해방기 남북한의 아동담론과 아동문학 텍스트의 상관성 연구
A Study of Interrelationship between Discourse on Children and Children’s Literauture Text of South and North Korea in the Liberation Period
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article is for educational discourse and reality Liberation Period Children gave any impact on children’s literature, children’s literature has sought to internalize salpigo whether this in any way. This contemporary children’s literature is sought to be examined has studied how children approach seotneunga on the actual life and reality On the other hand, Liberation Period peculiarities of children’s literature by approaching both the South and North Korean Liberation Period and the totality of children’s literature. Liberation Period discourse surrounding this educational philosophy and institutions of the two Koreas, that can be deployed in the nature and impact of the United States and the Soviet Union in each of the selected systems. In the case of South Korea Tangun and to summons While advocating a nationalist ideology education by naeseum the ‘Hongik human,’ and expand the US Military Government Agency under the influence education policy. North Korea also showed the figure to be converted into a training in South Korea was a Japanese leftist common interest and liquidated the remnants of feudal remnants and education but stressed that mainly nationalist reject others, 238 아동청소년문학연구 제19호(2016. 12) “received idolized” and the Soviet biased contents of the series. Maintenance efforts and the lives of Liberation Period of children’s educational philosophy and different institutions had been exposed to intact honransang of Liberation Period. Child labor and begging that they were overflowing natjiman solve this lack of policies and facilities. If one of the school students were exposed to the commercial publishing market with a shortage of textbooks and related flooding geominjeong of national reference textbooks. In the case of North Korea it can gauge more to a lack of data, but there were no circumstances accompany the incendiary one side of the South. South of the Liberation Period children’s literature has been emphasizing the work they have implemented a healthy child is responsible for the future of the willingness to solve the same problem some eoteuna demonstrate the influence of textbooks Tianjin bright one child, people. Children’s literature textbooks were adopted in the subsequent power outage is stepping out of the way typical of the South Korean children’s literature. In the case of North Korea by introducing children to the ideals and goals of the system it was naegoja raised doubts about the system, not the child.
Abstract
This article is for educational discourse and reality Liberation Period Children gave any impact on children’s literature, children’s literature has sought to internalize salpigo whether this in any way. This contemporary children’s literature is sought to be examined has studied how children approach seotneunga on the actual life and reality On the other hand, Liberation Period peculiarities of children’s literature by approaching both the South and North Korean Liberation Period and the totality of children’s literature. Liberation Period discourse surrounding this educational philosophy and institutions of the two Koreas, that can be deployed in the nature and impact of the United States and the Soviet Union in each of the selected systems. In the case of South Korea Tangun and to summons While advocating a nationalist ideology education by naeseum the ‘Hongik human,’ and expand the US Military Government Agency under the influence education policy. North Korea also showed the figure to be converted into a training in South Korea was a Japanese leftist common interest and liquidated the remnants of feudal remnants and education but stressed that mainly nationalist reject others, 238 아동청소년문학연구 제19호(2016. 12) “received idolized” and the Soviet biased contents of the series. Maintenance efforts and the lives of Liberation Period of children’s educational philosophy and different institutions had been exposed to intact honransang of Liberation Period. Child labor and begging that they were overflowing natjiman solve this lack of policies and facilities. If one of the school students were exposed to the commercial publishing market with a shortage of textbooks and related flooding geominjeong of national reference textbooks. In the case of North Korea it can gauge more to a lack of data, but there were no circumstances accompany the incendiary one side of the South. South of the Liberation Period children’s literature has been emphasizing the work they have implemented a healthy child is responsible for the future of the willingness to solve the same problem some eoteuna demonstrate the influence of textbooks Tianjin bright one child, people. Children’s literature textbooks were adopted in the subsequent power outage is stepping out of the way typical of the South Korean children’s literature. In the case of North Korea by introducing children to the ideals and goals of the system it was naegoja raised doubts about the system, not the child.
참고문헌 (55)
- "교육과학", ~
- "아동문학집", ~
- "문학", ~
- "별나라", ~
- "소학생", ~
- "신세대", ~
- "신천지", ~
- "아동문학", ~
- "아동문화", ~
- "아동", ~
- "인민교육", ~
- "인민", ~
- "경향신문", ~
- "동아일보", ~
- "민보", ~
- "중앙신문", ~
- 강명숙, "6-3-3-4제 단선형 학제 도입의 이념적 성격", 한국교육사학, 26(2), pp.7~30 (2004), 한국교육사학회
- 강진호, "해방기 ‘국어’ 교과서와 탈식민주의 －『초등 국어교본』을 중심으로－", 문학교육학, (30), pp.97~126 (2009), 한국문학교육학회
- 권성아, "해방 이후 교육이념의 설정과 국사교육", 역사와교육, (21), pp.129~186 (2015), 역사교과서연구소
- 김용일, "미군정기 조선교육심의회에 관한 교육정치학적 고찰", 교육문제연구, 6, pp.315~347 (1994)
- 김유진, "『소학생』의 성격 연구 - 학교 교육과의 관련성을 중심으로", 아동청소년문학연구, (8), pp.69~91 (2011), 한국아동청소년문학학회
- 김재웅, "‘여성’·‘어린이’·‘섹스’를 통해 본 해방 후 북한의 가족문화", 한국근현대사연구, (71), pp.212~245 (2014), 한국근현대사학회
- 김종헌, "윤복진 동시의 담론 구성체 연구", 한국아동문학연구, 12, pp.81~104 (2006)
- 문혜윤, "해방기 국어 교재를 통해 본 국어와 정전의 형성", 우리어문연구, (51), pp.73~101 (2015), 우리어문학회[DOI]
- 박영기, "해방기 아동문학교육 연구", 청람어문교육, (41), pp.413~448 (2010), 청람어문교육학회
- 박태일, "나라잃은시기 아동잡지로 본 경남·부산지역 아동문학", 한국문학논총, (37), pp.149~200 (2004), 한국문학회
- 선안나, "문단 형성기 아동문학장의 고찰- 반공주의를 중심으로 -", 동화와 번역, (12), pp.129~161 (2006), 동화와번역연구소
- 신창호, "敎育理念으로서 弘益人間에 대한 비판적 검토", 한국교육학연구, 9(1), pp.51~69 (2003), 안암교육학회
- 신효숙, "소련군정기 북한의 교육개혁", 현대북한연구, 2(1), pp.155~217 (1999)
- 신효숙, "해방 후 북한 고등교육체계의 형성과 특징: 김일성 종합대학의 창립과 운영을 중심으로", 북한연구학회보, 2(2), pp.195~224 (1998)
- 오새내, "해방 후, 최초의 국정교과서 『바둑이와 철수』(박창해 저, 1948) 편찬의 국어학사적 맥락 연구 -고(故) 박창해 구술 자료를 중심으로-", 우리어문연구, (49), pp.283~316 (2014), 우리어문학회
- 오성철, "한국 학제 제정 과정의 특질, 1945〜1951", 한국교육사학, 37(4), pp.47~69 (2015), 한국교육사학회[DOI]
- 오일환, "북한 교육이념의 변천과정에 관한 연구", 통일교육연구, (3), pp.95~124 (2003)
- 원종찬, "‘일하는 아이들’과 ‘유희정신’을 넘어서", 창비어린이, (창간), pp.37~ (2003)
- 원종찬, "윤석중과 이원수-아동문학의 모더니즘과 리얼리즘-", 아동청소년문학연구, (9), pp.7~38 (2011), 한국아동청소년문학학회
- 이동배, "해방 후 시기의 남북한 초등국어 교과서 비교연구", 새국어교육, (83), pp.337~356 (2009), 한국국어교육학회[DOI]
- 이봉범, "해방공간의 문화사－일상문화의 실연(實演)과 그 의미", 상허학보, 26, pp.13~54 (2009), 상허학회
- 임성규, "미군정기 초등학교 국어교재 수록 아동문학 제재 연구 - 『초등 국어교본』을 중심으로", 국어교육연구, (44), pp.103~128 (2009), 국어교육학회(since1969)[DOI]
- 장만호, "박남수론:한 월남 문인의 이력과 ‘純粹’의 이면 ― 수기와 전집 미수록 시를 중심으로", 한국시학연구, (32), pp.173~202 (2011), 한국시학회[DOI]
- 정선혜, "해방기 소년소설에 나타난 아동상 탐색 : 아동잡지에 게재된 소년소설을 중심으로", 한국아동문학연구, (26), pp.93~134 (2014), 한국아동문학학회
- 정종현, "단군, 조선학 그리고 과학: 식민지 지식인의 보편을 향한 열망의 기호들", 한국학연구, (28), pp.315~352 (2012), 한국학연구소
- 조은숙, "이원수의 친일 아동문학과 작가론 구성 논리에 대한 재검토", 우리어문연구, (40), pp.545~585 (2011), 우리어문학회
- 조은숙, "한국 아동문학의 형성과정 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.2005
- 차경수, "북한의 교육내용과 현황—교육이념과 기본정책", 북한, (98), pp.58~117 (1980)
- 최미선, "해방기 장편 아동서사의 현실인식 연구", 한국아동문학연구, (29), pp.217~243 (2015), 한국아동문학학회
- 최은경, "교과서 동요․동시 정전화(正典化) 연구－미군정기~교수요목기를 중심으로－", 문학교육학, (45), pp.459~488 (2014), 한국문학교육학회
- 한민주, "어린 혁명가들을 위한 과학: 마르크시즘, 진화론, 프롤레타리아 아동 문학(1920-1935)", 한국과학사학회지, 37(1), pp.209~234 (2015), 한국과학사학회
- 허원구, "미군정시대의 복지정책에 관한 연구", 복지행정론총, 2, pp.115~236 (1992)
- 허재영, "과도기의 국어과 교과서", 교육한글, 16・17, pp.59~90 (2004)
- 가라타니 고진, "일본 근대문학의 기원" (2010), 도서출판b
- 박남수, "赤治六年의 北韓文壇" (1952), 국민사상지도원
- 백낙준, "한국의 현실과 이상 상" (1963), 연세대학교출판부
- 원종찬, "북한의 아동문학" (2012), 청동거울
- 윤석중, "초생달" (1946), 박문출판사
- 이재철, "한국현대아동문학사" (1978), 일지사