미술사와 민족국가주의
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This essay purports to be in the relationship of art history and nationalism, especially a methodology for carrying out researches on writing Korean art history in order to submit an agenda for the theme <Art History and ‘Here Now’> of the Korean Society of Art History that commemorates the 20th anniversary. An aesthetician Arthur Danto indicates the declining of the nationalist tendency as remarked that nationalism vanished completely though it had the practical aims and the art world that has a multiplicity of centers seems to be one nation that has its own a sovereignty. As the recent art theory becomes more complex as well as the many different fields to globalize is necessary. But a major topic in Korea art history is still linked directly or indirectly with the ideological nationalism. We can easily find a superiority complex in the words such as ‘national’, ‘people’, ‘native’, ‘autogenous’, ‘self-conceit’, and ‘self-respect’ used in many writings for giving an account of Korean art history. Nationalism had an affirmative role in the antagonized discourse for making a strong stand against the colonialism. On the one hand ‘nationalism’ or ‘state’ was the basic concept of the effective modality in order to spread out a realization of modern art and art history. Obviously the realization of modern art, art history, and modern state have the same root genetically. However, ideological nationalism in a point of today's view is irrelevant for learning that must be the pursuit of universal validity. In this sense a criticism for nationalism is required in writing Korean art history. Yet we still can inquire a possibility and limit of exploring the relationship between art history and independent state in writing Korean art history. If we can extricate Korean art history from the domain of the religion of a people do then and not till then we will succeed in placing Korean art history on the universal state of art.
Abstract
This essay purports to be in the relationship of art history and nationalism, especially a methodology for carrying out researches on writing Korean art history in order to submit an agenda for the theme <Art History and ‘Here Now’> of the Korean Society of Art History that commemorates the 20th anniversary. An aesthetician Arthur Danto indicates the declining of the nationalist tendency as remarked that nationalism vanished completely though it had the practical aims and the art world that has a multiplicity of centers seems to be one nation that has its own a sovereignty. As the recent art theory becomes more complex as well as the many different fields to globalize is necessary. But a major topic in Korea art history is still linked directly or indirectly with the ideological nationalism. We can easily find a superiority complex in the words such as ‘national’, ‘people’, ‘native’, ‘autogenous’, ‘self-conceit’, and ‘self-respect’ used in many writings for giving an account of Korean art history. Nationalism had an affirmative role in the antagonized discourse for making a strong stand against the colonialism. On the one hand ‘nationalism’ or ‘state’ was the basic concept of the effective modality in order to spread out a realization of modern art and art history. Obviously the realization of modern art, art history, and modern state have the same root genetically. However, ideological nationalism in a point of today's view is irrelevant for learning that must be the pursuit of universal validity. In this sense a criticism for nationalism is required in writing Korean art history. Yet we still can inquire a possibility and limit of exploring the relationship between art history and independent state in writing Korean art history. If we can extricate Korean art history from the domain of the religion of a people do then and not till then we will succeed in placing Korean art history on the universal state of art.
참고문헌 (19)
- 고유섭, "조선고대미술의 특색과 그 전승문제 in: 고유섭전집 ,3" (1993), 통문관
- 안휘준, "한국회화의 전통" (1988), 문예출판사
- 윤해동, "식민지의 회색지대" (2003), 역사비평사
- 이인범, "조선예술과 야나기 무네요시" (1999), 시공사
- 이인범, "정체성규명과 해석가능성 모색 사이-‘한국예술’의 재 담론화를 위한 소고", 미학예술학연구, 13 (2001)
- 이인범, "한국박물관제도의 기원과 성격-국민국가주의를 넘어서", 미술사논단, (10) (2002)
- 최완수, "겸재정선과 진경산수화풍 in: 진경시대 2 - 예술과 예술가들" (1998), 돌베게
- 佐藤道信, "明治國家と近代美術-美の政治學" (1999), 吉川弘文館
- 柄谷行人, "柄谷行人集 , 4" (2004), 岩波書店
- 강상중, "내셔널리즘" (2004), 이산
- 西川長夫, "國民國家論の射程－あるいは<國民>という怪物について－" (1998), 柏書房
- Hans Sedlmayer, "Idee einer Vergleichende Kunstwissenschaft ; 比較藝術學硏究 , 1" (1974), 日本 美術出版社
- Arthur C. Danto, "After the End of Art : Contemporary Art and the Pale of History" (1997), Princeton University Press
- Benedict Anderson, "Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism" (2002), 나남출판사
- Jacob Burckhardt, "The Civilization of the Renaissance in Italy" (1999), 푸른숲
- J. J. Winckelmann, "Gedanken über die Nachahamung der grieschen Werke in der Malerlei und Bildhauerkunst" (1995), 이론과 실천
- H. A. Taine, "Histoire de la littrature anglaise, Tome 1" (1984), 경문사
- H. Wölfflin, "Kunstgeschichtliche Grundbegriffe, 1915" (1994), 시공사
- Helen Searing, "Musem ; The Dictionary of Art, vol.22" (1996), Grove’s Dictionary Inc.