‘한국적 모더니즘’의 창안: 1970년대 단색조 회화
The Creation of ‘Korean Modernism’: Monochrome painting of 1970’s
0
조회
0
다운로드
12
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Silence could be symbol of unyielding resistance or apathetic indifference upon its context. Restoring the political and social conditions of 1970’s developed around monochorome painting, the rhetoric of its ‘Korean Modernism’ such as fine art detached from any other social realities, spiritual emptiness, hermit’s asceticism, or abstinence of Taoism, could not be read as itself. The achievement of monochrome painting could be discursive reproduction of political and economical dynamics of 1970’s as well as cultural and artistic breakthrough. Behind the transcendental silence, artists of monochrome could find out not only an aesthetic retreat from social oppressions but also an artistic alignment with the political dictatorship of Yushin government imposed by President Park Jeong-Hee. While ignoring political conflicts and social struggles, they showed smart response to the opportunities of international exhibitions, and got successful careers in commercial art market which newly developed in Korean art scene replacing the academicism of National Art Exhibition. They engaged in exclusive aestheic formalism which had flourished in America especially after World War Ⅱ, then found out safe and comfortable refuge in the Korean tradition carefully selected and encouraged by Korean government. As a result, they blocked out different ways of art and experiments of avant-garde as well as modernization of different traditions. The ‘Korean Modernism’ of Monochrome painting was restricted achievement of specific social groups and artists. It was a product of alliance between enforced ‘modernization’ and invented ‘tradition’ under the censorship of military government. They never resolved and overcame the dilemma of post-colonial modernizaion, that derived from double subjects of Western forms and Korean tradition. As a most successful Korean Modern Art, Monochrome painting erased out the possibilities of different ways of modern art, challenges of pluralism, voices of different classes and genders. Then in 1980’s Korean art scene witnessed the strong reaction of people’s art, ‘Minjungmisool’, which arguing social and political participation. The confrontation between Monochrome and Minjungmisool continued until the emergence of ‘New Generation’ in the mid 1990’s.
Abstract
Silence could be symbol of unyielding resistance or apathetic indifference upon its context. Restoring the political and social conditions of 1970’s developed around monochorome painting, the rhetoric of its ‘Korean Modernism’ such as fine art detached from any other social realities, spiritual emptiness, hermit’s asceticism, or abstinence of Taoism, could not be read as itself. The achievement of monochrome painting could be discursive reproduction of political and economical dynamics of 1970’s as well as cultural and artistic breakthrough. Behind the transcendental silence, artists of monochrome could find out not only an aesthetic retreat from social oppressions but also an artistic alignment with the political dictatorship of Yushin government imposed by President Park Jeong-Hee. While ignoring political conflicts and social struggles, they showed smart response to the opportunities of international exhibitions, and got successful careers in commercial art market which newly developed in Korean art scene replacing the academicism of National Art Exhibition. They engaged in exclusive aestheic formalism which had flourished in America especially after World War Ⅱ, then found out safe and comfortable refuge in the Korean tradition carefully selected and encouraged by Korean government. As a result, they blocked out different ways of art and experiments of avant-garde as well as modernization of different traditions. The ‘Korean Modernism’ of Monochrome painting was restricted achievement of specific social groups and artists. It was a product of alliance between enforced ‘modernization’ and invented ‘tradition’ under the censorship of military government. They never resolved and overcame the dilemma of post-colonial modernizaion, that derived from double subjects of Western forms and Korean tradition. As a most successful Korean Modern Art, Monochrome painting erased out the possibilities of different ways of modern art, challenges of pluralism, voices of different classes and genders. Then in 1980’s Korean art scene witnessed the strong reaction of people’s art, ‘Minjungmisool’, which arguing social and political participation. The confrontation between Monochrome and Minjungmisool continued until the emergence of ‘New Generation’ in the mid 1990’s.
참고문헌 (45)
- 강태, "현대미술과 시각문화" (2007), 눈빛
- 갤러리현대, "35주년 기념전 The 35th Anniversary Exhibition" (2005), 전시도록
- 갤러리현대, "1970년대 한국의 모노크롬" (1996), 전시도록
- 갤러리현대, "박서보" (1981), 전시도록
- 국립현대미술관, "사유와 감성의 시대:한국현대미술의 전개 1970년대 중반-1980년대 중반" (2002), 도서출판 삶과 꿈
- 김미경, "한국현대미술자료 略史 1960-1979" (2003), ICAS
- 김미경, "한국의 실험미술" (2003), 시공사
- 김복영, "현대미술연구" (1985), 정음문화사
- 김영작, "한국 내셔널리즘의 전개와 글로벌리즘" (2006), 백산서당
- 김창남, "유신문화의 이중성과 대항문화", 역사비평, 통권 : 32호 (1995), 역사비평사
- 류병학, "일그러진 우리들의 영웅" (2001), 아침미디어
- 류정아, "미술문화의 소비현상과 화랑의 역할, in: 한국인의 소비와 여가생활" (1997), 한국정신문화연구원
- 문화공보부, "민족기록화 도록-경제편" (1973), 광명출판사
- 박혜성, "1960-1970년대 민족기록화 연구", 석사, 서양화과, pp.2003
- 부르디외 피에르, "구별짓기-문화와 취향의 사회학 La Distinction-critique sociale du jugement" (2006), 새물결
- 부산시립미술관, "한국단색회화의 이념과 정신" (1998), 전시도록
- 부산시립미술관, "정신으로서의 평면" (2000), 전시도록
- 삼성미술관, "이우환-만남을 찾아서" (2003), 전시도록
- 서성록, "한국의 현대미술" (1994), 문예출판사
- 서성록, "박서보,앵포르멜에서 단색화까지" (2000), 도서출판 재원
- 앤더슨 베네딕트, "상상의 공동체 Imagined Community" (2004), 나남
- 역사문제연구소, "전통과 서구의 충돌 : 한국적 근대성은 어떻게 형성되었는가" (2005), 역사비평사
- 오광수, "한국 현대미술의 미의식" (1995), 재원
- 오광수, "한국 추상미술 40년" (1997), 재원
- 오명석, "1960-70년대의 문화정책과 민족문화 담론", 비교문화연구, (4) (1998), 서울대학교 비교문화연구소
- 오상길, "한국현대미술 다시 읽기 Ⅲ" (2003), ICAS
- 유선영, "과민족화 프로젝트와 호스티스 영화, in: 국가와 일상:박정희 시대" (2008), 한울
- 윤진섭, "한국 모더니즘 미술 연구" (2000), 재원
- 원용진, "한국 대중문화, 미국과 함께 혹은 따로, in: 아메리카나이제이션 : 해방 이후 한국에서의 미국화" (2008), 푸른역사
- 이옥경, "1970년대 대중문화의 성격", 한국사회변동연구 (1984), 역사와 기독교 제10집,민중사
- 이우영, "박정희 민족주의의 반민족성", 역사비평, (12) (1990), 역사문제연구소
- 이인범, "미술, in: 한국현대 예술사대계 Ⅳ 1970년대" (2004), 시공아트
- 이 일, "현대미술의 시각" (1985), 미진사
- 임지현, "대중독재:강제와 동의 사이에서" (2004), 책세상
- 전재호, "박정희 체제의 민족주의 연구:담론과 정책 중심으로", 박사, pp.1997
- 정호기, "일상공간 속의 영웅과 애국주의, in: 국가와 일상 : 박정희 시대" (2008), 한울
- 조희연, "동원된 근대화:박정희 개발동원체제의 정치사회적 이중성" (2010), 후마니타스
- 주창윤, "1970년대 청년문화 세대담론의 정치학", 언론과 사회, 14(3), pp.73~105 (2006), 성곡언론문화재단
- 줄레조 발레리, "아파트 공화국-프랑스 지리학자가 본 한국의 아파트" (2007), 도서출판 후마니타스
- 최병식, "미술시장과 경영" (2001), 동문선
- 최연식, "박정희 시대 근대화 담론 속의 전통", 전통과 현대, (22) (2002), 전통과 현대사
- 통인화랑, "박서보" (1976), 전시도록
- 한국현대미술사연구회, "한국 현대미술 197080" (2005), 학연문화사
- 한원갤러리, "한국현대미술의 ‘한국성’ 모색 Ⅱ" (1991), 전시도록
- 홉스봄 에, "만들어진 전통 The Invention of Tradition" (2008), 휴머니스트
