본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

태양광 설비투자에 대한 제도적 유인방안 연구: 감가상각법의 경제적 효과 분석

The Effects of Depreciation Methods on Investment Motivation for Solar Photovoltaic Systems

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The value of tangible assets depreciates over their useful life and this depreciation should be adequately reflected in any tax or financial reports. However, the method used to calculate depreciation can impact the financial performance of solar projects due to the time value of money. Korean tax law stipulates only one method for calculating the depreciation of solar photovoltaic facilities: the straight-line method. Conversely, USA’s tax law accepts other depreciation methods as solar incentives, including the modified accelerated cost recovery system (MACRS) and Bonus depreciation method. This paper compares different depreciation methods in the financial analysis of a 10 MW solar system to determine their effect on the financial results. When depreciation was calculated utilizing the MACRS and Bonus depreciation method, the internal rate of return (IRR) was 10.9% and 16.4% higher, respectively, than when the Korean straight-line depreciation method was used. Additionally, the increased IRR resulting from the use of the two US methods resulted in a 20.5% and 27.4% higher net present value, respectively. This shows that changing the depreciation calculation method can redistribute the tax amount during the project period, thereby increasing the discounted cash flow of the solar project. In addition to increasing profitability, USA’s depreciation methods alleviate the uncertainty of solar projects and provide more flexibility in project financing than the Korean method. These results strongly suggest that Korean tax law could greatly benefit from adopting USA’s depreciation methods as an effective incentive scheme.

Abstract

The value of tangible assets depreciates over their useful life and this depreciation should be adequately reflected in any tax or financial reports. However, the method used to calculate depreciation can impact the financial performance of solar projects due to the time value of money. Korean tax law stipulates only one method for calculating the depreciation of solar photovoltaic facilities: the straight-line method. Conversely, USA’s tax law accepts other depreciation methods as solar incentives, including the modified accelerated cost recovery system (MACRS) and Bonus depreciation method. This paper compares different depreciation methods in the financial analysis of a 10 MW solar system to determine their effect on the financial results. When depreciation was calculated utilizing the MACRS and Bonus depreciation method, the internal rate of return (IRR) was 10.9% and 16.4% higher, respectively, than when the Korean straight-line depreciation method was used. Additionally, the increased IRR resulting from the use of the two US methods resulted in a 20.5% and 27.4% higher net present value, respectively. This shows that changing the depreciation calculation method can redistribute the tax amount during the project period, thereby increasing the discounted cash flow of the solar project. In addition to increasing profitability, USA’s depreciation methods alleviate the uncertainty of solar projects and provide more flexibility in project financing than the Korean method. These results strongly suggest that Korean tax law could greatly benefit from adopting USA’s depreciation methods as an effective incentive scheme.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. 선우석호, "REC가격변동이 태양광투자에 미치는 영향에 대한 실증분석", 신재생에너지, 12(3), pp.156~164 (2016), 한국신·재생에너지학회
  2. "Overseas cases of renewable energy promotion policy: comparison of US and UK with implication, Seoul Economy, 2010(12)" (2010)[URL]
  3. "National Tax Law Information System"[URL]
  4. "How to depreciate property, Publication 946" (2019)[URL]
  5. "Tax cuts and jobs act: a comparison for businesses"[URL]
  6. "Depreciation policy of major countries, Tax Law Research 09-07" (2009)[URL]
  7. "PV industry and development policy in US, World Energy Market Insight, 17-16" (2017)[URL]
  8. Harrison Jr, W. T., "Financial accounting: international financial reporting standards" (2011), Pearson
  9. Dobrovolsky, S. P., "Depreciation policies and investment decisions", Am. Econ. Rev, 41(5), pp.906~914 (1951)
  10. Goode, R., "Accelerated depreciation allowances as a stimulus to investment", Q. J. Econ, 69(2), pp.191~220 (1955)
  11. Klemm, A., "Causes, benefits, and risks of business tax incentives", Int. Tax Public Finance, 17(3), pp.315~336 (2010)
  12. House, C. L., "Temporary investment tax incentive : theory with evidence from bonus depreciation", Am. Econ. Rev, 98(3), pp.737~768 (2008)
  13. "NSRDB(National Solar Radiation Database)"[URL]
  14. "Solar Equipment lists"[URL]
  15. "System advisor model"[URL]
  16. "Annual technology baseline"[URL]
  17. SAM photovoltaic model technical reference update, "Gilman, P.", National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), ~, pp.NREL (2018), TP-6A20-67399
  18. Bhattacharyya, S.C., "Energy Economics" (2011), Springer

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)