개정상법에 따라 도입된 합자조합과 유한책임회사에 관한 연구 - 관련규정의 보완점과 제도도입에 대한 평가를 중심으로 -
A Study on Habja-johab (K-Limited Partnership: K-LP) and Yuhanchaekim-hoesa (K-Limited Liability Company: K-LLC) under the 2011 Revised Commercial Law
0
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The 2011 Revised Commercial Law of Korea introduced Habja-johab (hereinafter “K-LP”) and Yuhanchaekim-hoesa (hereinafter “K-LLC”) as the new forms of business organizations. Both entities were originally modelled after the US equivalents, i.e. the limited partnership and the limited liability company, respectively. Three main features have been requested for the new business entity to come. Firstly, more self-autonomy needs to be granted so that its members may have contractual discretion in (i)formulating internal organs, (ii) proceeding with the management, and (iii)distributing the profits and losses among them. Secondly, its members should only take limited liability against entity's creditors. Thirdly, the partnership taxation treatment should be applicable to allow (i) exemption from the double-taxation and (ii) direct attribution of the profits and losses incurred at the entity level to its members for tax purposes. However, K-LP and K-LLC, as enacted by the Revised Commercial Law, lack certain main features and thus require amendments to properly serve the purpose of their introduction and to enhance their usefulness. Additionally, the taxation regime is required to be amended so that the newly introduced business forms might be eligible for the partnership taxation. Apart from the foregoing, it should be noted that introducing K-LP and K-LLC as new business organizations into the Korean legal system has presented such a dilemma from a long term viewpoint. Since the existing Commercial Law of Korea had long been providing for Habja-hoesa and Yuhan-hoesa, which are very similar to K-LP and K-LLC, respectively, the Revised Commercial Law can not avoid the severe criticism of redundant legislation. Habja-hoesa and K-LP are analogous and should be converged in the long run. By the same token, Yuhan-hoesa and K-LLC must be combined into one. Each form of the business entity so combined, with the slight touch of amendments for more flexibility, will be a perfect tool for the small or medium sized business enterprises in the area of knowledge and human capital intensive “new industry” of Korea.
Abstract
The 2011 Revised Commercial Law of Korea introduced Habja-johab (hereinafter “K-LP”) and Yuhanchaekim-hoesa (hereinafter “K-LLC”) as the new forms of business organizations. Both entities were originally modelled after the US equivalents, i.e. the limited partnership and the limited liability company, respectively. Three main features have been requested for the new business entity to come. Firstly, more self-autonomy needs to be granted so that its members may have contractual discretion in (i)formulating internal organs, (ii) proceeding with the management, and (iii)distributing the profits and losses among them. Secondly, its members should only take limited liability against entity's creditors. Thirdly, the partnership taxation treatment should be applicable to allow (i) exemption from the double-taxation and (ii) direct attribution of the profits and losses incurred at the entity level to its members for tax purposes. However, K-LP and K-LLC, as enacted by the Revised Commercial Law, lack certain main features and thus require amendments to properly serve the purpose of their introduction and to enhance their usefulness. Additionally, the taxation regime is required to be amended so that the newly introduced business forms might be eligible for the partnership taxation. Apart from the foregoing, it should be noted that introducing K-LP and K-LLC as new business organizations into the Korean legal system has presented such a dilemma from a long term viewpoint. Since the existing Commercial Law of Korea had long been providing for Habja-hoesa and Yuhan-hoesa, which are very similar to K-LP and K-LLC, respectively, the Revised Commercial Law can not avoid the severe criticism of redundant legislation. Habja-hoesa and K-LP are analogous and should be converged in the long run. By the same token, Yuhan-hoesa and K-LLC must be combined into one. Each form of the business entity so combined, with the slight touch of amendments for more flexibility, will be a perfect tool for the small or medium sized business enterprises in the area of knowledge and human capital intensive “new industry” of Korea.
참고문헌 (43)
- 고재종, "유한책임회사(LLC)와 합자조합(LP)에 관한 법적 고찰", 이문논총, 26 (2006), 한국외국어대학교 대학원
- 김동석, "미국 유한책임회사(LLC)의 특징과 설립", 상사법연구, 20(3) (2001), 한국상사법학회
- 김병연, "개정 신탁법(안)이 은행 신탁영업에 미치는 영향과 시사점", 한국금융연구원 (2011)
- 김재문, "새로운 기업형태의 도입에 관한 상법개정안에 대한 소고", 경영법률, 18(1), pp.201~228 (2007), 한국경영법률학회
- 김태진, "기업형태로서의 신탁 -사업신탁, 수익증권발행신탁 및 유한책임신탁을 중심으로", 법학논총, 31(2), pp.119~151 (2011), 전남대학교 법학연구소
- 김태진, "유한책임신탁에 대한 검토와 신탁법 개정을 위한 시사점", 중앙법학, 11(3), pp.297~328 (2009), 중앙법학회
- 김형배, "민법학강의 제3판" (2003), 신조사
- 노혁준, "우리나라와 일본의 새로운 공동기업 형태의 비교 검토", BFL, (32) (2008), 서울대학교 금융법센터
- 박세화, "미국 유한책임회사의 특성에 관한 연구", 연세법학연구, 8(2) (2002), 연세법학회
- 박승재, "기업형태의 선택과 법형식 중립적 과세원칙에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2009
- 박훈, "새로운 기업조직과 과세", BFL, (32) (2008), 서울대학교 금융법센터
- 법무부, "상법 회사편 일부개정법률(안) 입법예고", 법무부공고 제2008-47호, ~
- 서성호, "日本의 (新)會社法上 持分會社制度에 관한 硏究 - (新)會社法 要點整理 및 合同會社制度導入 可能性을 중심으로 -", 기업법연구, 23(1), pp.169~190 (2009), 한국기업법학회
- 서완석, "합자회사 형태를 취하는 사모투자전문회사의 법적 문제점", 외법논집, (31), pp.509~550 (2008), 한국외국어대학교 법학연구소
- 안경봉, "합자조합(LP), 유한책임회사(LLC)의 도입과 법적 문제점", 상사법연구, 25(4), pp.147~183 (2007), 한국상사법학회
- 상법개정에 따른 세제개편방안(재정경제부 보고서), "안경봉", 한국경제연구학회, ~ (2008)
- 안성포, "민법상 조합의 권리능력과 당사자능력 ― 2001년 1월 29일 독일연방법원의 변경된 판결을 중심으로 ―", 비교사법, 10(3), pp.285~314 (2003), 한국비교사법학회
- 안성포, "신탁법의 개정방향 -법무부 2009년 신탁법 전면개정안을 중심으로 -", 법학연구, 51(1), pp.193~235 (2010), 법학연구소
- 파트너십 과세제도 도입방안, "안종석", 한국조세연구원, ~ (2007)
- 윤성승, "사모투자펀드와 관련한 상법상 합자회사와 미국의 Limited Partnership의 비교연구", 한림법학, 16 (2005), 한림대학교 법학연구소
- 이동헌, "동업기업 과세제도의개선에 관한 연구 - 조세전문가의 인식을 중심으로 -", 회계정보연구, 28(4), pp.131~164 (2010), 한국회계정보학회
- 이준규, "조세특례제한법상 동업기업 과세특례제도의타당성에 관한 연구", 조세법연구, 14(1), pp.51~98 (2008), 한국세법학회
- 이창희, "독일법상 인적회사와 조합의 과세", 조세학술논문집, 19 (2003)
- 이철송, "회사법강의 제11판" (2004), 박영사
- 장현진, "유한책임회사의 구조에 관한 비교법적 연구", 박사, pp.2009
- 재정경제부 TF팀, "파트너십 과세제도 TF 논의결과", 파트너십 과세제도에 관한 정책토론회 (2007), 한국조세연구원
- 정대익, "상법개정안상 새로운 기업유형에 대한 검토", 상사법연구, 28(3), pp.75~126 (2009), 한국상사법학회
- 정동윤, "회사법 제7판" (2001), 법문사
- 정찬형, "상법강의(상)(제14판)" (2011), 박영사
- 한국에서 폐쇄적인 중소기업에 적합한 회사형태의 모색-Limited Liability Company와 주식회사로서의 폐쇄회사를 중심으로-, "조인호", ~, pp.KDI 연구보고서 2005-05
- 2009년도 중소기업에 관한 연차보고서, "중소기업청", ~ (2009)
- 최기원, "상법학신론(상)제19판" (2011), 박영사
- 최완진, "상법학강의" (2005), 법문사
- 상법개정연구보고서, "한국증권법학회", 한국증권법학회, ~ (2006)
- Daniel S. Kleinberger, "Agency, Partnerships, and LLCs, 2nd Ed" (2002), Aspen Publishers
- Edward J. Buchholz, "Substantiality under Section 704(b) - Some Forgotten Issues and Some Ancient Concepts Revisited", Virginia Tax Review, 19 (1999)
- Edward J. Schee, "Section 704(b) Final Regulations and the Tax-Shelter Investment: A Review", Cumberland Law Review, 17 (1986)
- Heather M. Field, "Checking in on Check-the-Box", Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 42 (2009)
- Robert W. Hamilton, "The Law of Corporations in a Nutshell, 5th Ed" (2000), West Group
- Steven A. Dean, "Tax Deregulation", New York University Law Review, 86 (2011)
- Ulrich Seibert, "Close Corporations-Reforming Private Company Law: European and International Perspectives", European Business Organization Law Review, 8 (2007)
- 關口智弘, "合同會社や有限責任事業組合の實務上の利用例と問題點", 法律時報, 80(11)
- 日本 法務省, "登記統計 統計表", 商業·法人から, ~ (2010)