Linguistic Features of Donald Trump’s Political Discourse: Focusing on Genre Differences and Change over Time
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
US President Donald Trump’s language has been characterized by easy and repeated words, short sentences, and incohesive content. However, some studies have suggested that his language does not always show those linguistic features. This study addressed this unresolved issue by analyzing Trump’s language use by genre (interviews vs. presidential speeches) from various linguistic dimensions, before and during his presidency. Results showed that while his interviews were generally simple in terms of both lexicon and syntax, his presidential speeches showed similar degrees of lexical and syntactic complexity with his three predecessors. Furthermore, his speeches have tended to become more lexically and syntactically complicated since his election. In terms of text cohesion, his interviews showed higher cohesion than those of his three predecessors, although text cohesion of his speeches was similar with them. These results contest the existing assessment that Trump’s language is linguistically simple and incohesive, suggesting that the characteristics of his political discourse should be redefined by genre in terms of language complexity and text cohesion.
Abstract
US President Donald Trump’s language has been characterized by easy and repeated words, short sentences, and incohesive content. However, some studies have suggested that his language does not always show those linguistic features. This study addressed this unresolved issue by analyzing Trump’s language use by genre (interviews vs. presidential speeches) from various linguistic dimensions, before and during his presidency. Results showed that while his interviews were generally simple in terms of both lexicon and syntax, his presidential speeches showed similar degrees of lexical and syntactic complexity with his three predecessors. Furthermore, his speeches have tended to become more lexically and syntactically complicated since his election. In terms of text cohesion, his interviews showed higher cohesion than those of his three predecessors, although text cohesion of his speeches was similar with them. These results contest the existing assessment that Trump’s language is linguistically simple and incohesive, suggesting that the characteristics of his political discourse should be redefined by genre in terms of language complexity and text cohesion.
참고문헌 (30)
- Ahmadian, S., "Explaining Donald Trump via communication style: Grandiosity, informality, and dynamism", Personality and Individual Differences, 107, pp.49~53 (2017)
- Al-Saeedi, H. M. A., "The function of repetition in Trump’s inaugural address:A discourse analysis study", Journal of College of Education, 2017, pp.1(28), 709~732
- (2019)[URL]
- Aswad, N. G., "Exploring charismatic leadership: A comparative analysis of the rhetoric of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election", Presidential Studies Quarterly, 49(1), pp.56~74 (2019)
- Chen, W., "A critical discourse analysis of Donald Trump’s inaugural speech from the perspective of systemic functional grammar", Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 8(8), pp.966~972 (2018)
- "Explaining Donald Trump’s massive branding power" (2016)[URL]
- Dalman, A. S., "A corpus analysis of Donald Trump’s political communications", International Journal of Current Research, 9(11), pp.61802~61807 (2017)
- Graesser, A. C., "Coh-Metrix:Analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behavior Research Methods", Instruments, & Computers, 36(2), pp.193~202 (2004)
- "Donald Trump’s strange speaking style, as explained by linguists" (2016)[URL]
- "Does Trump have a low verbal ability? Let’s look at his language from a linguistic standpoint" (2018)[URL]
- "Trump’s language shifts from ‘I’ to ‘we’ in State of the Union address" (2018)[URL]
- Kayam, O., "The readability and simplicity of Donald Trump’s language", Political Studies Review, 16(1), pp.73~88 (2018)
- Derivation of new readability formulas (Automated readability index, fog count and flesch reading ease formula) for navy enlisted personnel, "Kincaid, J. P.", CNTECHTRA, ~, pp.Research Branch Report no. 8-75 (1975)
- Kvítková, A., "Textual patterns and idiolect: A corpus-assisted study of individual textual profiles of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump", Doctoral, pp.2018
- "Understanding Trump" (2016)[URL]
- Landauer, T., "Handbook of latent semantic analysis" (2007), Erlbaum
- "The rhetorical style of spontaneous speech" (2016)[URL]
- Lu, X., "A corpus-based evaluation of syntactic complexity measures as indices of college level ESL writers’ language development", TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), pp.36~62 (2011)
- McNamara, D. S., "Automated evaluation of text and discourse with Coh-Metrix" (2014), Cambridge University Press
- "How Donald Trump answers a question" (2015)[URL]
- "Trump’s aphasia" (2015)[URL]
- Savoy, J., "Analysis of the style and the rhetoric of the 2016 US presidential primaries", Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 33(1), pp.143~159 (2017)
- Savoy, J., "Trump’s and Clinton’s style and rhetoric during the 2016presidential election", Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 25(2), pp.168~189 (2017)[DOI]
- Scott, M., "Wordsmith: Software Tools for Windows" (1997), Oxford University Press
- "Lexical Analysis Software", 2011
- Sclafani, J., "Talking Donald Trump: A sociolinguistic study of style, metadiscourse, and political identity" (2017), Routledge
- "One year of Trump: Linguistics expert analyses US President’s influence on language" (2018)[URL]
- "How Donald Trump’s language works for him" (2015)[URL]
- Tchaparian, V., "Linguistic analysis of the two speech functions in President Donald Trump’s inaugural speech", Armenian Folia Anglistika, pp.111~118 (2017)
- Wang, Y. Q., "Is Trump always rambling like a fourth-grade student? An analysis of stylistic features of Donald Trump’s political discourse during the 2016 election", Discourse and Society, 29(3), pp.299~323 (2018)