도농복합지역 여성의 암검진 수검 및 유소견자 검진 실태
Factors Associated with Cancer Screening and Follow-up Examination after Abnormal Results among Women in Gyeongju City
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: The specific objectives of this study was to identify the longitudinal change of the screening rates according to type of cancer, whether follow up examination had been conducted to those subjects had abnormal findings after cancer screening, and association between the cancer screening experiences and general characteristics and health behaviors of the subjects. Methods: For this study, 353 female respondents in four Dongs (urban areas) and five Ub/Myeons (rural areas) of Gyeongju city, Gyeongsangbuk-do province were selected using stratified random cluster sampling and administered questionnaire. This study was conducted from December 2005 to February 2006. The sample for this study is composed of 332 females, and interviews with 299 females was completed. Subjects were asked about their general characteristics, health behaviors, experiences of cancer screening, results of cancer screening, whether participated the follow up examination after abnormal findings on the cancer screening, and the reasons to participate in cancer screening for both those participated and those not participated cancer screening on the survey. Study subjects in stomach cancer screening were asked about their experiences of gastroscopy and upper GI examination. Participants in the breast, and colorectal cancer screening were asked about their experiences of mammogram, colonoscopy and double contrast barium enema examination, respectively. For the assessment, we used the recommended guidelines of cancer screening in order to judge how the subjects observed the standard. Recommended guidelines, which we used, of cancer screening for the stomach and breast is doing examination every two years, for the FOBT is every year, for the colonoscopy and double contrast barium enema examination is every five years. The analysis was conducted using SPSS version 12.0. And chi -square test, and Fisher's exact test were used for statistical test. Results: Utilizing recommended guidelines, the participation rates for the stomach, breast, and colorectal cancer screening were 29.4%, 24.4%, 17.5%, respectively and for the fecal occult blood test (FOBT) was 9.2%. And followings are the cancer screening rates in the past five years. Screening rate for stomach cancer is 38.8%, for breast cancer 30.8%, for colorectal cancer 17.5% and for FOBT is 9.2%. The most prominent motive for those participated the cancer screening was "Had a chance for cancer screening", which consists the reason for stomach cancer screening 80.4%, for breast cancer: 88.7%, for colonoscopy: 87.5%, for FOBT was 93.0%. Subjects who responded never had experienced cancer screening had the reasons of "Not having any health problem" the most frequently. Age is the only statistically significant factor association with cancer screening rates. Other general characteristics and health behavior were not associated with cancer screening rates. Conclusions: This study suggests the need for education and public campaigns, particularly targeting on forties and seventies, of age to raise the cancer screening rates and follow up examination rates after abnormal screening results.
Abstract
Objectives: The specific objectives of this study was to identify the longitudinal change of the screening rates according to type of cancer, whether follow up examination had been conducted to those subjects had abnormal findings after cancer screening, and association between the cancer screening experiences and general characteristics and health behaviors of the subjects. Methods: For this study, 353 female respondents in four Dongs (urban areas) and five Ub/Myeons (rural areas) of Gyeongju city, Gyeongsangbuk-do province were selected using stratified random cluster sampling and administered questionnaire. This study was conducted from December 2005 to February 2006. The sample for this study is composed of 332 females, and interviews with 299 females was completed. Subjects were asked about their general characteristics, health behaviors, experiences of cancer screening, results of cancer screening, whether participated the follow up examination after abnormal findings on the cancer screening, and the reasons to participate in cancer screening for both those participated and those not participated cancer screening on the survey. Study subjects in stomach cancer screening were asked about their experiences of gastroscopy and upper GI examination. Participants in the breast, and colorectal cancer screening were asked about their experiences of mammogram, colonoscopy and double contrast barium enema examination, respectively. For the assessment, we used the recommended guidelines of cancer screening in order to judge how the subjects observed the standard. Recommended guidelines, which we used, of cancer screening for the stomach and breast is doing examination every two years, for the FOBT is every year, for the colonoscopy and double contrast barium enema examination is every five years. The analysis was conducted using SPSS version 12.0. And chi -square test, and Fisher's exact test were used for statistical test. Results: Utilizing recommended guidelines, the participation rates for the stomach, breast, and colorectal cancer screening were 29.4%, 24.4%, 17.5%, respectively and for the fecal occult blood test (FOBT) was 9.2%. And followings are the cancer screening rates in the past five years. Screening rate for stomach cancer is 38.8%, for breast cancer 30.8%, for colorectal cancer 17.5% and for FOBT is 9.2%. The most prominent motive for those participated the cancer screening was "Had a chance for cancer screening", which consists the reason for stomach cancer screening 80.4%, for breast cancer: 88.7%, for colonoscopy: 87.5%, for FOBT was 93.0%. Subjects who responded never had experienced cancer screening had the reasons of "Not having any health problem" the most frequently. Age is the only statistically significant factor association with cancer screening rates. Other general characteristics and health behavior were not associated with cancer screening rates. Conclusions: This study suggests the need for education and public campaigns, particularly targeting on forties and seventies, of age to raise the cancer screening rates and follow up examination rates after abnormal screening results.
참고문헌 (18)
- 경주시 통계연보, "2006년도 경주시 통계연보", pp.59~ (2007), 경주시
- 김영복, "성인 여성의 자궁경부암 및 유방암 조기검진 수검행위에 영향을 미치는 요인", 보건교육․건강증진학회지, 17(1), pp.155~170 (2000)
- 김영복, "지역사회 여성주민의 건강보험제도를 활용한 건강검진 및 암검진 수검 특성", 보건교육․건강증진학회지, 20(1), pp.41~60 (2003)
- 노운영, "지역사회 주민의 암 조기검진 수검행위에 영향을 미치는 결정인자", 한국역학회지, 21(1), pp.81~92 (1999)
- 박정돈, "농촌지역 여성의 유방암 및 자궁경부암의 검진행위에 영향을 미치는 요인", 한국모자보건학회지, 8(1), pp.49~64 (2004), 한국모자보건학회
- 보건복지부, "우리나라 국민 2명 중 1명, 암검진 받아" (2007), 보건복지부 보고자료
- 성나영, "국가 암조기검진 사업 참여에 영향을 미치는 인구사회학적 요인", 예방의학회지, 38(1), pp.93~100 (2005), 대한예방의학회
- 안윤옥, "암 등록사업의 현황과 추진방향", 예방의학회지, 40(4), pp.265~272 (2007), 대한예방의학회
- 이건세, "농촌지역주임의 암 조기검진과 관련요인에 관한 연구", 예방의학회지, 33(3), pp.364~372 (1999)
- 이무식, "암 조기검진 활성화를 위한 홍보자료 개발 및 평가사례연구", 대한보건협회학술지, 30(1), pp.71~78 (2004)
- 이혜진, "단계적 행위변화 모형을 이용한 자궁경부암 검진행위 관련요인 분석 -국가 조기 암검진 대상자들을 중심으로-", 예방의학회지, 38(1), pp.82~92 (2005), 대한예방의학회
- 임진화, "민간의료보험이 암 환자의 의료이용과 의료비에 미치는 영향: 일개 암전문의료기관의 우리나라 주요 암종을 중심으로", 예방의학회지, 40(4), pp.329~335 (2007), 대한예방의학회
- 정성화, "유방암 조기진단을 위한 검진주기 결정에 대한 연구", 예방의학회지, 39(4), pp.346~352 (2006), 대한예방의학회
- 최귀선, "국가 암조기검진사업 성과에 영향을 미치는 요인-보건소 및 사업실무자 특성을 중심으로-", 예방의학회지, 37(3), pp.246~252 (2004), 대한예방의학회
- 함명일, "향후 2년 이내의 위암 검진 이용 의도의 예측 요인", 예방의학회지, 40(3), pp.205~212 (2007), 대한예방의학회
- Bener A, "The determinants of breast cancer screening behavior: a focus group study of women in the United Arab Emirates", Oncol Nurs Forum, 29(9), pp.E91~E98 (2002)
- Humphrey LL, "Breast cancer screening: A summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force", Ann Intern Med, 137(5 Part 1), pp.347~360 (2002)
- Zapka GJ, "Patient education for colon cancer screening: A randomized trial of video mailed before a physical examination", Annals of Internal Medicine, 141(9), pp.683~692 (2004)
