고위험 임산부의 조산위험 사정도구 개발 과정: 1단계 예비도구 개발
Development Process for Preterm Birth Risk Assessment Scale in High-Risk Pregnancy: 1st Phase of Preliminary Scale Development
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: To pool preliminary items based on nine domains as the first phase of developing a preterm birth risk assessment scale (PBRAS). Methods: Item generation was performed using deductive methods, such as literature review and related scales, and inductive methods through in-depth interviews with 11 preterm birth (PTB) women, and experts validated the content. The experts were clinical nurses w ho worked in delivery rooms, and professors who taught on the subject of women's health nursing. Preliminary survey for 32-item was conducted among 27 women with PTB. Results: After item generation and pooling for the PBRAS, a total of 84 items were developed. A 32- item questionnaire was integrated with rigorous review by experts. Internal consistency of the 32-item PBRAS had a Cronbach alpha of 0.90. The PBRAS was significantly correlated with pregnancy stress (r= 0.77, p<0.001), somatic awareness scale (r=0.72, p<0.001), and risk scoring for PTB (r=0.44, p<0.001). Conclusion: The 32-item PBRAS has content validity, but exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses for the 2nd phase of scale development needs to be performed.
Abstract
Purpose: To pool preliminary items based on nine domains as the first phase of developing a preterm birth risk assessment scale (PBRAS). Methods: Item generation was performed using deductive methods, such as literature review and related scales, and inductive methods through in-depth interviews with 11 preterm birth (PTB) women, and experts validated the content. The experts were clinical nurses w ho worked in delivery rooms, and professors who taught on the subject of women's health nursing. Preliminary survey for 32-item was conducted among 27 women with PTB. Results: After item generation and pooling for the PBRAS, a total of 84 items were developed. A 32- item questionnaire was integrated with rigorous review by experts. Internal consistency of the 32-item PBRAS had a Cronbach alpha of 0.90. The PBRAS was significantly correlated with pregnancy stress (r= 0.77, p<0.001), somatic awareness scale (r=0.72, p<0.001), and risk scoring for PTB (r=0.44, p<0.001). Conclusion: The 32-item PBRAS has content validity, but exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses for the 2nd phase of scale development needs to be performed.
참고문헌 (26)
- 안태규, "임신 제3삼분기 혈청 페리틴과 조산 및 저체중아와의 연관성", 한국모자보건학회지, 25(1), pp.55~62 (2021), 한국모자보건학회
- "Preterm (premature) labor and birth" (2020)[URL]
- Boateng GO, "Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research : a primer", Front Public Health, 6, pp.149~ (2018)
- 조미옥, "임신부의 조산위험 선별도구 개발", 디지털융복합연구, 18(6), pp.335~344 (2020), 한국디지털정책학회[DOI]
- Creasy RK, "System for predicting spontaneous preterm birth", Obstet Gynecol, 55, pp.692~695 (1980)
- Cunningham F, "Williams obstetrics", pp.803~834 (2018), McGraw-Hill Education
- De Vellis RF, "Scale development: theory and applications" (2017), Sage
- Edenfield SM, "Validity of the creasy risk appraisal Instrument for prediction of preterm labor", Nurs Res, 44, pp.76~81 (1999)
- Fuchs F, "Effect of maternal age on the risk of preterm birth : a large cohort study", PLoS One, 13, pp.e0191002~ (2018)
- Haynes SN, "Content validity in psychological assessment : a functional approach to concepts and methods", Pyschol Assess, 7, pp.238~247 (1995)
- Honest H, "The accuracy of risk scores in predicting preterm birth-a systematic review", J Obstet Gynaecol, 24, pp.343~359 (2004)
- Iams JD, "Care for women with prior preterm birth", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 203, pp.89~100 (2010)
- 김증임, "텍스트 네트워크 분석을 이용한 조산 경험 이야기의 시각화", 여성건강간호학회지, 26(3), pp.205~212 (2020), 한국여성건강간호학회[DOI]
- 김증임, "임신 2삼분기 여성의 조기진통 증상과 조산에 영향을 미치는 다인성 요인", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 47(3), pp.357~366 (2017), 한국간호과학회
- 김윤경, "조기진통 임부의 조산 발생 영향요인: 전향적 코호트 연구", 여성건강간호학회지, 24(3), pp.233~242 (2018), 한국여성건강간호학회[DOI]
- Kim YR, "Development of the Korean Pregnancy Stress Scale", Japan J Nurs Sci, 15, pp.113~124 (2018)
- "Development and psychometric evaluation of the Somatic Awareness Scale of women with spontaneous preterm labor (SPL-SAS)" (2014)[URL]
- "Population trend; birth statistics 2020" (2021)[URL]
- 권은진, "고령 임산부에서 조산에 영향을 미치는 위험 요인", 한국모자보건학회지, 22(2), pp.106~111 (2018), 한국모자보건학회[DOI]
- Lawn JE, "Preterm birth : now the leading cause of child death worldwide", Sci Trans Med, 6, pp.263ed21~ (2014)
- Lynn M, "Determination and quantification of content validity", Nurs Res, 35, pp.382~385 (1986)
- Ogawa K, "Association between very advanced maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcomes : a cross sectional Japanese study", BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 17, pp.349~ (2017)
- Petrini JR, "Estimated effect of 17 alpha hydroxy-progesterone caproate on preterm birth in the United States", Obstet Gynecol, 105, pp.267~272 (2005)
- Polit DF, "Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations", Res Nurs Health, 30, pp.459~467 (2007)
- Sharma D, "Late preterm : a new high risk group in neonatology", J Matern-Fetal Neonatal Med, 34, pp.2717~2730 (2021)
- Zhu YZ, "New model for predicting preterm delivery during the second trimester of pregnancy", Sci Rep, 7, pp.11294~ (2017)