임신 위험 증상 지각 측정도구 개발
Development of Pregnancy Risk Symptom Perception Scale
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: To develop Pregnancy Risk symptom Perception Scale (PRPS) and evaluate its validity and reliability. Methods: A preliminary 30-item version of PRPS was developed through literature review, in-depth interview, and Content Validity. Each item was scored on a four-point Likert scale. The preliminary scale was developed based on 301 pregnant women who visited a hospital. Date were analyzed using item analysis, factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, Pearson’s correlation coefficients, and Cronbach's ⍺ (0.90 for total item, 0.80 to 0.88 for factors). Results: The PRPS consisted of 27 items. Three factors (physical, environmental, and emotional factors) explained 55% of the total variance. Cronbach's Criterion validity was supported by comparison with the Perception of Pregnancy Risk Questionnaire (r=0.34). In reliability test, the reliability coefficient of pregnancy risk symptom perception was high at 0.90. Conclusion: These results suggest that the pregnancy risk symptom perception scale developed in this study comprises items that can assess the level of pregnant women’s pregnancy risk symptom perception in Korea. Its validity and reliability were proven. PRPS can be utilized to measure pregnant women’s risk symptom perception during pregnancy. PRPS will contribute to the development of systematic prenatal care and effective risk management.
Abstract
Purpose: To develop Pregnancy Risk symptom Perception Scale (PRPS) and evaluate its validity and reliability. Methods: A preliminary 30-item version of PRPS was developed through literature review, in-depth interview, and Content Validity. Each item was scored on a four-point Likert scale. The preliminary scale was developed based on 301 pregnant women who visited a hospital. Date were analyzed using item analysis, factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, Pearson’s correlation coefficients, and Cronbach's ⍺ (0.90 for total item, 0.80 to 0.88 for factors). Results: The PRPS consisted of 27 items. Three factors (physical, environmental, and emotional factors) explained 55% of the total variance. Cronbach's Criterion validity was supported by comparison with the Perception of Pregnancy Risk Questionnaire (r=0.34). In reliability test, the reliability coefficient of pregnancy risk symptom perception was high at 0.90. Conclusion: These results suggest that the pregnancy risk symptom perception scale developed in this study comprises items that can assess the level of pregnant women’s pregnancy risk symptom perception in Korea. Its validity and reliability were proven. PRPS can be utilized to measure pregnant women’s risk symptom perception during pregnancy. PRPS will contribute to the development of systematic prenatal care and effective risk management.
참고문헌 (28)
- 황라일, "35세 이상 고령 임산부 진료실적 추이에 관한 연구", 보건행정학회지, 21(4), pp.585~598 (2011), 한국보건행정학회
- 최재호, "고령 산모의 임신 및 출산의 임상적 특성에 관한 메타분석", Obstetrics & Gynecology Science, 49(2), pp.293~308 (2006), 대한산부인과학회
- 김태헌, "인구 및 사회경제적 차별출산력 - 인구센서스 자료분석을 중심으로", 한국인구학, 29(1), pp.1~23 (2006), 한국인구학회
- [URL]
- 이주영, "고위험 임부 배우자의 스트레스와 대처양상", 여성건강간호학회지, 16(3), pp.234~244 (2010), 한국여성건강간호학회
- 김상미, "부모의 사회경제적 지위가 출산결과 및 영아사망에 미치는 영향: 2000년대 초반과 후반을 중심으로", 한국인구학, 35(1), pp.131~149 (2012), 한국인구학회[DOI]
- Salem YS, "A significant linear association exists between advanced maternal age and adverse perinatal outcome", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 283(4), pp.755~759 (2011)[DOI]
- 김태은, "건강한 고령 초산모에서 산모 연령이 임신결과에 미치는 영향", Perinatology, 20(2), pp.146~152 (2009), 대한주산의학회
- Carolan MC, "Towards understanding the concept of risk for pregnant women: Some nursing and midwifery implications", Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18(5), pp.652~658 (2009)[DOI]
- Richter MS, "Listening to the voices of hospitalized high-risk antepartum patient", Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 36(4), pp.313~318 (2007)[DOI]
- Bayrampour H, "Comparison of perception of pregnancy risk of nulliparous women of advanced maternal age and younger age", Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health, 57(5), pp.445~453 (2012)[DOI]
- Heaman M, "Factors influencing pregnant women's perceptions of risk", The American Journal of Maternal Child Nursing, 29(2), pp.111~116 (2004)[DOI]
- Lee S, "Risk perception of women during high risk pregnancy: A systematic review", Health, Risk & Society, 14(6), pp.511~531 (2012)[DOI]
- 김미혜, "35세 미만과 35세 이상 임산부의 임신스트레스, 불안 및 출산결과 비교연구", Journal of The Korean Data Analysis Society, 16(4), pp.2177~2190 (2014), 한국자료분석학회
- Heaman MI, "Psychometric testing of the perception of pregnancy risk questionnaire", Research in Nursing & Health, 32(5), pp.493~503 (2009)[DOI]
- [URL]
- 이윤주, "간호사가 경험하는 직장 내 괴롭힘 결과 측정도구 개발", 한국산학기술학회논문지, 17(2), pp.479~488 (2016), 한국산학기술학회[DOI]
- Lynn MR, "Determination and quantification of content validity", Nursing Research, 35(6), pp.382~385 (1986)
- Tabachnick BG, "Using multivariate statistics", pp.966~ (2000), Allyn and bacon
- Seo UH, "Statistical analysis using SPSS 18.0", pp.434~ (2010), freedom academy
- Streiner DL, "Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use", pp.25~39 (2009), Oxford university press
- 허선, "감염관리간호사의 직무스트레스 측정도구 개발 및 평가", 간호행정학회지, 19(5), pp.622~635 (2013), 간호행정학회[DOI]
- 최혜지, "사회복지사의 문화적 역량 척도 개발 연구", 한국사회복지행정학, 16(2), pp.55~91 (2014), 한국사회복지행정학회[DOI]
- Choi JS, "Pregnancy risk assessment mornitoring system", Health and Welfare Policy, 19, pp.61~69 (2012)
- Bae BY, "Structural equation modeling with amos 19-principles and practices", pp.229~239 (2011), Chungram
- 조용해, "한국판 Beck Depression Inventory의 확인적 요인분석: 대학생과 임상표본 간 구조 및 측정동일성 검증", Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 21(4), pp.843~857 (2002), 한국임상심리학회
- Sun TJ, "Rearch methodology", pp.163~211 (2007), Hakjisa
- 이경희, "한국의 도구개발 간호연구에서의 타당도에 대한 고찰", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 43(6), pp.697~703 (2013), 한국간호과학회