본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

주주권 강화를 위한 전자투표제도의 법적 과제

The legal issues of the electronic ballot system to strengthenthe right of shareholders

0

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

In a stock company which is established with the issuance of shares, the general meeting of shareholders is both the foremost decision making organization and the management supervisory organization in the company, through which shareholders can participate in the management of the company made with the payment. It is also one of the systems for the democratization of economy. So, it is important to enable the electronic ballot system to actively be adopted in this IT period as it contributes to the strengthening of the right of shareholders. The electronic ballot system is a system in which the shareholders can cast their votes regardless of where they are located. As it is easy to exercise the votes under this system, it can be said as one way of strengthening the rights of shareholders. But in reality, even though this system was introduced 4 years ago, only 45 companies have adopted the system. In addition, most of the companies which adopted the system are the special purpose companies or the ship investing companies. If a system is not adopted even though the system has been available, it cannot be used for the shareholders. Therefore, it is desirable to make the adoption of the system mandatory for the protection of the shareholders' right. For the facilitation of the electronic ballot system, there are something to be solved in advance, including the relation with the written votes, exercise of votes through proxy and exercise of votes in disunity. Also, the revocation, and change in electronic voting shall be allowed to reflect the true intention of the shareholders in the votes. In addition, it is desirable to specifically describe the diversification of identity confirmation process, period of exercise of the electronic voting and the responsibilities and the electronic voting management committee in the related laws. The bill for the mandatory adoption of the electronic ballot system has been submitted to National Assembly by an assemblyman and even the ministry of justice is also trying to pass the bill as one of their targets. So, it is expected that the adoption of mandatory electronic ballot system would be the law soon. If the bill is made into the official law, the system would lead to the activation of the general meeting of general shareholders and the general meeting of shareholders becoming the upper decision making institutions of the company.

Abstract

In a stock company which is established with the issuance of shares, the general meeting of shareholders is both the foremost decision making organization and the management supervisory organization in the company, through which shareholders can participate in the management of the company made with the payment. It is also one of the systems for the democratization of economy. So, it is important to enable the electronic ballot system to actively be adopted in this IT period as it contributes to the strengthening of the right of shareholders. The electronic ballot system is a system in which the shareholders can cast their votes regardless of where they are located. As it is easy to exercise the votes under this system, it can be said as one way of strengthening the rights of shareholders. But in reality, even though this system was introduced 4 years ago, only 45 companies have adopted the system. In addition, most of the companies which adopted the system are the special purpose companies or the ship investing companies. If a system is not adopted even though the system has been available, it cannot be used for the shareholders. Therefore, it is desirable to make the adoption of the system mandatory for the protection of the shareholders' right. For the facilitation of the electronic ballot system, there are something to be solved in advance, including the relation with the written votes, exercise of votes through proxy and exercise of votes in disunity. Also, the revocation, and change in electronic voting shall be allowed to reflect the true intention of the shareholders in the votes. In addition, it is desirable to specifically describe the diversification of identity confirmation process, period of exercise of the electronic voting and the responsibilities and the electronic voting management committee in the related laws. The bill for the mandatory adoption of the electronic ballot system has been submitted to National Assembly by an assemblyman and even the ministry of justice is also trying to pass the bill as one of their targets. So, it is expected that the adoption of mandatory electronic ballot system would be the law soon. If the bill is made into the official law, the system would lead to the activation of the general meeting of general shareholders and the general meeting of shareholders becoming the upper decision making institutions of the company.

참고문헌 (32)

  1. 김순석, "전자주주총회" (2008), 전남대학교출판부
  2. 송옥렬, "상법강의(제3판)" (2013), 홍문사
  3. 이철송, "회사법강의(제21판)" (2013), 박영사
  4. 임재연, "회사법" (2012), 박영사
  5. 임재연, "자본시장법" (2012), 박영사
  6. 정찬형, "상법강의(상)(제15판)" (2012), 박영사
  7. 최준선, "회사법 제7판" (2012), 삼영사
  8. 한국상사법학회, "서면투표와 전자투표, In 주식회사법대계Ⅱ" (2013), 법문사
  9. 한국상사법학회, "전자주주총회, In 주식회사법대계Ⅱ" (2013), 법문사
  10. 권종호, "전자투표제도의 단계적 의무화의 필요성과 그 이유", 한국경제법학회 하계 학술대회 (2013)
  11. 김병태, "주주총회의 전자투표제도 의무화와 문제점" (2013)
  12. 김순석, "株主 議決權 行使의 電子化에 따른 法的 課題 ― 2009年 改正商法을 中心으로 ―", 서울법학, 18(1), pp.273~318 (2010), 서울시립대학교 법학연구소
  13. 김원희, "예탁결제원의 의결권 대리행사 필요성에 관한 연구", POSRI경영경제연구, 12(1), pp.5~24 (2012), 포스코경영연구소[DOI]
  14. 김재범, "주주총회 운영의 개선과제", 상사판례연구, (16), pp.169~200 (2004), 한국상사판례학회
  15. 김지환, "한국형 기업지배구조의 바람직한 모습", 건국대학교 법학연구소 공동학술대회 (2013)
  16. 박철영, "의결권 행사의 전자화와 Shadow Voting", 상사법연구, 29(4), pp.89~136 (2011), 한국상사법학회
  17. 유춘화, "자본시장법 개정에 즈음하여", 예탁결제, (87) (2013), 한국예탁결제원
  18. 이세영, "주주총회의 전자화에 관한 법적 연구", 박사, 상사법, pp.2011
  19. 정승화, "의결권 행사의 전자화와 그 활성화를 위한 법적 과제", 기업법연구, 26(2), pp.117~155 (2012), 한국기업법학회[DOI]
  20. 정완용, "주주의 의결권행사의 전자화에 관한 고찰", 상사법연구, 28(3), pp.377~406 (2009), 한국상사법학회
  21. 정준우, "주주의 의결권 행사방법의 편의성 제고와 그 문제점", 법학연구, 13(3), pp.1~44 (2010), 법학연구소
  22. 정찬형, "주식회사법 개정제안", 선진상사법률연구, (49), pp.1~66 (2010), 법무부
  23. 정쾌영, "주주총회의 전자화에 관한 입법론적 고찰", 상사법연구, 21(3) (2002), 한국상사법학회
  24. 허항진, "개정상법상 전자투표제도와 주요 법적 논점에 대한 소고", 법학연구, (38), pp.299~324 (2010), 한국법학회
  25. 2012년 19대 정기국회 입법과제 3 : 주주권 강화 방안, "경제개혁연구소", ~, pp.경제개혁리포트 2012-07 (2012)
  26. 법무부, "기업지배구조 상법개정공청회 자료집 토론문", ~ (2013)
  27. 법무부, "기업지배구조 상법개정 2차 공청회 자료집 토론문", ~ (2013)
  28. 한국기업지배구조원, "기업지배구조백서 2012" (2012)
  29. 한국상장회사협의회, "2012 상장회사 주주총회백서" (2012)
  30. 박근혜정부 국정목표 및 국정과제, "제18대 대통령직인수위원회", ~ (2013)
  31. 依馬直義, "機關投資家による議決權行使の狀況", 商事法務, (1986) (2012), 商事法務硏究會
  32. "株主總會白書", 商事法務, (1983) (2012), 商事法務硏究會

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)