본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

상법과 회사법의 분리입법에 관한 소고

A Brief Study on Legislative Separation of Company Act from Commercial Code

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Since the beginning of the twenty one century, legislative races to reforming the company law have been speeded up in the international dimension. For example, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act was enacted in the U.S in 2002, individual European member country's domestic Company Acts have been revised in all of the countries since 2006, and also Japanese Commercial Code had been revised since the middle of '90s and its Company Act was firstly enacted in 2005 as an independent code from the conventional integrated Commercial Code. Such global reforming movements were carried out under the so-called "modernization of Company Act". In Korea, the commercial code was also being revised in accordance with the global trends since 1998 and was drastically reformed focusing on the company act in 2011. Such reforms of company act can be referred to as "globalization of contents", but are remote from the "globalization of Code" as an internationally general standard. It means that Korean Commercial Code has a new assignment to accept the international trends of "Globalization of the Code". In this paper, types of international legislature were classified according to the legal origins in relation to separation of company act from the Commercial or Civil Code, the reasons why the separation of company act is required were analysed in the comparative legal points and some plausible recommendations to be taken into consideration for the separation of company act in the future were suggested. In conclusion, positive co-operation among the concerned authorities having enforcing control over the general and special company acts is especially required for a success, "legislative separation of Company Act from the Commercial Code", because such a task is closely concerned with the establishment of national social and economic infrastructure.

Abstract

Since the beginning of the twenty one century, legislative races to reforming the company law have been speeded up in the international dimension. For example, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act was enacted in the U.S in 2002, individual European member country's domestic Company Acts have been revised in all of the countries since 2006, and also Japanese Commercial Code had been revised since the middle of '90s and its Company Act was firstly enacted in 2005 as an independent code from the conventional integrated Commercial Code. Such global reforming movements were carried out under the so-called "modernization of Company Act". In Korea, the commercial code was also being revised in accordance with the global trends since 1998 and was drastically reformed focusing on the company act in 2011. Such reforms of company act can be referred to as "globalization of contents", but are remote from the "globalization of Code" as an internationally general standard. It means that Korean Commercial Code has a new assignment to accept the international trends of "Globalization of the Code". In this paper, types of international legislature were classified according to the legal origins in relation to separation of company act from the Commercial or Civil Code, the reasons why the separation of company act is required were analysed in the comparative legal points and some plausible recommendations to be taken into consideration for the separation of company act in the future were suggested. In conclusion, positive co-operation among the concerned authorities having enforcing control over the general and special company acts is especially required for a success, "legislative separation of Company Act from the Commercial Code", because such a task is closely concerned with the establishment of national social and economic infrastructure.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. 강영기, "공개회사법의 입법추진을 둘러싼 일본의 최근동향에 관한 고찰", 법학논총, 33(2), pp.797~822 (2009), 법학연구소
  2. 권재열, "미국 델라웨어 주회사법의 최근 개정동향", 상사법연구, 31(1), pp.189~220 (2012), 한국상사법학회[DOI]
  3. 권종호, "일본 상사법의 개별입법화 동향", 기업법연구, 23(4), pp.169~192 (2009), 한국기업법학회
  4. 김순석, "미국 상사법의 개별입법화 동향", 기업법연구, 23(4), pp.41~73 (2009), 한국기업법학회
  5. 김은경, "독일의 2012년 개정 주식법에 관한 소고", 상사법연구, 31(1), pp.221~249 (2012), 한국상사법학회[DOI]
  6. , 2006
  7. 송종준, "주식회사 법정자본제도의 국제적 개혁동향과 입법 과제 - 주주와 채권자의 이해조정을 중심으로 -", 경영법률, 20(1), pp.171~204 (2009), 한국경영법률학회
  8. 심영, "영국 상사법의 개별입법화 동향", 기업법연구, 23(4), pp.9~39 (2009), 한국기업법학회
  9. 원용수, "프랑스 상사법의 개별입법화 동향 - 프랑스 상법의 편별 개별 입법화 현황과 시사점을 중심으로 -", 기업법연구, 23(4), pp.119~167 (2009), 한국기업법학회
  10. 이철송, "上場會社를 위한 會社法的 特例의 體系的 改善에 관한 提言", 상사법연구, 31(2), pp.9~26 (2012), 한국상사법학회
  11. 임홍근, "한국상법전 50년사" (2013), 법문사
  12. 정동윤, (2015), 한국사법행정학회
  13. 정동윤, "現代 會社法의 動向과 課題", 상사법연구, 29(2), pp.9~27 (2010), 한국상사법학회
  14. 최병규, "독일의 유한회사법 개정안(MoMiG법안)과 시사점", 비교사법, 13(4), pp.545~586 (2006), 한국비교사법학회
  15. 최준선, "한국과 일본의 미국 회사법 계수 과정에 관하여", 저스티스, (111), pp.121~139 (2009), 한국법학원
  16. 최준선, "회사법의 방향-취임사에 갈음하기 위하여", 상사법연구, 31(1), pp.9~35 (2012), 한국상사법학회[DOI]
  17. D. Bureau, "Le nouveau code de commerce? Une mystification" (2001), Recueil Dalloz
  18. Luca Enriques, "EC Reforms of Corporate Governance and Capital Markets Law : Do They Tackle Insiders’ Opportunism?", Nw. J. Int'l L. & Bus, 28(1) (2007)
  19. Mads Andenas, "European Comparative Company Law" (2009), Cambridge
  20. P. Le Cannu, "Droit des sociétés" (2012), Montchrestien
  21. P. Merle, "Droit des Sociétés commercmles" (2015), Précis
  22. 江頭憲治郞, "新會社法の制定", pp.1~15 (2005), 有斐閣
  23. 上村達男, "會社法 改革-公開株式會社法の構想" (2002), 岩波書店
  24. 相澤 哲, "立案擔當者による新·會社法の解說" (2005), (株)商事法務

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)