관상동맥 조영술 시 영상 저장 방법에 따른 선량의 감소 효과와 화질평가
Evaluation of Dose Reduction Effects and Image Quality Based on Storage Methods in Coronary Angiography
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study evaluated the effects of dose reduction and image quality based on storage methods in coronary angiography. Using five commonly used views—AP view (0°, 0°), LAO Cranial view (30°, 40°), LAO Caudal view (45°, 30°), RAO Caudal view (30°, 20°), and RAO Cranial view (30°, 30°)—we compared doses by measuring Air Kerma and Dose Area Product (DAP) values. Image quality was assessed by calculating the Contrast to Noise Ratio (CNR) and Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR) using MATLAB. Comparing the control group using cine imaging storage methods with the experimental group using simple fluoroscopy methods, we found that the average Air Kerma value was reduced by up to 87.3%, with an average reduction of 77.1% across the five views. The average DAP value decreased by up to 87.9%, with an average reduction of 78.1%, and we confirmed statistically significant reductions in average Air Kerma and DAP values across all five views. In terms of image quality, the control group showed significantly higher SNR and CNR values in the RAO cranial, LAO cranial, and True AP views, while the experimental group had higher SNR and CNR values in the RAO caudal view. In the LAO caudal view, the experimental group also did not show a statistically significant difference at 1point. However, the CNR value was higher, and the SNR values were significantly higher in the experimental group at both points. In conclusion, using simple fluoroscopy for image storage in coronary angiography is an effective method for reducing radiation dose compared to cine imaging methods.
Abstract
This study evaluated the effects of dose reduction and image quality based on storage methods in coronary angiography. Using five commonly used views—AP view (0°, 0°), LAO Cranial view (30°, 40°), LAO Caudal view (45°, 30°), RAO Caudal view (30°, 20°), and RAO Cranial view (30°, 30°)—we compared doses by measuring Air Kerma and Dose Area Product (DAP) values. Image quality was assessed by calculating the Contrast to Noise Ratio (CNR) and Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR) using MATLAB. Comparing the control group using cine imaging storage methods with the experimental group using simple fluoroscopy methods, we found that the average Air Kerma value was reduced by up to 87.3%, with an average reduction of 77.1% across the five views. The average DAP value decreased by up to 87.9%, with an average reduction of 78.1%, and we confirmed statistically significant reductions in average Air Kerma and DAP values across all five views. In terms of image quality, the control group showed significantly higher SNR and CNR values in the RAO cranial, LAO cranial, and True AP views, while the experimental group had higher SNR and CNR values in the RAO caudal view. In the LAO caudal view, the experimental group also did not show a statistically significant difference at 1point. However, the CNR value was higher, and the SNR values were significantly higher in the experimental group at both points. In conclusion, using simple fluoroscopy for image storage in coronary angiography is an effective method for reducing radiation dose compared to cine imaging methods.
참고문헌 (17)
- Report on cause of death statistics, "Statistics Korea", ~ (2022)
- Kang, "Reduction of radiation dose according to geometric parameter from digital coronary angiography", Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology, 7(4), pp.277~284 (2013)[DOI]
- Lim DH, "Patient exposure dose reduction in coronary angiography & intervention", J Radiol Sci Technol, 45(1), pp.69~76 (2022)[DOI]
- Smith-Bindman R, "Use of diagnostic imaging studies and associated radiation exposure for patients enrolled in large integrated health care systems, 1996-2010", JAMA, 307(22), pp.2400~2409 (2012)[DOI]
- Nickoloff EL, "Influence of flat-panel fluoroscopic equipment variables on cardiac radiation doses", Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 30(6), pp.169~176 (2007)[DOI]
- Kong CG, "Evaluation of roadmap image quality by parameter change in angiography", J Korean Soc Radiol, 14(1), pp.53~60 (2022)[DOI]
- Roguin A, "Brain and neck tumors among physicians performing interventional procedures", The American Journal of Cardiology, 111(9), pp.1368~1372 (2013)[DOI]
- Blettner M, "Medical exposure to ionising radiation and the risk of brain tumours : Interphone study group, Germany", European Journal of Cancer, 43(13), pp.1990~1998 (2007)[DOI]
- Padovani R, "Retrospective evaluation of occurrence of skin injuries in interventional cardiac procedures", Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 117(1-3), pp.247~250 (2005)[DOI]
- Imanishi Y, "Radiation-induced temporary hair loss as a radiation damage only occurring in patients who had the combination of MDCT and DSA", European Radiology, 15(3), pp.41~46 (2005)
- Cousins C, "ICRP Publication 120 : Radiological Protection in Cardiology", Ann ICRP, 42(1), pp.1~125 (2013)[DOI]
- Laskey WK, "Changes in the practice of percutaneous coronary intervention : A comparison of enrollment waves in the national heart, lung, and blood institute(NHLBI)dynamic registry", The American Journal of Cardiology, 87(8), pp.964~969 (2001)[DOI]
- Padovani R, "Retrospective evaluation of occurrence of skin injuries in interventional cardiac procedures", Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 117(1-3), pp.247~250 (2005)[DOI]
- Hamada N, "Noncancer effects of ionizing radiation exposure on the eye, the circulatory system and beyond : Developments made since the 2011 ICRP Statement on Tissue Reactions", Radiation Research, 200(2) (2023)[DOI]
- Shah B, "Effectiveness of fluorography versus cineangiography at reducing radiation exposure during diagnostic coronary angiography", The American Journal of Cardiology, 113(7), pp.1093~1098 (2014)[DOI]
- Wang WH, "Radiation reduction and protection for radiosensitive organs(Lens, Thyroid, and Genital Organs)of patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention-real-world measurement of radiation dose in a single center", JCDD, 8(8), pp.99~ (2021)[DOI]
- Cesaro A, "Transradial access versus transfemoral access : A comparison of outcomes and efficacy in reducing hemorrhagic events", Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy, 17(6), pp.435~447 (2019)[DOI]