관심 영역 설정에 따른 Gates법 토리여과율의 유효성 평가
Evaluation of Validity Glomerular Filtration Rate Measured by Gates Method according Region of Interest
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) has been the subject of much research as a key indicator for diagnosing, treating, and monitoring kidney function. The gamma camera method (Gates method) is simple and allows simultaneous acquisition of GFR and renal scintigraphy for each kidney, however its accuracy is inferior. This study aimed to investigate changes in GFR depending on how region of interest (ROI) are set up, which is one of many factors influencing accuracy. GFR was calculated by setting the ROI for each phase of the image acquisition time (Gates-1: 0∼1 minutes, Gates-2: 1∼3 minutes, Gates-3: 3∼27 minutes), and statistical significance was verified based on probability value 0.05 through ANOVA analysis. While there was no statistically significant difference among results from Gates-1, 2, 3 (p=0.481>0.05), overall results from the Gates method tended to overestimate compared to those from the multiple blood sampling-dual exponential (MBSDE) method. When comparing averages between phases, results from Gates-2 were most similar to those from the MBSDE method. Moreover, paired t-test p-values between MBSDE method and phases were as follows Gates-1: 0.021 (p<0.05), Gates-2: 0.280 (p>0.05), and Gates-3: 0.164 (p>0.05) indicating that only Gates-1 had statistically significant differences compared with MBSDE method. Thus, setting ROI around 2∼3 minutes is calculated can aid in accurately determining GFR when Gates Method.
Abstract
The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) has been the subject of much research as a key indicator for diagnosing, treating, and monitoring kidney function. The gamma camera method (Gates method) is simple and allows simultaneous acquisition of GFR and renal scintigraphy for each kidney, however its accuracy is inferior. This study aimed to investigate changes in GFR depending on how region of interest (ROI) are set up, which is one of many factors influencing accuracy. GFR was calculated by setting the ROI for each phase of the image acquisition time (Gates-1: 0∼1 minutes, Gates-2: 1∼3 minutes, Gates-3: 3∼27 minutes), and statistical significance was verified based on probability value 0.05 through ANOVA analysis. While there was no statistically significant difference among results from Gates-1, 2, 3 (p=0.481>0.05), overall results from the Gates method tended to overestimate compared to those from the multiple blood sampling-dual exponential (MBSDE) method. When comparing averages between phases, results from Gates-2 were most similar to those from the MBSDE method. Moreover, paired t-test p-values between MBSDE method and phases were as follows Gates-1: 0.021 (p<0.05), Gates-2: 0.280 (p>0.05), and Gates-3: 0.164 (p>0.05) indicating that only Gates-1 had statistically significant differences compared with MBSDE method. Thus, setting ROI around 2∼3 minutes is calculated can aid in accurately determining GFR when Gates Method.
참고문헌 (32)
- Rule AD, "Measured and estimated GFR in healthy potential kidney donors", Am J Kidney Dis, 43(1), pp.112~119 (2004)[DOI]
- Bianchi C, "Noninvasive methods for the measurement of total renal function", Nephron, 28(2), pp.53~57 (1981)[DOI]
- 이창화, "임상에서 사용하는 사구체여과율의 평가 공식", 대한내과학회지, 83(4), pp.455~457 (2012), 대한내과학회[DOI]
- 이나미, "소아 환아에서 다양한 사구체 여과율 측정법의 비교", Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics, 52(9), pp.999~1004 (2009), 대한소아청소년과학회
- Barbour GL, "Comparison of inulin, iothalamate and 99mTc-DTPA for measurement of glomerular filtration rate", J Nucl Med, 17(4), pp.317~320 (1976)[DOI]
- Price M, "Comparison of creatinine clearance to inulin clearance in the determination of glomerular filtration rate", J Urol, 107(3), pp.339~340 (1972)[DOI]
- Sigman EM, "The renal clearance of I-131 labelled sodium iothalamate in man", Invest Urol, 2, pp.432~438 (1965)[DOI]
- Cohen ML, "A simple reliable method of measuring glomerular filtration rate using single low dose sodium iothalamate I-131", Pediatrics, 43(3), pp.407~415 (1969)[DOI]
- Cockcroft DW, "Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine", Nephron, 16(1), pp.31~41 (1976)[DOI]
- Levey AS, "A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine : A new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group", Ann Intern Med, 130(6), pp.461~470 (1999)[DOI]
- Myers GL, "Recommendations for improving serum creatinine measurement : A report from the laboratory working group of the national kidney disease education program", Clin Chem, 52(1), pp.5~18 (2006)[DOI]
- 장윤식, "사구체 여과율의 측정 방법", Kidney Research and Clinical Practice, 25(4), pp.521~524 (2006), 대한신장학회
- 한금현, "사구체 여과율의 지표로서 혈청 크레아티닌과 비교한 혈청 Cystatin C 농도", Kidney Research and Clinical Practice, 25(5), pp.737~744 (2006), 대한신장학회
- Stevens LA, "Assessing kidney function-measured and estimated glomerular filtration rate", N Engl J Med, 354(23), pp.2473~2483 (2006)[DOI]
- Jones JD, "Creatinine metabolism in humans with decreased renal function : Creatinine deficit", Clin Chem, 20(9), pp.1204~1212 (1974)[DOI]
- Ell PJ, "Nuclear medicine in clinical diagnosis and treatment", pp.1537~1545 (2004), Churchil Livingstone
- Mulligan JS, "Methods for measuring GFR with technetium-99m-DTPA : An analysis of several common methods", J Nucl Med, 31(7), pp.1211~1219 (1990)[DOI]
- Balachandran S, "Comparative evaluation of quantitative glomerular filtration rate measured by isotopic and nonisotopic methods", Clin Nucl Med, 6(4), pp.150~153 (1981)[DOI]
- Gates GF, "Glomerular filtration rate : Estimation from fractional renal accumulation of 99mTc-DTPA(stannous)", AJR Am J Roentgenol, 138(3), pp.565~570 (1982)[DOI]
- Yoo IR, "Development of formulas for the estimation of renal depth and application in the measurement of glomerular filtration rate in Koreans", Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 34(5), pp.418~425 (2000)[DOI]
- Chachati A, "Rapid method for the measurement of differential renal function : Validation", J Nucl Med, 28(5), pp.829~836 (1987)[DOI]
- 박훈희, "핵의학 동적 신장팬텀시스템 개발 적용의 유용성 평가", 방사선기술과학, 36(1), pp.49~55 (2013), 대한방사선과학회
- Kim H, "Comparison of activity capacity change and GFR value change according to matrix size during 99mTc-DTPA renal dynamic scan", J Nucl Med Technol, 24(1), pp.27~32 (2020)[DOI]
- 정현석, "다양한 배후 방사능 설정에 따른 Gates 법 사구체 여과율의 차이: I-125-Iothalamate 측정법과의 비교", Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 38(4), pp.306~310 (2004), 대한핵의학회
- 이은별, "99mTc-MAG3를 이용한 상대적 신장 기능 평가 시 신장 깊이에 따른 기하평균 적용의 유용성 평가", 방사선기술과학, 39(2), pp.199~208 (2016), 대한방사선과학회[DOI]
- Chung JK, "Koh’s nuclear medicine", pp.639~ (2008), Korea Medical Book Publishing Company
- Kang YG, "Textbook of Neclear Medicine", pp.510~ (2013), Chung-Ku Publisher
- Taylor A, "Improved formulas for the estimation of renal depth in adults", J Nucl Med, 34(10), pp.1766~1769 (1993)[DOI]
- O'Reilly PH, "Nuclear medicine in urology and nephrology", pp.247~270 (1986), Butterworth
- Schlegel JU, "Determination of filtration fraction using the gamma scintillation camera", J Urol, 122(4), pp.447~450 (1979)[DOI]
- Gates GF, "Computation of glomerular filtration rate with Tc-99m DTPA : An in-house computer program", J Nucl Med, 25(5), pp.613~618 (1984)[DOI]
- Schlegel JU, "Individual renal plasma flow determination in 2 minutes", J Urol, 116(3), pp.282~285 (1976)[DOI]