계약운송인으로서 해상운송주선인의 법적 지위
Legal Status on the Ocean Freight Forwarder as a Contracting Carrier
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
A freight forwarder plays an important role in the modern international carriage of goods. However, the rules regulating a freight forwarder is not well organized in the Korean legal system. A freight forwarder has three different kinds of function such as an intermediary, an agent or a carrier. First he plays as the pure intermediary between the carrier and the shipper, which falls within the original definition of the freight forwarder. Second, he acts as the agent of the shipper or of the carrier. Third, he acts as the contracting carrier by entering contract of carriage of goods with the shipper or by issuing bill of lading. A contracting carrier means any person by whom or in whose name a contract of carriage of goods by sea has been concluded with a shipper. A freight forwarder as a contracting carrier is defined to be the person who, as a party to the carriage contract, undertake the responsibility for the entire period of transportation upon issuing the bill of lading as the carrier performing all the services such as arranging for consolidation, warehousing,loading, carrying, taking insurance and delivery of the goods, from the moment of receipt of the goods from a shipper until delivery. The Korean Supreme Court held that even if a freight forwarder is provided with a shipping-related work, if it is not clear whether it is for carriage or forwarding only, it shall be verified by reaching the intention of the party whether the freight forwarder has obtained the status of carrier or not, but if the intention of the party is not clear, it shall be verified through a comprehensive consideration of all circumstances including but not limited to the names of the issuer of the house bill of lading and the payment method of the fee. This article focus on the legal status on the freight forwarder not as an agent of the shipper or of the carrier and as the intermediary, but as the contracting carrier.
Abstract
A freight forwarder plays an important role in the modern international carriage of goods. However, the rules regulating a freight forwarder is not well organized in the Korean legal system. A freight forwarder has three different kinds of function such as an intermediary, an agent or a carrier. First he plays as the pure intermediary between the carrier and the shipper, which falls within the original definition of the freight forwarder. Second, he acts as the agent of the shipper or of the carrier. Third, he acts as the contracting carrier by entering contract of carriage of goods with the shipper or by issuing bill of lading. A contracting carrier means any person by whom or in whose name a contract of carriage of goods by sea has been concluded with a shipper. A freight forwarder as a contracting carrier is defined to be the person who, as a party to the carriage contract, undertake the responsibility for the entire period of transportation upon issuing the bill of lading as the carrier performing all the services such as arranging for consolidation, warehousing,loading, carrying, taking insurance and delivery of the goods, from the moment of receipt of the goods from a shipper until delivery. The Korean Supreme Court held that even if a freight forwarder is provided with a shipping-related work, if it is not clear whether it is for carriage or forwarding only, it shall be verified by reaching the intention of the party whether the freight forwarder has obtained the status of carrier or not, but if the intention of the party is not clear, it shall be verified through a comprehensive consideration of all circumstances including but not limited to the names of the issuer of the house bill of lading and the payment method of the fee. This article focus on the legal status on the freight forwarder not as an agent of the shipper or of the carrier and as the intermediary, but as the contracting carrier.
참고문헌 (34)
- 김성태, "상법총칙 상행위법강론" (1998), 법문사
- 김인현, "해상법" (2007), 법문사
- 김정호, "상법강의(상)" (2001), 법문사
- 박용섭, "해상법론" (1998), 형설출판사
- 손주찬, "상법(상)", pp.335~ (2004), 박영사
- 손주찬, "(제3판)" (2003), 한국사법행정학회
- 이범찬, "상법(상)(제2판)" (2001), 삼영사
- 이철송, "상법총칙·상행위" (2009), 박영사
- 임홍근, "상법(총칙·상행위)", pp.409~ (2001), 법문사
- 정동윤, "상법총칙·상행위법" (1996), 법문사
- 정찬형, "상법강의(상)" (2010), 박영사
- 채이식, "상법(상) 및 상법(하)" (2003), 박영사
- 최기원, "상법학신론(상) 및 해상법" (2008), 박영사
- 김동훈, "定期傭船契約에 대한 法的 檢討", 한국해법학회지, 24(2), pp.11~44 (2002), 한국해법학회
- 金性倬, "周旋業者의 介入權", 기업법연구, 12, pp.275~297 (2003), 한국기업법학회
- 김인현, "運送周旋人의 다양한 法的 地位에 따른 法律關係 - 海上運送周旋人을 중심으로 -", 안암법학, 통(26), pp.213~247 (2008), 안암법학회
- 김정회, "개정 화환신용장통일규칙(UCP 600)상 운송서류의 수리요건과 문제점에 관한 연구", 해운물류연구, (55), pp.145~173 (2007), 한국해운물류학회
- 김창준, "복합운송주선업자의 법적 지위에 관한 연구- 법해석론적 쟁점을 중심으로", 박사, pp.2004
- 이광후, "화주의 운송인 등에 대한 배상청구- 대법원 2007.4.27. 선고, 2007다4943 판결과 관련하여 -", 인권과 정의, (377), pp.216~231 (2008), 대한변호사협회
- 이균성, "운송주선인의 해상운송인으로서의 지위취득. in: 민사판례연구(Ⅺ)" (1991), 박영사
- 임동철, "이른바 ‘Freight Forwarder’의 지위와 책임에 관한 고찰", 한국해법회지, 10(1) (1988)
- 임동철, "재운송계약과 선박소유자의 책임 -운송책임의 주체와 관련하여-", 한국해법회지, 15(1) (1993), 한국해법학회
- 전현정, (2007), 법원도서관
- 채이식, "船舶所有者 및 海上運送人(艤裝者)의 槪念", 한국해법학회지, 24(1), pp.45~67 (2002), 한국해법학회
- 채이식, "해상운송주선인의 법률적 지위", 법학논집, 23 (1985), 고려대
- 최종현, "개정 해상법 하에서의 해상운송인의 지위 - 해상운송인의 손해배상책임제도를 중심으로 -", 한국해법학회지, 30(1), pp.49~83 (2008), 한국해법학회
- 천종호, "선박임차인의 법적 지위", 판례연구, 17 (2006), 부산판례연구회
- 한창희, "해상운송인의 지위", 법조, 43(11) (1994)
- Baughen, S., "Shipping Law, 3rd ed." (2004), Cavendish Publishing Ltd.
- D'Arcy, Leo, "Schmitthoff's Export Trade -The Law and Practice of International Trade-" (2000), Sweet and Maxwell
- Griggs, Patrick, "Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims, 4th ed." (2005), LLP
- Murray, C., "Schmitthoff's Export Trade ; The Law and Practice of International Trade, 11th ed." (2007), Sweet & Maxwell Ltd.
- Scrutton, "Scrutton on Charterparties and Bills of Lading" (1984), Sweet & Maxwell
- Todd, Paul, "Bills of Lading and Banker's Documentary Credits, 4th ed." (2007), Informa
