본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

유료도로의 하자로 인해 발생한 손해와 청구권 - 손해전보를 위한 私法的 관점에서 접근의 시도 -

A Study on Damages caused by defects in the toll road and claim - Approach from the point of view of compensation for damages -

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Our first highway was built in 1968 between Seoul and Incheon in South Korea. But currently we have the superhighway network based on the rapid economic growth. In my opinion, anyone can not deny that the change improves the quality of life. Because of the importance of highway studies on the highway have not stopped. Equally the field of law cares deeply about the highway and problems about the highway is discussed by Jurist. They focus a debate on a relationship between State Compensation Act and Civil Act because of a difference of meaning, also structure in Civil Act and public structure in State Compensation Act. Art. 5 State Compensation Act: (1) In case any damage has been inflicted on another person due to defective construction or management of road, river or any other public structures, the State or local governments shall redress such damage. The provisions of the proviso of Art. 2 (1) and Art. 3 and 3-2 shall apply mutatis mutandis to this case. (2)In the case as referred to in paragraph (1), if there exists any other person who is to assume the liability for the cause of the damage, the State or local governments may claim indemnity from him. Art. 758 Civil Act: (1) If any damages have been caused to another person by reason of any defect in the construction or maintenance of a structure, the person in possession of the structure shall be liable for such damages. Provided, that if the person in possession has exercised due care in order to prevent the occurrence of such damages, compensation for the damage shall be made by the owner. (2) The provisions of paragraph (1) shall apply mutatis mutandis where there exists any defect in the planting or maintenance of trees. (3) In cases of paragraphs (1) and (2), the possessor or owner may exercise the right to obtain reimbursement from the person to whom the damages are attributable. This Article explained this relationship with general law and special law. In this Article it is proved why State Compensation Act is a special law. It tells its own tale that a special statute prevails over a general one. In this sense the application of Civil Act must be denied. Then a general tendency about Public-private partnership and his necessity were explained. In addition to this explain, obligations under the contract between highway user and State/Korea Expressway Corporation or private investor for PPP were evaluated.

Abstract

Our first highway was built in 1968 between Seoul and Incheon in South Korea. But currently we have the superhighway network based on the rapid economic growth. In my opinion, anyone can not deny that the change improves the quality of life. Because of the importance of highway studies on the highway have not stopped. Equally the field of law cares deeply about the highway and problems about the highway is discussed by Jurist. They focus a debate on a relationship between State Compensation Act and Civil Act because of a difference of meaning, also structure in Civil Act and public structure in State Compensation Act. Art. 5 State Compensation Act: (1) In case any damage has been inflicted on another person due to defective construction or management of road, river or any other public structures, the State or local governments shall redress such damage. The provisions of the proviso of Art. 2 (1) and Art. 3 and 3-2 shall apply mutatis mutandis to this case. (2)In the case as referred to in paragraph (1), if there exists any other person who is to assume the liability for the cause of the damage, the State or local governments may claim indemnity from him. Art. 758 Civil Act: (1) If any damages have been caused to another person by reason of any defect in the construction or maintenance of a structure, the person in possession of the structure shall be liable for such damages. Provided, that if the person in possession has exercised due care in order to prevent the occurrence of such damages, compensation for the damage shall be made by the owner. (2) The provisions of paragraph (1) shall apply mutatis mutandis where there exists any defect in the planting or maintenance of trees. (3) In cases of paragraphs (1) and (2), the possessor or owner may exercise the right to obtain reimbursement from the person to whom the damages are attributable. This Article explained this relationship with general law and special law. In this Article it is proved why State Compensation Act is a special law. It tells its own tale that a special statute prevails over a general one. In this sense the application of Civil Act must be denied. Then a general tendency about Public-private partnership and his necessity were explained. In addition to this explain, obligations under the contract between highway user and State/Korea Expressway Corporation or private investor for PPP were evaluated.

참고문헌 (41)

  1. 김남진, "행정법 I" (2003), 법문사
  2. 김동희, "행정법Ⅰ" (2008), 박영사
  3. 박균성, "행정법론(상)" (2008), 박영사
  4. 천병태, "행정구제법" (1997), 삼영사
  5. 홍정선, "행정법특강" (2013), 박영사
  6. 강정규, "고속도로 교통안전 현황 및 대책", 월간손해보험, (532) (2013), 손해보험협회
  7. 강현호, "국가배상법제 5조의 하자의 의미", 성균관법학, 16(1), pp.309~332 (2004), 법학연구소
  8. 김기진, "국가배상의 주체에 관한 연구", 연세법학연구, 9(2) (2003), 연세대학교 법학연구원
  9. 김동희, "국가배상법 제5조상의 영조물의 설치·관리상 하자의 개념", 법학, 43(1) (2002), 서울대학교 법학연구소
  10. 김명길, "國家賠償法의 營造物責任의 배분을 위한 試論", 법학연구, 47(2), pp.163~190 (2007), 법학연구소
  11. 김성필, "공작물책임의 입법적 검토", 법과정책연구, 5(2), pp.859~876 (2005), 한국법정책학회
  12. 김중권, "국가배상법상의 과실책임주의의 해석전환을 위한 소고", 법학논집, 635 (2009), 법조
  13. 류광해, "판례에 나타난 도로의 하자", 원광법학, 25(1), pp.315~340 (2009), 법학연구소
  14. 박신, "유료고속도로의 성격과 법적 문제", 법학논총, 24(1), pp.341~373 (2011), 법학연구소
  15. 박신, "미국에서의 도로 설치·관리에 따른 배상책임에 관한 연구", 공법연구, 30(4), pp.12~12 (2002), 한국공법학회
  16. 박신, "고속국도 설치·관리상 하자의 의미와 유형에 관한 연구 (III)", 인천법학논총, 4 (2001), 인천대학교법학연구소
  17. 박 신, "한국도로공사의 법적 지위 (IV)", 고속도로, (57) (1998), 한국도로공사
  18. 박신욱, "도핑으로 인한 스폰서 계약의 침해와 위약금을 통한 스폰서 보호에 관한 연구", 법학연구, 15(3), pp.499~525 (2012), 법학연구소
  19. 반흥식, "표현증명 -독일도로교통법상에 있어서의 표현증명을 중심으로-", 원광법학, 25(2), pp.9~34 (2009), 법학연구소
  20. 배윤신, "서울시 도로포장 실태 및 개선방안", 정책리포트, (127) (2012), 서울연구원
  21. 손삼락, "도로의 관리 보존의 하자", 공군법률논집, 4 (2000), 공군본부공군법무감실
  22. 송기춘, "국가배상법 제2조 제1항 단서에 대한 법원 및 헌법재판소의 해석과 헌법 제29조 제2항의 개정론", 헌법학연구, 7(4) (2001), 한국헌법학회
  23. 송희성, "국가배상법상 몇 가지 문제점 (I)", 공법학연구, 4(1) (2002), 한국비교공법학회
  24. 송희성, "국가배상법에서 몇 가지 문제 (II)", 법제 (2006), 법제처
  25. 안상현, "민간투자법에 의한 공물의 공급·관리", 법제 (2002), 법제처
  26. 양승업, "지방자치단체의 공공시설에 대한 입장료 및 사용료 징수에 관한 고찰", 공법학연구, 8(4), pp.381~406 (2007), 한국비교공법학회
  27. 윤성현, "부담금의 위헌심사기준에 관한 헌법이론적 재검토", 공법학연구, 13(1), pp.249~280 (2012), 한국비교공법학회
  28. 윤재만, "憲法的 基本權으로서의 道路通行權", 토지공법연구, 34, pp.229~252 (2006), 한국토지공법학회
  29. 이경하, "아스팔트 포장의 파손 현황 및 저감대책", 도로, 14(3) (2012), 한국도로학회
  30. 이광윤, "공기업의 입찰참가자격제한행위의 법적 성질", 법제 (2001), 법제처
  31. 李 濬 熙, "道路의 設置上의 瑕疵로 인한 管理廳의 損害賠償責任", 저스티스, (80), pp.156~174 (2004), 한국법학원
  32. 이호용, "공공요금의 규제와 한계에 관한 법정책적 연구", 법학연구, 50(2), pp.173~202 (2009), 법학연구소
  33. 전극수, "폭설로 인한 고속도로의 정체와 손해배상책임에 관한 연구 - 판례평석 : 대법원 2008. 3. 13. 선고 2007다29287,29294 판결 -", 민사법학, 43(1), pp.369~397 (2008), 한국민사법학회
  34. 정광정, "도로소음공해와 도로하자책임에 관한 연구", 법학연구, (17), pp.167~185 (2004), 한국법학회
  35. 정종철, "도로의 설치ㆍ관리의 하자로 인한 손해배상책임에 관한 고찰", 법학논총, 20(1), pp.181~223 (2007), 법학연구소
  36. 정하중, "국가배상법의 문제점과 개선방향", 서강법학, 9 (2007), 서강대학교 법학연구소
  37. 진정훈, "지자체 도로포장 파손 행태 및 대책 방안", 도로, 14(3) (2012), 한국도로학회
  38. 홍성필, "용어풀이(64)", 월간 국토, (266) (2003), 국토연구원
  39. 문상원, "국가배상법의 특별사법으로서의 성격", 한국재산법학회 발표자료 (2008)
  40. 통계청, "국제통계연감", ~ (2012)
  41. 고속도로 설치·관리상 법적책임의 유형 및 범위에 관한 연구, "한국도로공사", ~ (2012)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)