본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

사진의 세 가지 경로와 알레고리 -포스트모더니즘 시대의 관점으로-

Three Courses and Allegory of Photography -From The Postmodernism Era-

1

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타예술체육

초록

In this article I depicted how photographs were absorbed in the contemporary visual art movement through three courses and allegory and how they were explained in the theoretical perspective,and I explored how photographs were explained in the relation with theories of humanities and art works. Lastly with regard to photographs I compared mordernist formalism with postmodern critics. The focus of this analysis was to move our perspective from seeing photographs as images to examining them in the theoretical frames. The purpose of this article was that the discourse of photographs should be understood in terms of art movement, esthetic, art critic, linguistic and art historic. In addition, all the artistic works should be considered as neutral representation. The issue is whether we can define the identity of photographs in one track mind. First of all, to impute an allegorical motive to contemporary art is to venture into proscribed territory,for allegory has been condemned for nearly two centuries as aesthetic aberration, the antithesis of art. I want to focus on this reemergence through its impact on both the practice and the criticism of the visual arts. Duchamp is an important precedent to be accounted for contemporary art. He identified both the ‘instantaneous state of rest’ and the ‘extra-rapid exposure’ that is, the photographic aspects, of 「The Large Glass, 1915-1923」 as ‘allegorical appearance’. Allegorical imagery is appropriated imagery. The allegorist does not invent images but confiscates them. He lays claim to the culturally significant, acts as its interpreter. And the image becomes something other. He does not restore an original meaning that may have been lost or obscured. Allegory is not hermeneutics. The first link between allegory and contemporary art may now be made: with the appropriation of images that occurs in the works of Cindy Sherman, Sherrie Levine and others. The artists who generate images through the appropriation of images. Sherman’s works are all self-portraits,but in them the artist invariably appears masked and disguised. She first costumes herself to resemble familiar female stereotypes-career girl, ingenue, sex object.-and then photographs herself in poses and settings reminiscent of the cinematic culture of the 1950s and 1960s. The photo works by Sherrie Levine after Alexander Rodchenko, Walker Evans, Edward Weston and other masters of early modern photography are among the most radical works in this context. Her re-photographed images raised questions about originality and even copyright infringement.

Abstract

In this article I depicted how photographs were absorbed in the contemporary visual art movement through three courses and allegory and how they were explained in the theoretical perspective,and I explored how photographs were explained in the relation with theories of humanities and art works. Lastly with regard to photographs I compared mordernist formalism with postmodern critics. The focus of this analysis was to move our perspective from seeing photographs as images to examining them in the theoretical frames. The purpose of this article was that the discourse of photographs should be understood in terms of art movement, esthetic, art critic, linguistic and art historic. In addition, all the artistic works should be considered as neutral representation. The issue is whether we can define the identity of photographs in one track mind. First of all, to impute an allegorical motive to contemporary art is to venture into proscribed territory,for allegory has been condemned for nearly two centuries as aesthetic aberration, the antithesis of art. I want to focus on this reemergence through its impact on both the practice and the criticism of the visual arts. Duchamp is an important precedent to be accounted for contemporary art. He identified both the ‘instantaneous state of rest’ and the ‘extra-rapid exposure’ that is, the photographic aspects, of 「The Large Glass, 1915-1923」 as ‘allegorical appearance’. Allegorical imagery is appropriated imagery. The allegorist does not invent images but confiscates them. He lays claim to the culturally significant, acts as its interpreter. And the image becomes something other. He does not restore an original meaning that may have been lost or obscured. Allegory is not hermeneutics. The first link between allegory and contemporary art may now be made: with the appropriation of images that occurs in the works of Cindy Sherman, Sherrie Levine and others. The artists who generate images through the appropriation of images. Sherman’s works are all self-portraits,but in them the artist invariably appears masked and disguised. She first costumes herself to resemble familiar female stereotypes-career girl, ingenue, sex object.-and then photographs herself in poses and settings reminiscent of the cinematic culture of the 1950s and 1960s. The photo works by Sherrie Levine after Alexander Rodchenko, Walker Evans, Edward Weston and other masters of early modern photography are among the most radical works in this context. Her re-photographed images raised questions about originality and even copyright infringement.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. 김인식, "이미지와 글쓰기", pp.67~ (1993), 세계사
  2. 두행숙, "헤겔의 미학강의.", pp.202~207 (2010), 은행나무
  3. 윤난지, "미술의 화두", pp.163~173 (2000), 눈빛
  4. Batchen, G., "사진의 고고학", pp.28~43 (2006), 이매진
  5. Flusser, V., "사진의 철학을 위하여", pp.12~14 (1999), 커뮤니케이션북스
  6. Foster, H., "반미학", pp.153~156 (1993), 현대미학사
  7. Foster, H., "1900년 이후의 미술사", pp.36~38 (2007), 세미콜론
  8. 김보라, "개념미술", pp.38~ (2008), 마로니에북스
  9. Rouillẻ, A., "세계사 진사" (1993), 까치
  10. Storey, J., "대중문화 와 문화연구", pp.82~ (2002), 경문사
  11. Arendt, H., "Illumination", pp.233~234 (1968), Schocken Books
  12. Berger, J., "Ways of Seeing", pp.134~ (1972), Penguin Books
  13. Eco, U., "Lowbrow Highbrow, Highbrow Lowbrow" (1988), Times Newspapers Ltd.
  14. Freidus, M., "Typologies: 9 Contemporary Photographers" (1991), Newport Harbor Art Museum
  15. Foster, H., "The return of the real", pp.136~138 (1996), The MIT Press
  16. Foster, H., "Art since 1900: Modernism, Antimodernism, Postmodernism" (2004), Thames & Hudson
  17. Lees, A. L., "The new art history. Atlantic Highlands", pp.5~ (1988), Humanities Press International, Inc.
  18. Trachtenberg, A., "Classic essays on photography", pp.215~ (1980), Leete’s Island Books
  19. Wallis, B., "Art after modernism: rethinking representation", pp.233~235 (1984), The New Museum of Contemporary Art

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)