법학교수의 법관임용에 관한 소고
An Essay on the Appointment of Law Professors for the Bench in Korea
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This essay is on the appointment of law professors for the judgeship in the current Korean situation. According to the laws and regulations in Korean judicial system, only the licensed-law practitioners have been qualified to be appointed for the judgeship. In order to reform this system, Korean law professors have insisted to give them law practitioner’s license for the past 50 years. The author criticizes that the long-standing alternative of Korean law professors has very weak ground and rationale. With theoretical and sociological arguments, he suggests that the law professors who have Ph. D. in Law and serve more than 10 years in the University should be qualified to have judgeship in Korea. The new alternative could serve for the Korean law professors to overcome a kind of identity crisis that the new professional law school system has brought in Korean legal profession since 2009.
Abstract
This essay is on the appointment of law professors for the judgeship in the current Korean situation. According to the laws and regulations in Korean judicial system, only the licensed-law practitioners have been qualified to be appointed for the judgeship. In order to reform this system, Korean law professors have insisted to give them law practitioner’s license for the past 50 years. The author criticizes that the long-standing alternative of Korean law professors has very weak ground and rationale. With theoretical and sociological arguments, he suggests that the law professors who have Ph. D. in Law and serve more than 10 years in the University should be qualified to have judgeship in Korea. The new alternative could serve for the Korean law professors to overcome a kind of identity crisis that the new professional law school system has brought in Korean legal profession since 2009.
참고문헌 (12)
- 김창록, "로스쿨에서의 이론교육과 실무교육", 법과사회, (35), pp.9~26 (2008), 법과사회이론학회
- 연기영, "法學敎授에 대한 辯護士資格附與에 관한 연구", 중앙법학, 7(1), pp.341~365 (2005), 중앙법학회
- 이계일, "수사학적 법이론의 관점에서 본 법적 논증의 구조", 법철학연구, 13(1), pp.35~88 (2010), 한국법철학회
- 이계일, "변화된 법학교육체제 하 법철학 교육의 현황과 과제", 법사학연구, (43), pp.043~100 (2011), 한국법사학회
- 이국운, "사법개혁의 정치학 - 법률가양성제도개혁논의의 정치적 함의 -", 저스티스, 73, pp.5~25 (2003), 한국법학원
- 이국운, "기초법학교육의 제도적 강화론", 인권과 정의, (334), pp.109~121 (2004), 대한변호사협회
- 이국운, "법학교수 호시절은 끝났다", 시사인, (21) (2008)
- 정용상, "실질적 법률가일원화를 위한 법정책적 제안 - 법학교수의 변호사자격부여를 위한 변호사법개정과 관련하여 -", 법과정책연구, 9(2), pp.905~923 (2009), 한국법정책학회
- 최대권, "법사회학의 이론과 방법" (1995), 일신사
- 松井康浩, "法曹一元論" (1992), 日本評論社
- Charles Fried, "The Artificial Reason of The Law or ‘What Lawyers Know", Tex. L. Rev, 60, pp.35~ (1981)
- "법학교수에게 변호사자격부여에 대한 찬반 논쟁, 찬성론－송희성(수원대학교 법정대학장, 법학박사), 반대론－김주원(대한변협 총무이사 겸 사무총장)", 고시계 (2003)