본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

상법상 외국회사 규정의 몇 가지 문제점: 2011년개정의 분석과 비판을 겸하여

A Few Issues on Treatment of Foreign Corporations under the Korean Commercial Code: Analyses and Critiques of 2011 Amendment

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Provisions relating to the foreign corporations in the Korean CommercialCode were amended in 2011. This paper identifies important issues that maypractically arise with respect to these provisions and tries to presentreasonable ways to interpret and apply these provisions. Also, this paperpoints out a few mistakes in the amendment and proposes ways toovercome such problems. More specifically, this paper focuses on three major issues. First, theArticle 614 should be further revised to require registration with the courteven when the foreign corporation does not establish a branch in Koreaand simply designates its representatives (at least one of whom must residein Korea). Such proposal may appear to increase the burden of foreigncorporations, but in fact it will remove the undue obligation of a foreigncorporation under the Article 616 to be registered with the court (whichregistration is currently only possible when it establishes a branch office) inorder to be “engaged in continuing transactions.”Second, a foreign corporation registered with the court in Korea isrequired to disclose its balance sheet or its equivalent under the new Article616-2. This paper argues that such obligations cannot require more than itslaw of incorporation requires. Thus, if a standalone balance sheet (asopposed to a consolidated one) is not required under its law ofincorporation, the company does not need to prepare and disclose it inKorea (and it is sufficient to disclose a consolidated balance sheet), althoughKorean law so requires to the Korean companies. Third, this paper criticizes the overreaching pseudo-foreign corporationdoctrine adopted by the Article 617 and proposes abolishment or a verylimited application of this provision. Parties who entered into transactionswith such pseudo-foreign corporation should not be harmed by disregardingdue incorporation of such companies.

Abstract

Provisions relating to the foreign corporations in the Korean CommercialCode were amended in 2011. This paper identifies important issues that maypractically arise with respect to these provisions and tries to presentreasonable ways to interpret and apply these provisions. Also, this paperpoints out a few mistakes in the amendment and proposes ways toovercome such problems. More specifically, this paper focuses on three major issues. First, theArticle 614 should be further revised to require registration with the courteven when the foreign corporation does not establish a branch in Koreaand simply designates its representatives (at least one of whom must residein Korea). Such proposal may appear to increase the burden of foreigncorporations, but in fact it will remove the undue obligation of a foreigncorporation under the Article 616 to be registered with the court (whichregistration is currently only possible when it establishes a branch office) inorder to be “engaged in continuing transactions.”Second, a foreign corporation registered with the court in Korea isrequired to disclose its balance sheet or its equivalent under the new Article616-2. This paper argues that such obligations cannot require more than itslaw of incorporation requires. Thus, if a standalone balance sheet (asopposed to a consolidated one) is not required under its law ofincorporation, the company does not need to prepare and disclose it inKorea (and it is sufficient to disclose a consolidated balance sheet), althoughKorean law so requires to the Korean companies. Third, this paper criticizes the overreaching pseudo-foreign corporationdoctrine adopted by the Article 617 and proposes abolishment or a verylimited application of this provision. Parties who entered into transactionswith such pseudo-foreign corporation should not be harmed by disregardingdue incorporation of such companies.

참고문헌 (32)

  1. 권기범, "현대회사법론" (2012), 삼영사
  2. 권남혁, "재판자료 제38집" (1987)
  3. 김동훈, "회사법" (2010), 한국외국어대출판부
  4. 김연미, "상법상 외국회사의 지위", BFL, (42) (2010), 서울대학교 금융법센터
  5. "상법개정특별분과위원회 회의록(회사편)", 법무부, ~ (2006)
  6. 서돈각, "상법강의(상)" (1999), 법문사
  7. 석광현, (2001), 박영사
  8. 석광현, "국제사법해설" (2013), 박영사
  9. 손진화, "상법강의" (2011), 신조사
  10. 손주찬, "상법(상)" (2003), 박영사
  11. 양명조, "회사법" (2012), 法文社
  12. 최병규, "회사법" (2011), 박영사
  13. 이철송, "회사법강의" (2013), 박영사
  14. 임재연, "회사법I" (2013), 박영사
  15. 임홍근, "회사법" (2002), 법문사
  16. 전계원, "비송-상업등기 문답(13)", 사법행정, 49(3) (2008), 한국사법행정학회
  17. 정동윤, "상법(상)" (2012), 법문사
  18. 정동윤, "주석상법 회사IV" (2003), 한국사법행정학회
  19. 정성숙, "유럽회사법의 발전동향 - 영업소의 설치ㆍ이전의 자유와 회사조직형식을 중심으로 -", 비교사법, 14(1), pp.445~470 (2007), 한국비교사법학회
  20. 정찬형, "상법강의(상)(제15판)" (2012), 박영사
  21. 정희철, "상법학원론(상)" (1987), 박영사
  22. 최기원, "신회사법론" (2012), 박영사
  23. 최준선, "회사법 제7판" (2012), 삼영사
  24. 김연미, "주식회사법대계 III" (2013), 한국상사법학회
  25. 上柳克郞, "新版 注釋會社法(13)" (1990), 有斐閣
  26. 江頭憲治郞, "株式會社法" (2011), 有斐閣
  27. 江頭憲治郞, "會社法大系 1" (2008), 靑林書院
  28. 江頭憲治郞, "論点體系 會社法 6", pp.79~ (2012), 第一法規
  29. 早川吉尙, "擬似外國會社", ジュリスト, (1267) (2004)
  30. 藤田友敬, "擬似外國會社", ジュリスト 別冊(國際私法判例百選), (210) (2012)
  31. Erin A. O’Hara, "Larry E. Ribstein" (2009), The Law Market
  32. Roberta Romano, "The Genius of American Corporate Law" (1993), The AEI Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)