본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

서사의 변주 - 게사르전 영문 번역본

The variation of Epic - English translation for King Gesar

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

본 논문에서 필자는 게사르전 번역의 역사적 과정과 게사르전의 영문번역본에 대해서 연구하였다. 특히 게사르전의 티베트어 영어번역본과 몽골어 영어번역본을 비교하면서 두 번역본에 나타나는 차이를 고찰하였다. 이를 통해 게사르학을 포함하는 실크로드학의 가능성을 알아보고자 하였다.

Abstract

King Gesar is a popular text with ongoing research in worldwide. Especially since King Gesar has been translated several times in many languages already. In this study, I reviewed some issues of translation of the English version. Through research, I studied the topics of translating epics and the difference between various cultural perspectives. First of all, there is an ambiguity of King Gesar's category, that is whether King Gesar should be labeled as Chinese Studies or Sinology. Chinese scholar Wang Zhi-guo(王治國) said it should be put in the category of Chinese Studies. Basically the story of King Gesar was disseminated from the Tibetan to the Mongols, and was developed from a basic story to an epic. Eventually King Gesar's story spread in India, Bhutan, Nepal, Sikkim, and Russia. The first western language translation was from Russia. The French and the English translations by David Nell followed the next generation of the translation. But after World War II there were changes in the landscape of Chinese Studies. Now the field of Chinese Studies has grown to include many countries. The United States has the most predominant status. In this study, I attempted to compare the aspect of the two existing English translations. Douglas J. Penick's version was based on that of Tibetan, while Ida Zeitlin's version was translated from Mongolian in 1716. In addition, I examined the contents of these books. In the case of Tibet and Mongolia in the year 1716, when comparing the two different translations with the emphasis on the content in the designated chapter and names of characters, there are three differences. First, the difference in the number and characters of the enemies for Gesar; second, the behaviors of Gesar's uncle as a traitor; lastly, the description of brotherhood. However the ‘fight' to regain his wife and his territories showed no significant difference. Research of the epic on the Silk Road including King Gesar, will give us foresight of how we will enrich our historical perspective. It will be Silk Road Studies. Looking back at the results of these epic studies, we will be able to look forward to see the effects of future relationships with the countries of the Silk Road.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. 나선희, "라마야나, 게사르전, 서유기 ― 실크로드 위 서사작품의 비교", 중국문학, 72, pp.133~153 (2012), 한국중국어문학회[DOI]
  2. 나선희, "중국변경 서사시 게사르왕전의 토대 - 판본과 불교", 중국문학, 78, pp.107~130 (2014), 한국중국어문학회[DOI]
  3. 이부영, "한국의 샤머니즘과 분석심리학-고통과 치유의 상징을 찾아서" (2012), 한길사
  4. 정수일, "실크로드학" (2001), 창비
  5. 바버라 포스터, "백일 년 동안의 여행" (2004), 향연
  6. 알렉산드라 다비드 넬, "영혼의 도시 라싸로 가는길" (2008), 르네상스
  7. 알렉산드라 다비드 넬, "티베트 마법의 서" (2004), 르네상스
  8. 유원수, "몽골 대서사시 게세르 칸" (2007), 사계절출판사
  9. 金石, "深度的擠壓與廣度的繁榮-論《格薩爾》的傳播形態", 西藏大學學報, 28(3) (2013)
  10. 石泰安, "西藏史詩和說唱藝人" (2005), 中國藏學出版社
  11. 王宏印, "集體記憶的千年傳唱: 藏蒙史詩《格薩爾》的飜譯與傳播硏究", 中國飜譯, (2) (2011)
  12. 王治國, "《格薩爾》“本事”與異文本傳承", 西藏大學學報, 28(1) (2013)
  13. 王治國, "海外漢學詩域下的《格薩爾》史詩飜譯", 山東外語敎學, (3)통권 : 148 (2012)
  14. 扎西東珠, "《格薩爾》硏究現實意義及其文學飜譯硏究問題芻議", 蘭州學刊 (2008)
  15. 許光華, "法國漢學史" (2009), 學苑出版社
  16. Alexandra David-Nell, "The Superhuman Life of Gesar of Ling" (1987), Sha mbhala
  17. Barbara Foster, "The Secret lives of Alexandra David-Neel" (1998), Overlook Press
  18. Douglas J. Penick, "The warrior song of King Gesar" (1996), Wisdom Publication
  19. Ida Zeitlin, "Gessar Khan: A Legend of Tibet" (2004), Pilgrims Book House
  20. Robin Kornman, "The Epic of Gesar of Ling: Gesar's Magical Birth, Early Years, and Coronation as King" (2013), Sham bhala
  21. Rolf Alfred Stein, "Recherches sur l'épopée et le barde au Tibet" (1959), Presses unive rsitaires de France

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)