A Study on FSA Application for Human Errors of Dynamic Positioning Vessels Incidents
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) has been mostly implemented on the hardware aspects of vessels. Although there are guidelines regarding human error FSAs, there have not been many assessments in such areas. To this end, this study seeks to use precedent studies for the safe operation of DP vessels, conducting an FSA regarding human error of DP LOP (Loss of Position) incidents. For this, the study referred to precedent studies for the frequency of DP LOP incidents caused by human errors, adding the severity of LOP incidents, and then applying them to the Bayesian network. As a result, the study was able to confirm that among DP LOP incidents caused by human errors, the drive-off from skill-based errors was 74.3% and the drive-off from unsafe supervision was 50.5%. Based on such results, RCOs (Risk Control Options) were devised through a brainstorming session with experts coming up with proposals including providing mandatory DPO training, installing DP simulator on the vessels, drawing up measures to understanding the procedures for safe operation of DP vessels. Moreover, it was found that mandatory DPO training is reasonable in terms of cost benefits and that while installing a DP simulator is not suitable in terms of cost benefits, it can significantly reduce risks when operating DP vessels..
Abstract
Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) has been mostly implemented on the hardware aspects of vessels. Although there are guidelines regarding human error FSAs, there have not been many assessments in such areas. To this end, this study seeks to use precedent studies for the safe operation of DP vessels, conducting an FSA regarding human error of DP LOP (Loss of Position) incidents. For this, the study referred to precedent studies for the frequency of DP LOP incidents caused by human errors, adding the severity of LOP incidents, and then applying them to the Bayesian network. As a result, the study was able to confirm that among DP LOP incidents caused by human errors, the drive-off from skill-based errors was 74.3% and the drive-off from unsafe supervision was 50.5%. Based on such results, RCOs (Risk Control Options) were devised through a brainstorming session with experts coming up with proposals including providing mandatory DPO training, installing DP simulator on the vessels, drawing up measures to understanding the procedures for safe operation of DP vessels. Moreover, it was found that mandatory DPO training is reasonable in terms of cost benefits and that while installing a DP simulator is not suitable in terms of cost benefits, it can significantly reduce risks when operating DP vessels..
참고문헌 (10)
- "Data Analytics, Mathematical Modeling, Decision Support" (2015)[URL]
- 채종주, "DP 선박 위치손실사고의 인적오류에 관한 연구", 해양환경안전학회지, 21(5), pp.515~523 (2015), 해양환경안전학회[DOI]
- Chae, C. J, "An Application of FSA for Safe Operation of Dynamic Positioning Vessels", Navigation System Engineering, KMOU, pp.90~93 (2016)
- Dynamic Positioning Committee, "DP operations guidance, prepared through the Dynamic Positioning Committee of the Marine Technology Society to aid in the safe and effective management of DP operations", 36~43 (2012)
- Griggs, F. J, "A Human Factors Analysis and Classification System(HFACS) Examination of Commercial Vessel Accidents", Naval Postgraduate school, 22~ (2012)
- Hauff, K. S., "Analysis of Loss of Position Incidents for Dynamically Operated Vessels", Department of Marine Technology, NTNU –Trondheim, pp.2014
- International Maritime Organization, "Consolidated text of the Guidelines for Formal Safety Assessment for use in the IMO rule-making process", MSC 83, 2007, pp.49~55
- IMCA, "Risk analysis of collision of Dynamically positioned support vessel with offshore installation", 16~20 (1994)
- Improving Incident Investigation through Inclusion of Human factors, "Rothblum, A.", United States Department of Transportation Publications, 24~28 (2002)
- Shi, P, "Case Study of DP Vessels Performing SIMOPS", DYNAMIC POSITIONING CONFERENCE, pp.2~ (2005)