한 중계방송 제도도입의 문제점에 관한 고찰", 법과정책연구, 10(2), pp.613~629 (2010), 한국법정책학회
  12. 강동욱, "언론보도에 따른 피해자의 2차 피해 방지를 위한 제도와 그 개선방안", 홍익법학, 16(1), pp.451~477 (2015), 법학연구소[DOI]
  13. 권주희, "성폭력 피해생존자에 대한 2차 피해 실태 및 대책 - 형사사법절차-보도과정을 중심으로", 성폭력전문상담원 교육자료집 (2006), 한국성폭력상담소
  14. 김경호, "범죄보도로 인한 인격권으로서의 초상권 침해에 관한 연구:언론과 수사기관의 책임을 중심으로", 언론과 사회, 12(2), pp.88~120 (2004), 사단법인 언론과 사회
  15. 김한균, "강력범죄 보도와 피해자보호를 위한 가이드라인", 형사정책연구 소식 2012 여름, 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2012)
  16. 박지선, "언론의 범죄 관련 보도가 대중의 범죄 발생 인식에 미치는 영향", 경찰학논총, 8(1), pp.295~316 (2013), 경찰학연구소
  17. 류병관, "언론의 범죄보도에 있어 범죄피해자의 프라이버시권보호에 관한 연구", 피해자학연구, 18(1), pp.261~283 (2010), 한국피해자학회
  18. 이승선, "범죄보도로 인한 인격권의 침해와 문제점", 사회과학연구, 19(3), pp.65~94 (2008), 사회과학연구소
  19. 이천현, "언론매체를 통한 범죄피해자의 신원공개 실태 및 방지대책", 경찰학논총, 1(1), pp.101~118 (2006), 경찰학연구소
  20. 정문식, "재판방송의 헌법적 문제와 가능성 - 재판방송의 헌법적 정당성과 허용방안을 중심으로-", 법학논총, 31(1), pp.143~170 (2014), 법학연구소
  21. 조연하, "언론의 성적 선정적 보도와 여성의 인격권", 언론중재 2007 겨울, 언론중재위원회, ~ (2007)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)