Dual-energy 컴퓨터단층촬영에서 장비 제공선량과 측정선량 비교
Comparison of Estimated and Measured Doses of Dual-energy Computed Tomography
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
We will provide basic data on the evaluation of patient dose in terms of DECT quality control by comparing the equipment-provided dose with the measured dose according to the configuration method of the X-ray generator by the manufacturer of the dual-energy CT unit. For computed tomography (CT) equipment, Discovery 750HD, Aquilion ONE GENESIS Edition, and Somatom Definition Flash were used. The CTDIvol value was measured by inserting the Unfors Xi ion chamber into a 32 cm PMMA acryl Phantom. The results of estimated CTDIvol DECT and measured CTDIvol showed that the dose difference between DECT 80 + 140 kVp of G company was at least 0.51% and -1.90% max, and measured CTDIvol was slightly lower (p<0.05). The difference of 80 + 140 kVp of S company was the minimum of 5.84% and the maximum of 7.52% (p<0.05). The measured CTDIvol was less than estimated CTDIvol. The C company’s 80 + 135 kVp showed a difference of at least 7.58% and a maximum of 13.58% (P<0.05), and all of measured CTDIvol was less. The linearity of exposure dose for all DECT equipment was very linearly reflected with R2 being 0.97 or above, and the measured dose of the ionization chamber was less than the predicted dose of the monitor.
Abstract
We will provide basic data on the evaluation of patient dose in terms of DECT quality control by comparing the equipment-provided dose with the measured dose according to the configuration method of the X-ray generator by the manufacturer of the dual-energy CT unit. For computed tomography (CT) equipment, Discovery 750HD, Aquilion ONE GENESIS Edition, and Somatom Definition Flash were used. The CTDIvol value was measured by inserting the Unfors Xi ion chamber into a 32 cm PMMA acryl Phantom. The results of estimated CTDIvol DECT and measured CTDIvol showed that the dose difference between DECT 80 + 140 kVp of G company was at least 0.51% and -1.90% max, and measured CTDIvol was slightly lower (p<0.05). The difference of 80 + 140 kVp of S company was the minimum of 5.84% and the maximum of 7.52% (p<0.05). The measured CTDIvol was less than estimated CTDIvol. The C company’s 80 + 135 kVp showed a difference of at least 7.58% and a maximum of 13.58% (P<0.05), and all of measured CTDIvol was less. The linearity of exposure dose for all DECT equipment was very linearly reflected with R2 being 0.97 or above, and the measured dose of the ionization chamber was less than the predicted dose of the monitor.
참고문헌 (33)
- Flohr TG, "First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT(DSCT)system", Eur Radiol, 16(2), pp.256~268 (2006)
- Johnson TR, "Material differentiation by dual energy CT : initial experience", Eur Radiol, 17(6), pp.1510~1517 (2007)
- Yoshizumi T, "Dual Energy CT in Clinical Practice", Med Phys, 38(11), pp.6346~ (2011)
- McCollough CH, "Dual-and Multi-Energy CT : Principles, Technical Approaches, and Clinical Applications", Radiology, 276(3), pp.637~653 (2015)
- Forghani R, "Dual-Energy Computed Tomography : Physical Principles, Approaches to Scanning, Usage, and Implementation : Part 1", Neuroimaging Clin N Am, 27(3), pp.371~384 (2017)
- Lam S, "Multiparametric Evaluation of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Using a Single-Source Dual-Energy CT with Fast kVp Switching : State of the Art", Cancers(Basel), 7(4), pp.2201~2216 (2015)
- Li B, "Quantification of head and body CTDI(VOL)of dual-energy x-ray CT with fast-kVp switching", Med Phys, 38(5), pp.2595~2601 (2011)
- Omoumi P, "Dual-Energy CT : Basic Principles, Technical Approaches, and Applications in Musculoskeletal Imaging(Part 1)", Semin Musculoskelet Radiol, 19(5), pp.431~437 (2015)
- Alvarez RE, "Energy-selective reconstructions in X-ray computerized tomography", Phys Med Biol, 21(5), pp.733~744 (1976)
- Millner MR, "Extraction of information from CT scans at different energies", Med Phys, 6(1), pp.70~71 (1979)
- Karcaaltincaba M, "Dual-energy CT revisited with multidetector CT : review of principles and clinical applications", Diagn Interv Radiol, 17(3), pp.181~194 (2011)
- 김영균, "전산화단층영상검사에서 단일에너지와 이중에너지를 이용한 뼈 부피측정의 비교", 방사선기술과학, 40(2), pp.253~259 (2017), 대한방사선과학회[DOI]
- Patel BN, "Single-source dual-energy spectral multidetector CT of pancreatic adenocarcinoma : optimization of energy level viewing significantly increases lesion contrast", Clin Radiol, 68(2), pp.148~154 (2013)
- 김명성, "Quantitative Analysis of Bone Mineral Measurements in Different Types of Dual-energy Absorptiometry Systems:Comparison of CT vs DEXA", 방사선기술과학, 40(2), pp.311~316 (2017), 대한방사선과학회[DOI]
- Bamberg F, "Metal artifact reduction by dual energy computed tomography using monoenergetic extrapolation", Eur Radiol, 21(7), pp.1424~1429 (2011)
- Glazebrook KN, "Identification of intraarticular and periarticular uric acid crystals with dual-energy CT : initial evaluation", Radiology, 261(2), pp.516~524 (2011)
- Robinson E, "Dual source dual energy MDCT : comparison of 80 kVp and weighted average 120 kVp data for conspicuity of hypo-vascular liver metastases", Invest Radiol, 45(7), pp.413~418 (2010)
- Graser A, "Single-phase dual-energy CT allows for characterization of renal masses as benign or malignant", Invest Radiol, 45(7), pp.399~405 (2010)
- Chae EJ, "Clinical utility of dual-energy CT in the evaluation of solitary pulmonary nodules : initial experience", Radiology, 249(2), pp.671~681 (2008)
- Schmid-Bindert G, "Functional imaging of lung cancer using dual energy CT: how does iodine related attenuation correlate with standardized uptake value of 18FDG-PET-CT?", Eur Radiol, 22(1), pp.93~103 (2012)
- Smith-Bindman R, "Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer", Arch Intern Med, 169(22), pp.2078~2086 (2009)
- McNitt-Gray MF, "AAPM", RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents: Topics in CT. Radiation dose in CT, 2002, pp.22(6), 1541~1553
- "Med Phys", 2012, 4613~4614
- Sodickson A, "Strategies for reducing radiation exposure in multi-detector row CT", Radiol Clin North Am, 50(1), pp.1~14 (2012)
- Petersilka M, "Technical principles of dual source CT", Eur J Radiol, 68(3), pp.362~368 (2008)
- McCollough CH LS, "CT dose index and patient dose : they are not the same thing", Radiology, 259(2), pp.311~316 (2011)
- Schindera ST, "Hypervascular liver tumors : low tube voltage, high tube current multi-detector row CT for enhanced detection--phantom study", Radiology, 246(1), pp.125~132 (2008)
- Bauer RW, "Dose and image quality at CT pulmonary angiography-comparison of first and second generation dual-energy CT and 64-slice CT", Eur Radiol, 21(10), pp.2139~2147 (2011)
- 조영서, "복부-골반의 이중 에너지 CT에서의 방사선량: 단일 에너지 CT와의 비교", 대한영상의학회지, 65(5), pp.505~512 (2011), 대한영상의학회
- Purysko AS, "Comparison of radiation dose and image quality from single-energy and dual-energy CT examinations in the same patients screened for hepatocellular carcinoma", Clin Radiol, 69(12), pp.e538~e544 (2014)
- Jepperson MA, "In vivo comparison of radiation exposure of dual-energy CT versus low-dose CT versus standard CT for imaging urinary calculi", J Endourol, 29(2), pp.141~146 (2015)
- Im AL, "Dual energy CT in patients with acute abdomen; is it possible for virtual non-enhanced images to replace true non-enhanced images?", Emerg Radiol, 20(6), pp.475~483 (2013)
- Schenzle JC, "Dual energy CT of the chest : how about the dose?", Invest Radiol, 45(6), pp.347~353 (2010)