금융소비자보호법의 바람직한 제정 방향에 대한 고찰 -통합 금융분쟁조정원(가칭)의 설립을 제안하며-
A Study on Desirable Enactment of Financial Consumer Protection Act
0
조회
0
다운로드
40
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article deals and proposes a desirable enactment of ‘Financial Consumer Protection Act’ which is now under consideration by Financial Services Commission(FSC). The study, to begin with, clarifies the concept of ‘financial consumer’, and after reviewing various concepts and scope regarding to ‘financial consumer protection’, it circumscribes the concept and scope of ‘financial consumer protection’ within financial dispute resolution, financial education, and independent advice for financial products. It, especially, opposes to the so-called ‘Twin peaks model’ in which prudential regulation and business conduct regulation are separated. The main proposal of this paper is to establish a ‘Financial Dispute Resolution Institute’ which is in charge of the financial consumer protection tasks at current stage. The Institute, with being separated from Financial Supervisory Service, consolidates the present dispute resolution functions of Financial Supervisory Service, Korea Exchange, Korea Financial Investment Association, and Korea Consumer Agency. The study deals with three critical issues for the function of 'Financial Dispute Resolution Institute' and suggests that first, there be mandatory mediation before going to the court, second, one-side binding effect of mediation decision not be permitted, and last, independent financial advisory function be enhanced. The paper, in the latter section, reviews the FSC's plan for enactment of 'Financial Consumer Protection Act’ and makes some suggestions. First,'Suitability test’ is not appropriate for the loans of banks and Credit Specialized Financial Business Companies. Second, applying 'Adequacy test'to insurance products needs to be reconsidered. Finally, special damage presumption needs to be given to actions caused by violation of suitability test such as violation of duty to explain.
Abstract
This article deals and proposes a desirable enactment of ‘Financial Consumer Protection Act’ which is now under consideration by Financial Services Commission(FSC). The study, to begin with, clarifies the concept of ‘financial consumer’, and after reviewing various concepts and scope regarding to ‘financial consumer protection’, it circumscribes the concept and scope of ‘financial consumer protection’ within financial dispute resolution, financial education, and independent advice for financial products. It, especially, opposes to the so-called ‘Twin peaks model’ in which prudential regulation and business conduct regulation are separated. The main proposal of this paper is to establish a ‘Financial Dispute Resolution Institute’ which is in charge of the financial consumer protection tasks at current stage. The Institute, with being separated from Financial Supervisory Service, consolidates the present dispute resolution functions of Financial Supervisory Service, Korea Exchange, Korea Financial Investment Association, and Korea Consumer Agency. The study deals with three critical issues for the function of 'Financial Dispute Resolution Institute' and suggests that first, there be mandatory mediation before going to the court, second, one-side binding effect of mediation decision not be permitted, and last, independent financial advisory function be enhanced. The paper, in the latter section, reviews the FSC's plan for enactment of 'Financial Consumer Protection Act’ and makes some suggestions. First,'Suitability test’ is not appropriate for the loans of banks and Credit Specialized Financial Business Companies. Second, applying 'Adequacy test'to insurance products needs to be reconsidered. Finally, special damage presumption needs to be given to actions caused by violation of suitability test such as violation of duty to explain.
참고문헌 (33)
- 고동원, "금융분쟁조정 제도의 효율적 운영을 위한 개선 방안", 금융소비자학회 창립기념세미나 자료집 (2010)
- 고형석, "한국과 일본의 소비자분쟁조정제도에 관한 연구", 영남법학, (30), pp.373~410 (2010), 법학연구소
- 금융감독원, "2010 금융소비자보호 백서" (2011)
- 금융연구원, "최근 주요국의 금융교육 현황 및 보완과제", 주간금융브리프, 17(31) (2008)
- 권오승, "의료분쟁조정법안의 문제점과 개선방안", 법학, 36(1) (1995), 서울대학교
- 김건식, "증권거래법(제4판)" (2006), 두성사
- 김상조, "금융소비자 피해 사후구제 제도의 현황과 정책과제, In 금융소비자 보호: 현안과 정책과제", 2009년 하반기 정책 심포지엄 발표자료 (2009), 한국금융연구센터
- 김진영, "금융소비자의 변화 및 교육개선 방안학교교육을 중심으로", 금융소비자학회 창립기념세미나 자료집 (2010)
- 김철수, "헌법학개론, 제19전정신판" (2007), 박영사
- 로렌 윌리스, "Against Financial Literacy Education", 한국증권법학회·한일산업금융법포럼, 기업지배구조와 금융교육 특별세미나 (2010)
- 안수현, "(가칭)자본시장통합법과 소비자보호법의 접점 - ‘금융소비자의 보호’", 증권법연구, 7(2), pp.199~248 (2006), 한국증권법학회
- 안수현, "금융소비자 보호와 자본시장법의 과제", 기업법연구, 22(4), pp.73~122 (2008), 한국기업법학회
- 안수현, "법·제도·집행·분쟁 측면에서 본 금융소비자보호체제와 평가", 금융소비자학회 창립기념세미나 자료집 (2010)
- 연태훈, "금융소비자 역량 강화의 필요성과 정책제언", 주간금융브리프, 19(49) (2010), 금융연구원
- 보험분쟁의 재판외적 해결 활성화 방안금융분쟁조정제도를 중심으로, "오영수", 보험연구원, ~, pp.정책보고서 2009-3 (2009)
- 금융지식 역량 강화를 위한 효율적인 금융교육체제 구축방안 연구, "이남철", 한국직업능력개발원, ~ (2009)
- 대체적 분쟁해결제도에 관한 연구, "이상헌", 연세대 행정대학원, ~ (2005)
- 이순호, "금융지식교육(Financial Literacy Education)의 효과분석", 주간금융브리프, 18(49) (2009), 금융연구원
- 이택길, "금융분쟁조정 전치주의와 재판청구권" (2011), 법제처
- 정순섭, "금융규제개혁과 금융소비자 보호", 상사판례연구, 23(2), pp.3~67 (2010), 한국상사판례학회
- 최승재, "금융시장에서의 금융소비자의 행동양태를 고려한 투자자보호규범의 설계에 대한 연구 ―소위＂행동경제학＂적 관점을 반영하여", 증권법연구, 9(2), pp.227~270 (2008), 한국증권법학회
- 한국개발연구원, "금융소비자 보호에 관한 법률(가칭) 금융소비자보호 강화를 위한 기본방향 토론회" (2010)
- 한국소비자원, "2010 소비자 피해구제 연보 및 사례집" (2011)
- 건전한 증시질서구축을 위한 자율규제기관의 역할, "한국증권법학회", 한국증권거래소, ~ (2001)
- 홍종학, "약탈적 대출에 관한 소고", 한국경제학보, 12(1) (2005)
- Wolfgang Römer, "Außergerichtliche Streitbeilegung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland am Beispiel des Ombudsmanns für Versicherungen", 경영법률, 18(4), pp.239~268 (2008), 한국경영법률학회
- Aerdt Houben, "Towards an integrated supervisor: experiences from The Netherlands", ~ (2006)
- Review of cases by external appeal: after an ombudsman decision, "FSA", ~ (2004)
- Lauren E. Willis, "Against Financial Literacy Education", Iowa Law Review, 94, pp.197~ (2008)
- Lauren E. Willis, "Evidence and Ideology in Assessing the Effectiveness of Financial Literacy Education", San Diego Law Review, 46, pp.415~ (2009)
- Financial Consumer Protection and the Global Financial Crisis, "Martin Melecky", ~, pp.World Bank, MPRA Paper No. 28201 (2011)
- Michael S. Franczak, "The Model Employment Termination Act (META): Does It Violate The Right To Trial By Jury", Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 10, pp.441~ (1995)
- Michael W. Taylor, "The Road from ‘Twin Peaks’ And The Way Back", Connecticut Insurance Law Journal, 16, pp.61~ (2009)