상법상 물적분할제도의 쟁점 및 입법적 개선방안
Legal Issues on Corporate Hive Down and Legislative Proposal
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article is originated from the critical mind that the article 530-12 of Commercial Code of Korea(hereinafter, ‘CCK’) is unclear in its contents because it is regulating the corporate hive-down by entire citing the articles of corporate division. To improve the foregoing article, author reviewed the legislation of hive-down by major countries. And as the next step the author examined the interpretative and legislative issues on hive-down. They go as follows: First, the article regulates literally that hive-down by acquisition is not allowed. Hence the active transactions are hindered. Second, if hive-down by acquisition were to be regulated in the article, the inspection procedure for the contribution in kind should be skipped. Third, regarding the creditor protection procedure there is an assertion that the procedure should be skipped in hive-down by the simple formation of new company. But the author concludes that the procedure is needed in every form of hive-down. Fourth, current CCK denies the appraisal right by a shareholders on hive-down by the simple formation of new company. However such a transaction has crucial meaning on shareholders as the merger and hive-down by acquisition have. Therefore the appraisal right should be granted on such a transaction. Also the author suggests the legislative proposal which reflects on the foregoing issues.
Abstract
This article is originated from the critical mind that the article 530-12 of Commercial Code of Korea(hereinafter, ‘CCK’) is unclear in its contents because it is regulating the corporate hive-down by entire citing the articles of corporate division. To improve the foregoing article, author reviewed the legislation of hive-down by major countries. And as the next step the author examined the interpretative and legislative issues on hive-down. They go as follows: First, the article regulates literally that hive-down by acquisition is not allowed. Hence the active transactions are hindered. Second, if hive-down by acquisition were to be regulated in the article, the inspection procedure for the contribution in kind should be skipped. Third, regarding the creditor protection procedure there is an assertion that the procedure should be skipped in hive-down by the simple formation of new company. But the author concludes that the procedure is needed in every form of hive-down. Fourth, current CCK denies the appraisal right by a shareholders on hive-down by the simple formation of new company. However such a transaction has crucial meaning on shareholders as the merger and hive-down by acquisition have. Therefore the appraisal right should be granted on such a transaction. Also the author suggests the legislative proposal which reflects on the foregoing issues.
참고문헌 (25)
- 권기범, "물적분할", 서울법학, 17, pp.1~25 (2009), 서울시립대학교 법학연구소
- 권기범, "기업구조조정법" (2011), 삼영사
- 상법상 기업조직재편제도 개선방안 연구, "권재열", 법무부, ~ (2013)
- 소득세법 편제의 개선방안, "김완석", 한국조세연구원, 152~155 (2010)
- 김재문, "현행 상법상의 분할에 관한 규정 중 몇 가지 입법론", 기업법연구, 21(3), pp.233~256 (2007), 한국기업법학회
- 김재범, "M&A와 주식매수청구권에 관련된 문제점", 상사법연구, 32(2), pp.53~82 (2013), 한국상사법학회
- 노혁준, "프랑스의 회사분할 법제에 관한 연구: 분할의 효력을 중심으로", 법제연구, (39), pp.417~447 (2010), 한국법제연구원
- 노혁준, "회사분할의 제 문제" (2013), 소화
- 박태현, "분할의 유형에 따른 법적 쟁점", BFL, (38) (2009)
- 법제처, "알기 쉬운 법령정비기준" (2009), 법제처
- 송옥렬, "상법강의" (2015)
- 이철송, "회사법강의" (2015), 박영사
- 임재연, "회사법 II" (2014), 박영사
- 최준선, (2015), 삼영사
- 한국상장회사협의회, "상장법인의 기업조직재편 현황", 상장, (442) (2011), 한국상장회사협의회
- 한국상장회사협의회, "상장법인의 합병⋅분할 현황과 시사점", 상장협 ISSUE PAPER, 11 (2013)
- 황남석, "미국 회사법상의 회사분할제도에 관한 연구", 증권법연구, 12(3), pp.261~298 (2011), 한국증권법학회
- 神田秀樹, "会社法" (2013), 弘文堂
- Kallmeyer, Harald, "Umwandlungsgesetz" (2013)
- Lutter, Marcus, "Umwandlungsgesetz" (2009)
- Sagasser, Bernd, "Umwandlungen" (2011)
- Windbichler, Christine, "Gesellschaftsrecht" (2013)
- Fleischer, Victor, "Regulatory Arbitrage", Tex. L. rev, 89(227) (2010)
- Charvériat, Anne, "Sociétés Commerciales", 45eéd (2013)
- Habersack, Mathias, "Europäisches Gesellschaftsrecht" (2006)
