杜甫 일대기의 재구성, 杜甫年譜 제작의 역사와 그 의미
Reconstruction of Dufu’s biography: The study of history and it’s meaning in the Dufu’s chronology
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본고는 宋代 이후 본격적으로 제작된 연보 가운데 杜甫年譜를 연구 대상으로 삼아 역대 편찬 상황을 일람하고, 주요 연보 가운데 나타나는 杜甫 일대기의 구성 방식과 연보의 문학적 의미를 규명하는데 목적을 두었다. 본 연구에서는 두보연보의 구성 방식을 크게 세 가지로 나누어 살펴보았다. 杜詩가 지니고 있는 자전적 성격에 근거하여 그가 남긴 작품을 활용하는 것, 史書 기록에 한 수정과 보완 그리고 두보와 교유한 문인에 대한 고증 과정이 바로 그것인데, 이러한 과정을 통해 확정된 두보 일기 가운데에는 여전히 많은 이설들이 존재하는 것이 사실이다. 이는 곧 연보를 제작하는 후대 문인들의 두보에 한 해석과 인식이 반영된 것이라고 할 수 있는 바, 본고는 지금까지 보조적 문헌으로만 인식되던 연보에 대한 인식을 재정립하고, 이것이 지니는 문학적, 문화적 가치를 규명하고자 하였다.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate the formal and content characteristics of various Du-fu chronology as well as the literary meaning of the Du-fu yearbooks, which were produced from the Song dynasty to the Qing dynasty. Among the Du-fu annals that have been reported so far, there are various types of anniversaries, such as the chronology of the time when the duo lived and the chronology of the tabular annual report that clearly shows the biographies through the table, It can be seen that there are various types of annuals such as the one - year annual report on the works left by Du-fu. In particular, in the process, the annals of both sides of the the qing dynasty have been recognized as separate works of their own, but this study has confirmed that they quoted the annals of the main school ages as they are. In addition, I have examined the methods of tracking the biographies of their bios based on existing biographies by comparing and analyzing biographical biographical information described in each annals. In particular, he wrote his works in the form of a diary. In the making of the annals, the composition of the biographies through these two works, the construction of a chronology by revising and reviewing the records described in the history books, And it is confirmed that the annuals are produced through the reconstruction process of the biweekly biography through the confirmation with the characters like Li-bai, Gu-shi, Yan-mu. As I have already pointed out in various research results, the production of the annals is a methodical attempt to implement the ‘acquaintance theory’ and the ‘reverse order’. However, the production of the annals was not merely to identify the activities of the duo, but was an analytical attempt to grasp the overall flow and contents of the work. In other words, the production of such an annals can be said to have a value in that it is a way of exchanging writers and emotions through the reader’s experience not the situation at the time, and the discovery of the remains, The production of annals was an interpretive attempt to read individual works in a context. Until now, the annals were merely ancillary means of decorating the front of the literary works, but in fact, the annual memorandum contains an in-depth understanding of the literary man, his own interpretation, and consideration of the times when the writer lived. It is worthy of all that the wide knowledge is shared.
참고문헌 (33)
- 金乾坤, "고려시대 문인연보 연구-益齋先生年譜의 분석", 장서각, 5 (2001), 한국학중앙연구원
- 김경동, "白居易 三種年譜 異說比較考江州司馬 이전 시기를 중심으로", 중국문학연구, (31), pp.57~84 (2005), 한국중문학회
- - 忠州刺史 이후 시기를 중심으로, "중어중문학", 2006, 267~302, pp.한국중어중문학회
- 유새롬, "17세기 서인의 학통의식과 율곡연보 편찬", 한국사론, 52 (2006), 서울대학교
- 이정호, "고려후기 文人 年譜와 『高麗史』 列傳 기사의 비교 검토", 韓國史學報, (48), pp.45~69 (2012), 고려사학회
- 이종묵, "한국 문인 年譜 연구-16세기 이전의 年譜를 중심으로", 장서각, 5 (2001), 한국학중앙연구원
- 임도현, "조선의 杜甫 시 학습서의 특징", 한국문화, (72), pp.193~220 (2015), 규장각한국학연구원
- 정석태, "자료의 집성과 정리작업의 필요성 ―퇴계 이황의 집성연보 편성과 정본 편찬 작업의 경우를 중심으로―", 동양한문학연구, 35(35), pp.251~277 (2012), 동양한문학회
- 조영임, "宋時烈의 『紀譜通編』 편찬과 그 의의", 역사와 담론, (53), pp.133~155 (2009), 호서사학회
- 郭英德, "中國古典文學硏究史" (2000), 中華書局
- 仇兆鰲, "杜詩詳注" (1999), 中華書局
- 莫礪鋒, "唐宋詩歌論集" (2007), 鳳凰出版社
- 聞一多, "聞一多全集 唐詩編上" (1993), 湖北人民出版社
- 北京圖書館出版社影印室, "隋唐五代名人年譜" (2005), 北京圖書館出版社
- 謝思煒, "唐宋詩學論集" (2004), 商務印書館
- 謝巍, "年譜的纂例(上)", 文獻, (2) (1986), 中华人民共和国文化部
- 謝巍, "年譜的纂例(下)", 文獻, (3) (1986), 中华人民共和国文化部
- 謝巍, "貴州文史叢刊" (1980), 贵州人民出版社
- 徐昕, "梁權道杜工部年譜硏究", 淮南師範學院學報, 4 (2013), 淮南师范学院学报编辑部
- 聶巧平, "宋代杜詩的輯佚", 廣西師院學報, 22(2) (2001), 廣西師範學院
- 聶巧平, "魯訔的杜甫年譜與編注杜甫詩", 廣東海洋大學學報, 33(2) (2013), 广东海洋大学
- 楊經華, "宋代杜詩闡釋學硏究" (2011), 中國社會科學出版社
- 梁啓超, "中國近三百年學術史" (2009), 岳麓書社
- 楊倫, "杜詩鏡銓" (2007), 中華書局
- 吳洪澤, "宋代年譜考論", 博士, pp.2006
- 李如冰, "呂大防的杜詩硏究及其影響", 杜甫硏究學刊, (3) (2013), 四川省杜甫研究会
- 張忠綱, "杜集敍錄" (2008), 齊魯書社
- 錢謙益, "錢注杜詩" (2009), 上海古籍出版社
- 周采泉, "杜集書錄" (2008), 上海古籍出版社
- 曾祥波, "現存五種宋人 “杜甫年譜”平議", 文學遺産, (4) (2016), 中国社会科学院文学研究所
- 陳光貽, "年譜起源與發展", 學術月刊 (1984), 上海市社会科学界联合会
- 浦起龍, "讀杜心解" (2010), 中華書局
- 華文軒, "古典文學硏究資料彙編, 杜甫卷" (2001), 中華書局
