본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

주식의 전자등록제도에 있어서 주주 보호 방안

The protection of shareholders under the electronic registration system

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

The system of electronic registered shares was newly introduced in the Korean Commercial Law in 2011(hereinafter referred to as the “KCL”). But the KCL does not provide provision of the electronic registration procedure, effect, etc. We need to establish a special Act(rule), so recently, member of Parliament Jong-kul Lee has proposed a “Act on Book-Entry of Securities, etc. in 2014”(hereinafter referred to as the “Lee Act”). I would like to compare Lee Act and “Act on book-Entry of Company bonds, shares, etc in Japan(hereinafter referred to as the JA).” Lee Act adopted two-tire, but the JA adopted multi-tire on the system of the Book-Entry transfer institution. Shareholder can register directly the institution or indirectly account management institution in Lee Act, but shareholder should only register indirectly account management institution in JA. However, new registration procedures for electronic registration, the enforcement of shareholder rights, such as the pledge of the Book-Entry Transfer Shares is similar. The ownership of the rights of the share in a company, which does not have a provision on the issuance of the share certificate in its articles of incorporation, shall be determined by the description or record in the book-entry transfer account registry. However, this shall not apply in cases where there has been a “Special Account” that said company has requested be opened on behalf of said shareholder or registered pledgee. The transfer of the Book-Entry Transfer Shares shall not take effect, unless the assignee has had the increase in the number of said Book-Entry Transfer Shares to be transferred described or recorded in the Ownership Column of the assignee's account. In other words, the investor shall be presumed to be the lawful owner of the rights to the Book-Entry Transfer Shares described or recorded in his/her own account. With regard to the Book-Entry Transfer Shares that have been described or recorded in the Special Account, the Participant may not apply for the book-entry transfer to the transferee account except to the account of said Participant or to the account of the issuer of said Book-Entry Transfer Shares. The Book-Entry Transfer Institution shall promptly notify the issuer of the shareholder's name and address, the Issue. it is said that notice of all shareholders. In this case, each of those matters shall be deemed to be described or recorded pursuant to the provisions of the record date of the KCL. The provisions of record date of the KCL shall not apply to the exercise of the minority shareholders' right, etc. in respect of the Book-Entry Transfer Shares. With respect to the Book-Entry Transfer Shares, the minority shareholders' right, etc. may be exercised after it is proposed the owner certificate or the notice individual shareholder. It needs to make a description or record in the Ownership Column or Pledge Column of the investor. Informally pledge can be described by Pledge column. The pledge of the Book-Entry Transfer Shares shall not take effect, unless the pledgee has had the increase in the number pertaining to the pledge described or recorded in the Pledge Column of the pledgee's account through application for the book-entry transfer. When the investor (including a Book-Entry Transfer Institution with an Institution Account) has had an increase in the number of the Book-Entry Transfer Shares of a particular Issue described or recorded in its account through application for the book-entry transfer (limited to the Institution's Own Account, if held by the Account Management Institution), the investor shall acquire the rights pertaining to said description or record of the increase in the number in the Book-Entry Transfer Shares of said Issue; provided, however that this shall not apply if said investor has acted in bad faith or with gross negligence. It proposes to introduce a compensation fund to protect the good faith purchaser like participants protection trust contract in JA.

Abstract

The system of electronic registered shares was newly introduced in the Korean Commercial Law in 2011(hereinafter referred to as the “KCL”). But the KCL does not provide provision of the electronic registration procedure, effect, etc. We need to establish a special Act(rule), so recently, member of Parliament Jong-kul Lee has proposed a “Act on Book-Entry of Securities, etc. in 2014”(hereinafter referred to as the “Lee Act”). I would like to compare Lee Act and “Act on book-Entry of Company bonds, shares, etc in Japan(hereinafter referred to as the JA).” Lee Act adopted two-tire, but the JA adopted multi-tire on the system of the Book-Entry transfer institution. Shareholder can register directly the institution or indirectly account management institution in Lee Act, but shareholder should only register indirectly account management institution in JA. However, new registration procedures for electronic registration, the enforcement of shareholder rights, such as the pledge of the Book-Entry Transfer Shares is similar. The ownership of the rights of the share in a company, which does not have a provision on the issuance of the share certificate in its articles of incorporation, shall be determined by the description or record in the book-entry transfer account registry. However, this shall not apply in cases where there has been a “Special Account” that said company has requested be opened on behalf of said shareholder or registered pledgee. The transfer of the Book-Entry Transfer Shares shall not take effect, unless the assignee has had the increase in the number of said Book-Entry Transfer Shares to be transferred described or recorded in the Ownership Column of the assignee's account. In other words, the investor shall be presumed to be the lawful owner of the rights to the Book-Entry Transfer Shares described or recorded in his/her own account. With regard to the Book-Entry Transfer Shares that have been described or recorded in the Special Account, the Participant may not apply for the book-entry transfer to the transferee account except to the account of said Participant or to the account of the issuer of said Book-Entry Transfer Shares. The Book-Entry Transfer Institution shall promptly notify the issuer of the shareholder's name and address, the Issue. it is said that notice of all shareholders. In this case, each of those matters shall be deemed to be described or recorded pursuant to the provisions of the record date of the KCL. The provisions of record date of the KCL shall not apply to the exercise of the minority shareholders' right, etc. in respect of the Book-Entry Transfer Shares. With respect to the Book-Entry Transfer Shares, the minority shareholders' right, etc. may be exercised after it is proposed the owner certificate or the notice individual shareholder. It needs to make a description or record in the Ownership Column or Pledge Column of the investor. Informally pledge can be described by Pledge column. The pledge of the Book-Entry Transfer Shares shall not take effect, unless the pledgee has had the increase in the number pertaining to the pledge described or recorded in the Pledge Column of the pledgee's account through application for the book-entry transfer. When the investor (including a Book-Entry Transfer Institution with an Institution Account) has had an increase in the number of the Book-Entry Transfer Shares of a particular Issue described or recorded in its account through application for the book-entry transfer (limited to the Institution's Own Account, if held by the Account Management Institution), the investor shall acquire the rights pertaining to said description or record of the increase in the number in the Book-Entry Transfer Shares of said Issue; provided, however that this shall not apply if said investor has acted in bad faith or with gross negligence. It proposes to introduce a compensation fund to protect the good faith purchaser like participants protection trust contract in JA.

참고문헌 (38)

  1. 정찬형, "전자증권제도의 도입에 따른 법적 과제", 상사법연구, 22(3) (2003), 한국상사법학회
  2. 박철영, "전자증권제도와 주식의 담보", 금융·증권법제의 최근 과제와 전망(2015년 한국경영법률학회 정기총회 및 동계공동학술대회) (2015), 한국경영법률학회
  3. 심인숙, "주식 및 사채의 전자등록제 도입에 관한 상법개정안 고찰", 상사법연구, 28(3), pp.215~248 (2009), 한국상사법학회
  4. 정경영, "전자증권의 법적 성질과 전자등록제도에 관한 고찰", 상사법연구, 22(3) (2003), 한국상사법학회
  5. 김순석, "주식 등의 전자등록제도 도입에 따른 주주 보호 방안", 상사법연구, 22(3) (2003), 한국상사법학회
  6. 손진화, "주식 등의 전자등록제도의 도입방안", 상사법연구, 22(3) (2003), 한국상사법학회
  7. 김재범, "2007년 상법개정안의 주식 전자등록제도", IT와 法硏究, 2 (2008), 경북대학교 법학연구소
  8. 안성포, "電子登錄制度의 導入을 위한 立法論的 考察-日本의 私債ㆍ株式등 代替法을 中心으로-", 중앙법학, 7(2), pp.223~256 (2005), 중앙법학회
  9. 안성포, "일본의 주권불발행제도에 관한 고찰", 상사법연구, 24(2) (2005), 한국상사법학회
  10. 정승화, "전자금융의 법적 과제(Ⅰ): 전자유가증권을 중심으로" (2002), 한국법제연구원
  11. 허항진, "일본의 주권전자화제도와 주요 실무적 쟁점에 관한 고찰", 비교사법, 17(1), pp.347~390 (2010), 한국비교사법학회
  12. 금융소비자 피해구제기금의 도입방안, "안수현", 금감원, ~ (2013)
  13. EU의 금융소비자 보호제도-현황 및 시사점, "하홍윤", 금보험공사 금융분석부, ~ (2007)
  14. 전자증권제도 법제화 방안, "서울대학교 금융법센터", ~ (2014)
  15. Russell A. Hakes, "UCC Article 8: Will the Indirect Holding of Securities Survive the Light of Day?", Loy. L. A. L. Rev, 35, pp.661~ (2002)
  16. 江頭憲治郞, "株式會社法" (2014), 有斐閣
  17. 江頭憲治郞, "株券不發行制度·電子公告制度の導入に關する要綱の解說(上)", 商事法務 No. 1675, ~ (2003)
  18. 始關正光, "電子公告制度·株券等不發行制度の導入(Ⅰ)", 商事法務 No. 1705, ~ (2004)
  19. 始關正光, "電子公告制度·株券等不發行制度の導入(Ⅱ)", 商事法務 No. 1707, ~ (2004)
  20. 始關正光, "電子公告制度·株券等不發行制度の導入(Ⅲ)", 商事法務 No. 1708, ~ (2004)
  21. 始關正光, "電子公告制度·株券等不發行制度の導入(Ⅳ)", 商事法務 No. 1709, ~ (2004)
  22. 始關正光, "電子公告制度·株券等不發行制度の導入(Ⅴ)", 商事法務 No. 1711, ~ (2004)
  23. コーエンズ久美子, "國際取引法硏究の最前線-第14回 證券振替制度における擔保權", 國際商事法務, 41(9) (2013)
  24. 法務省民事局參事官室, "株券不發行制度及び電子公告制度の導入に關する要綱中間試案の補足說明", 商事法務 No. 1660, ~ (2003)
  25. 小林英治, "振替債の取引における法的諸問題の檢討", 金融法務事情 No. 1848, ~ (2008)
  26. 大野晃宏ほか, "株券電子化開始後の解釋上の諸問題", 商事法務 No. 1873, 商事法務硏究會, ~ (2008)
  27. 西村欣也, "少數株主權等の行使と個別株主通知の實施時期", 判例タイムズ No. 1387, ~ (2013)
  28. 吉本健一, "振替株式についての會社法172條1項に基づく價格決定の申立てと個別株主通知の要否", 金融·商事判例 No. 1373, ~ (2011)
  29. 吉本健一, "振替株式に係る株主提案權の行使と個別株主通知の期限", 金融·商事判例 No. 1430, ~ (2013)
  30. 中川雅博, "振替制度における「個別株主通知」の實務", 阪法, 62(3·4) (2012)
  31. 浜口厚子, "少數株主權等の行使に關する振替法上の諸問題", 商事法務 No. 1897, 有斐閣, ~ (2010)
  32. 島田志帆, "振替株式の權利行使方法と今後の課題-近年の最高裁決定を中心として-", 立命館法學, (338) (2011), 立命館大學
  33. 小館浩樹, "振替株式發行會社による株主情報の取得", 商事法務 No. 1843, ~ (2008)
  34. 志谷匡史, "社債等振替法154條3項所定の通知の要否", 民商法雜誌, 144(6) (2011)
  35. 伊藤靖史, "振替制度と株主名簿に關する課題", 法律時報, 84(4) (2012)
  36. 東京地方裁判所商事硏究會, "類型別會社非訟" (2009), 判例タイムズ社
  37. 葉正匡美, "株券電子化ガイドブック(實務編)" (2009), 商事法務
  38. 山下友信ほか, "<座談會> 株券不發行制度に關する論点と對應", 株券不發行制度·電子公告制度, (286) (2005)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)