자연재해법과 재난관리법의 통합에 관한 연구
A Study on the Annexation between Natural Disaster Law and Emergency Management Law
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Basic meteorological, hydrological, and geological circumstances have caused various natural hazards such as typhoons, floods, drought, landslides, and earthquakes, claiming a lot of deaths and enormous property losses all over the world. Especially, as many urban areas have increased development in hazard prone areas, it is more likely that losses of property from natural and technological disasters are rising. Specifically, according to the U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency, about 9.6 million U.S. households and property valued at $390 billion currently are at risk from a 1% annual chance of flooding in such locations. South Korea also experiences a number of typhoons, floods and landslides every year. The Korea National Emergency Management Agency concludes that in 2010 a total of 22 natural disasters happened across the country, which resulted in 14life losses and about property losses worth 4O billion won. Therefore, it’s vital to develop and maintain a proper emergency management system for governments to prevent disasters in advance or to reduce the impact of such catastrophes. Emergency management system is dependent on disaster regulations. Regulating mandates helps emergency managers to develop disaster plans ranging from comprehensive emergency management plans to hazard mitigation plans to disaster response plans. This research investigates how our nation’s two disaster laws, Natural Disaster Law and Emergency Management Law are specified and organized, figuring out what kinds of problems those laws have. Furthermore, this study suggests how the laws should be reorganized and what should be added to or deleted from the regulations.
Abstract
Basic meteorological, hydrological, and geological circumstances have caused various natural hazards such as typhoons, floods, drought, landslides, and earthquakes, claiming a lot of deaths and enormous property losses all over the world. Especially, as many urban areas have increased development in hazard prone areas, it is more likely that losses of property from natural and technological disasters are rising. Specifically, according to the U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency, about 9.6 million U.S. households and property valued at $390 billion currently are at risk from a 1% annual chance of flooding in such locations. South Korea also experiences a number of typhoons, floods and landslides every year. The Korea National Emergency Management Agency concludes that in 2010 a total of 22 natural disasters happened across the country, which resulted in 14life losses and about property losses worth 4O billion won. Therefore, it’s vital to develop and maintain a proper emergency management system for governments to prevent disasters in advance or to reduce the impact of such catastrophes. Emergency management system is dependent on disaster regulations. Regulating mandates helps emergency managers to develop disaster plans ranging from comprehensive emergency management plans to hazard mitigation plans to disaster response plans. This research investigates how our nation’s two disaster laws, Natural Disaster Law and Emergency Management Law are specified and organized, figuring out what kinds of problems those laws have. Furthermore, this study suggests how the laws should be reorganized and what should be added to or deleted from the regulations.
참고문헌 (23)
- 방재형국토 구축전략 연구, "건설교통부", 건설교통부, ~ (2000)
- 김선광, "보험계약자의 위험에 관한 고찰", 법과정책연구, (1(6)), pp.377~393 (2006), 한국법정책학회
- 소방방재청, "2008년, 주요 통계 및 자료", ~ (2008)
- 소방방재청, "2010년 재해 연보", ~ (2011)
- "자연재해대책법, 일부개정 2011.4.14 법률 제10599호", ~ (2011)
- "재난및안전관리기본법, 일부개정 2011.3.29 법률 제10467호", ~ (2011)
- 최병학, "우리나라 재난ㆍ재해관리시스템의 문제와 과제", 공공행정연구, 7(1) (2005)
- Chauncy Starr, "Social benefits vs. technological risk", Science, 165, pp.1232~1238 (1969)
- Drabek, "Emergency Management: Principles and Practice for Local Government", pp.xxi~ (1991)
- Enrico L. Quarantelli, "Assessing disaster preparedness planning: a set of criteria and their applicability to developing countries. Article No. 197", University of Delaware, 48~69 (1988)
- Francis O. Adeola, "Endangered community, enduring people: Toxic contamination, health, and adaptive responses in a local context", Environment and Behavior, 32, pp.209~249 (2000)
- Gilbert F. White, "Natural Hazards Research: Concepts, Methods, And Policy Implications", pp.3~16 (1974), Oxford University Press
- Ian Burton, "The Perception Of Natural Hazards In Resource Management", Natural Resources Journal, 3, pp.412~441 (1964)
- Kenneth Hewitt, "The Hazardousness of a Place; a Regional Ecology of Damaging Events", pp.1~20 (1971), University of Toronto Press
- Michael K. Lindell K, "Household adjustment to earthquake hazard: A review of research", Environment and Behavior, 32, pp.461~501 (2000)
- Paul Slovic, "Perception of risk", Science, 236, pp.280~285 (1987)
- Robert W. Kates, "Comparative Risk Analysis Of Technological Hazards (A Review)", Of The National Academy Of Sciences Of The United States Of America, 통권 : 80, pp.7027~7038 (1983)
- Seong-Nam Hwang, "Analysis of state emergency management agencies’ hazard analysis information on the Internet", International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 19, pp.85~106 (2001)
- Susan L. Cutter, "Living with risk: The geography of technological hazards" (1983), Edward Arnold
- Texas Division of Emergency Management,Hazard analysis, "Hazard analysis", Texas Department of Public Safety, ~ (2000)
- Thomas Drabek, "Human system responses to disaster: An inventory of sociological findings" (1986), Springer Verlag
- Ulrich Beck, "Living In The World Risk Society", Economy and Society, 35(3), pp.329~345 (2006)
- Vincent T. Covello, "The perception of technological risks: A literature review", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 23, pp.285~297 (1983)