한국 근대의 기하학적 추상 디자인과 추상미술 담론: 1920-30년대의 잡지 표지 디자인을 중심으로
Division of Abstract: Geometric abstract design of magazine cover and the discourse on abstract painting in 1920-30s Modern Korea
0
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper researched and analyzed the geometric abstract cover design of Korean Modern magazines in 1920-30s. These designs are worthy of notice because in the history of Korean modern art there are a few abstract paintings including geometric ones. This paper surveyed geometric abstract cover design of five kinds of modern magazines-<Siningan(New Human)>, <Sidae gongron(Public Discourse of Times)>, <Haebang(Liberation)>, <Jaeilsun(The First Line)>, <Singyedan(New Stair)>, <Sinsegi(New Century)> which were published from late 1920s to middle 1930s. These geometric abstract cover designs represented a new vision for upcoming modern age and their will to construct the modern society of a new culture. Magazines' titles mean new human, new century, new stair of future, the first line forwards new culture. These geometric cover designs were introduced and disseminated through several ways. Designer such as An Sukju who studied in the early 1920s of Japan composed some new types of abstract cover. Lee Soonsuk learned his Bauhaus style abstract design in Tokyo Art School and had a welcome-home show including several book cover designs of geometric abstract. Kim Gyutaek, a cartoonist and illustrator designed most covers of <Jaeilsun>, which were similar to Japanese commercial graphic design. Some Korean designers and students could read <Gendai shogyo bijutsui zenshu(The Complete Commercial Artist)>, a twenty-four volume illustrated compendium of commercial design published in Japan, which was owned by Gyonsung Commercial High School library. Magazines published in Japan like <Genchiku sekai(World of Construction)> flowed to colony Chosun and these magazines gave a chance to see new geometric abstract designs. Geometric abstract images, a sign of modernism, visible on magazines covers could not be seen on the painting canvas of same period. In the champ of art discourse, a hegemony was in the mouths of nationalists and socialists and the modernism painting was criticized as art decadent. In the late 1930s, some new artists who took a avant-garde attitude and learned geometric abstract painting in Japan asserted that Korean art scene must accept their abstract paintings. But the geometric abstract painting was rejected by a conservative painter O Ziho and criticised by a aesthetician and Gyongsung university professor Go Yusup, a socialist writer Im Wha and other intellectuals, whose critics influenced the young avant-garde artists. The artists compromised their abstract. Therefore a sign of nationality and traditionality or morality and spirituality such as a white porcelain, a cow and a mountain appeared in their painting afterward. This eclecticism met a need of times. The times of colonized nation made the intellectuals not be able to accept modernism, a symbol of capitalism of empire, commodities of colonial commerce, without a compensation of ethics. But the magazine cover area was free from this claim for ethics because their position in hierarchy of images was low. Abstract image was on the border line between high art and low commercial design.
Abstract
This paper researched and analyzed the geometric abstract cover design of Korean Modern magazines in 1920-30s. These designs are worthy of notice because in the history of Korean modern art there are a few abstract paintings including geometric ones. This paper surveyed geometric abstract cover design of five kinds of modern magazines-<Siningan(New Human)>, <Sidae gongron(Public Discourse of Times)>, <Haebang(Liberation)>, <Jaeilsun(The First Line)>, <Singyedan(New Stair)>, <Sinsegi(New Century)> which were published from late 1920s to middle 1930s. These geometric abstract cover designs represented a new vision for upcoming modern age and their will to construct the modern society of a new culture. Magazines' titles mean new human, new century, new stair of future, the first line forwards new culture. These geometric cover designs were introduced and disseminated through several ways. Designer such as An Sukju who studied in the early 1920s of Japan composed some new types of abstract cover. Lee Soonsuk learned his Bauhaus style abstract design in Tokyo Art School and had a welcome-home show including several book cover designs of geometric abstract. Kim Gyutaek, a cartoonist and illustrator designed most covers of <Jaeilsun>, which were similar to Japanese commercial graphic design. Some Korean designers and students could read <Gendai shogyo bijutsui zenshu(The Complete Commercial Artist)>, a twenty-four volume illustrated compendium of commercial design published in Japan, which was owned by Gyonsung Commercial High School library. Magazines published in Japan like <Genchiku sekai(World of Construction)> flowed to colony Chosun and these magazines gave a chance to see new geometric abstract designs. Geometric abstract images, a sign of modernism, visible on magazines covers could not be seen on the painting canvas of same period. In the champ of art discourse, a hegemony was in the mouths of nationalists and socialists and the modernism painting was criticized as art decadent. In the late 1930s, some new artists who took a avant-garde attitude and learned geometric abstract painting in Japan asserted that Korean art scene must accept their abstract paintings. But the geometric abstract painting was rejected by a conservative painter O Ziho and criticised by a aesthetician and Gyongsung university professor Go Yusup, a socialist writer Im Wha and other intellectuals, whose critics influenced the young avant-garde artists. The artists compromised their abstract. Therefore a sign of nationality and traditionality or morality and spirituality such as a white porcelain, a cow and a mountain appeared in their painting afterward. This eclecticism met a need of times. The times of colonized nation made the intellectuals not be able to accept modernism, a symbol of capitalism of empire, commodities of colonial commerce, without a compensation of ethics. But the magazine cover area was free from this claim for ethics because their position in hierarchy of images was low. Abstract image was on the border line between high art and low commercial design.
참고문헌 (22)
- 고바야시 ??스케(小林俊介), "1920년대 후반에서 1930년대 초반까지 일본의 추상예술", 미술이론과 현장, 0(3), pp.117~134 (2005), 한국미술이론학회
- 고봉준, "1930년대 경성과 이상의 모더니즘", 문화과학, (45) (2006)
- 구경화, "이순석의 생애와 작품", 석사, pp.1999
- 김근수, "문화정치 표방시대의 잡지 개관", 한국잡지자료총서제1집: 한국잡지개관 및 호별목차집 (1973), 한국학연구소
- 김미영, "일제하 천도교신파의 <신인간>지 연구", 석사, pp.2004
- 김미정, "한국 앵포르멜과 대한민국미술전람회-1960년대 초반 정치적 변혁기를 중심으로", 한국근현대미술사학(구 한국근대미술사학), (12), pp.301~342 (2004), 한국근현대미술사학회(구 한국근대미술사학회)
- 김민수, "현대디자인과 추상성의 발현:1930년대-1960년대", 조형, (18) (1995), 서울대믿부설 조형연구소
- 김영나, "1930년대 동경 유학생들", 근대한국미술논총 (1992), 학고재
- 김영나, "20세기의 한국미술2-변화와 도전의 시기" (2010), 예경
- 서울대학교 미술대학 응용미술학과 동문회, "하라 이순석" (1993)
- 오광수, "추상, 우리에게 어떤 의미가 있는가?", 미술이론과 현장, 0(3), pp.109~116 (2005), 한국미술이론학회
- 윤해동, "천도교 김기전의 근대수용과 민족주의", 역사문제연구, (창간) (1996)
- 이유림, "안석주 신문소설 삽화연구:1920년대를 중심으로", 석사, pp.2007
- 이인범, "추상, 그 미학적 담론의 초기 현상-1930년대 한국의 경우", 미술이론과 현장, 0(3), pp.135~154 (2005), 한국미술이론학회
- 이인범, "미술, in: 한국현대예술사대계-1960년대" (2001), 시공사
- 조은정, "안석주의 미술비평에 대한 연구", 한국근현대미술사학(구 한국근대미술사학), (17), pp.7~46 (2006), 한국근현대미술사학회(구 한국근대미술사학회)
- 최공호, "殖産興業정책과 한국근대 공예도안-明治도안의 수용과 전개, in: 근대미술연구" (2005), 국립현대미술관
- 최덕교, "한국잡지백년 2" (2004), 현암사
- 최열, "1920년대 민족만화운동-김동성과 안석주를 중심으로", 역사비평, (2) (1988)
- 홍선표, "한국근대미술사-갑오개혁에서 해방시기까지" (2009), 예경
- 濱田增治, "現代商業美術全集" (1930), アルス
- Gennifer Weisenfeld, "Japanese Modernism and Consumerism" (2000), University of Hawai'i Press
