Economic Analysis of Foldable Containers on the Jeju–Mokpo Container Route
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Shipping containers promote rapid development of the transport industry, and generate economic and social value. However, problems often occur due to imbalance in dynamics between exports and imports, container relocation, traffic congestion, and general shipping network designs. So, efficient and cost-effective cargo management has become crucial for the Jeju Island – Mokpo container route (JMCR) in South Korea. Dozens of recent studies reveal that collapsible or foldable containers, may become an innovative solution to problematic issues within the shipping industry. The major purpose of this study is to discuss conditions required for successful commercial application of foldable containers, based on a cost-benefit analysis precisely for the JMCR. Findings reveal usage of foldable containers can be cost-effective, if containers make a “FULL<->EMPTY” route. To the contrary, a “FULL<->FULL” route can drastically increase expenditure. However, economic analysis of actual figures for 2010-2015 indicate that benefits for Mokpo – Jeju direction are significant to cover losses on the Jeju – Mokpo line. Seasonal patterns and mixing percentages of foldable and standard containers on the route, may also produce cost-effective solutions. Sensitivity analysis reveals that benefits from using foldable containers, depend mostly on empty container shares in addition to various extra costs.
Abstract
Shipping containers promote rapid development of the transport industry, and generate economic and social value. However, problems often occur due to imbalance in dynamics between exports and imports, container relocation, traffic congestion, and general shipping network designs. So, efficient and cost-effective cargo management has become crucial for the Jeju Island – Mokpo container route (JMCR) in South Korea. Dozens of recent studies reveal that collapsible or foldable containers, may become an innovative solution to problematic issues within the shipping industry. The major purpose of this study is to discuss conditions required for successful commercial application of foldable containers, based on a cost-benefit analysis precisely for the JMCR. Findings reveal usage of foldable containers can be cost-effective, if containers make a “FULL<->EMPTY” route. To the contrary, a “FULL<->FULL” route can drastically increase expenditure. However, economic analysis of actual figures for 2010-2015 indicate that benefits for Mokpo – Jeju direction are significant to cover losses on the Jeju – Mokpo line. Seasonal patterns and mixing percentages of foldable and standard containers on the route, may also produce cost-effective solutions. Sensitivity analysis reveals that benefits from using foldable containers, depend mostly on empty container shares in addition to various extra costs.
참고문헌 (11)
- Yapa Mahinda BANDARA, "Improving Logistics Management Using Foldable", Collapsible Containers: A Case Study, 2015, pp.31(1), 161~186[DOI]
- "Development of folding container will save 300 billion KRW per year" (2017)[URL]
- 한진석, "화물자동차 공차통행 발생요인 분석", 대한교통학회지, 30(6), pp.47~57 (2012), 대한교통학회[DOI]
- "How does a 4FOLD foldable container generate savings?" (2018)[URL]
- Konings, R., "Foldable Containers to Reduce the Costs of Empty Transport? A Cost–Benefit Analysis from a Chain and Multi-Actor Perspective", Maritime Economics & Logistics, 7(3), pp.223~249 (2005)
- "MOLIT" (2017)[URL]
- Moon, I., "Foldable and Standard Containers in Empty Container Repositioning", Transportation Research Part E, 49, pp.107~124 (2013)
- Park, J. W, "Empty Container Distribution and Reassignment Problem due to Demand of Freight Depot", Annual Conference of Journal of Korea Navigation and Port Research, 2009(Autumn), pp.185~186 (2009)
- Rodrigue, J. P, "The Geography of Transport Systems" (2017), Routledge
- 신철환, "경인지역 내 효율적인 공 컨테이너 반납처리 방안 연구 - 의왕ICD와 인천항을 중심으로 -", 한국항해항만학회지, 40(6), pp.459~468 (2016), 한국항해항만학회[DOI]
- Shintani, K., "The Impact of Foldable Containers on Container Fleet Management Costs in Hinterland Transport", Transportation Research Part E, 46, pp.750~763 (2010)
