본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

합자조합(LP), 유한책임회사(LLC)의 도입과 법적 문제점

Legal Problems on the Introduction of Limited Partnerships and Limited Liability Corporations into Commercial Code

0

조회

0

다운로드

31

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

The Ministry of Justice tries to introduce Limited Partnerships(in Korean Hapja Johap) and Limited Liability Corporations(in Korean Yuhanchaikim Hoisa) into the Commercial Code. Hapja Johap originates from Limited Partnerships in U.S. and a Yuugensekininzigiyou Kumiai(有限責任事業組合) in Japan and a Yuhanchaikim Hoisa originates from Limited Liability Corporations in U.S. and a Goudou Kaishya(合同會社) in Japan. In U.S. the “check-the-box” regulations, issued in 1996, simplify and liberalize the entity classification. Under this elective regime, most newly-formed domestic unincorporated business entities will automatically be classified as partnerships unless they elect to be treated as associations taxable as corporations. Thus the Limited Partnerships is indistinguishable from the Limited Liability Corporations in double-tax and passthrough treatment. But the Korean tax laws seek to distinguish a Johap from an association taxable as a corporation based on a “legal personality” test. Thus a Yuhanchaikim Hoisa will be taxable as a corporation. Yuhanchaikim Hoisa will not be different from a Private Company(有限會社) in Commercial Code, except that it will be managed by the articles of incorporations decided between members. If so, what is the practical benefit to introduce Yuhanchaikim Hoisa into Commercial Code? To vitalize the Hapja Johap and Yuhanchaikim Hoisa, it needs to discuss the introduction of the elective partnership taxation regime into Korean tax laws.

Abstract

The Ministry of Justice tries to introduce Limited Partnerships(in Korean Hapja Johap) and Limited Liability Corporations(in Korean Yuhanchaikim Hoisa) into the Commercial Code. Hapja Johap originates from Limited Partnerships in U.S. and a Yuugensekininzigiyou Kumiai(有限責任事業組合) in Japan and a Yuhanchaikim Hoisa originates from Limited Liability Corporations in U.S. and a Goudou Kaishya(合同會社) in Japan. In U.S. the “check-the-box” regulations, issued in 1996, simplify and liberalize the entity classification. Under this elective regime, most newly-formed domestic unincorporated business entities will automatically be classified as partnerships unless they elect to be treated as associations taxable as corporations. Thus the Limited Partnerships is indistinguishable from the Limited Liability Corporations in double-tax and passthrough treatment. But the Korean tax laws seek to distinguish a Johap from an association taxable as a corporation based on a “legal personality” test. Thus a Yuhanchaikim Hoisa will be taxable as a corporation. Yuhanchaikim Hoisa will not be different from a Private Company(有限會社) in Commercial Code, except that it will be managed by the articles of incorporations decided between members. If so, what is the practical benefit to introduce Yuhanchaikim Hoisa into Commercial Code? To vitalize the Hapja Johap and Yuhanchaikim Hoisa, it needs to discuss the introduction of the elective partnership taxation regime into Korean tax laws.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. 김재문, "로펌의 企業形態에 관한 法的 考察", 22(1) (2003)
  2. 송종준, "회사법상 회계관련규정의 개정 및 새로운 제도의 도입", 25(2) (2006)
  3. 안경봉, "법무시장개방과 조세", (06-04) (2006), 한국조세연구원 세법연구센터
  4. 옥무석, "회사법제의 개정논의가 법인세법상 납세 단위논의에 미치는 시사점", (06-02) (2006), 한국세법학회
  5. 윤성승, "Private Equity Fund의 본질과 법적 문제점", 금융법연구, 2(1), pp.3~40 (2005), 한국금융법학회
  6. 윤현석, "새로운 기업유형의 도입에 관한 연구", 23(1) (2004)
  7. 윤희웅, "사모투자전문회사의 합자회사 형태에 따른 법적 문제점", (10) (2005)
  8. 이은미, "조합의 과세에 관한 연구" (2007)
  9. 이정수, "미국의 LLC, LLP제도의 도입과 세법적 대응", (06-02) (2006), 한국세법학회
  10. 조인호, "한국에서 폐쇄적인 중소기업에 적합한 회사형태의 모색:Limited Liability Company와 주식회사로서의 폐쇄회사를 중심으로" (2005), 한국개발연구원
  11. 한국증권법학회, "상법개정연구보고서" (2006), 한국증권법학회
  12. 황인경, "인적회사의 과세방안―파트너십 방식과 S corporation 방식의비교검토를 통한 입법안―", 조세법연구, 11(1), pp.104~155 (2005), 한국세법학회
  13. 根田正樹, "合同會社·LLPの法務と稅務" (2005), 學陽書房
  14. 川田 剛, "LLP·LLCの理論と稅務" (2005), 財經詳報社
  15. ?戶善一, "總則·合名合資會社·LLC", (1632) (2002)
  16. 增井良啓, "組織形態の多樣化と所得課稅", 30 (2002)
  17. 增井良啓, "多樣な事業組織をめぐる稅制上の問題點" (2003), 財務省財務總合政策硏究所
  18. Hamilton, Robert W, "Registered Limited Liability Partnerships: Present at the Birth (Nearly)", 66, pp.1065~ (1995)
  19. Klein, Ramseyer & Bainbridge, "Business Associations - Cases and Materials on Agency, Partnerships, and Corporations" (2003), Foundation Press
  20. Shade & Epstein, "Business Structure" (2003), Thomson West
  21. Whittaker & Machell, "The law of Limited Liability Partnerships" (2004), Jordans
  22. "http:", policy, pp.economic_oganization, llp_seido.html

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)