본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

법인과 조세제도

Tax System for Legal Entity

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Abstract

The Government submitted the amendment draft of Commercial Law in 2008 to introduce Limited Partnership and Limited Liability Company. This is for the respond to the changing economic circumstances and the needs of new corporate entities which fit for the small company especially. On the other hand, the Partnership Taxation which will become effective on Jan. 1, 2009 was introduced to the tax law. The traditional structure for taxing income divides into two main classes - the individual income tax and the corporate income tax. The individual income tax is one level of tax, and the corporate income tax is two levels of tax. The traditional explanation for the original adoption of a corporate income tax is that developments in entity theory led Congress to consider the corporation, but not the partnership, as a taxpayer or "entity" separate from its owners. However, entity theory is not fit for the taxing income earned by legal entity. The main reason for taxing income earned by legal entity is the convenience. That is, the corporate income tax was thought to be a necessary mechanism for enforcing a comprehensive scheme of individual income taxation conveniently. Therefore, entity theory should be abandoned in the income taxation. Thus, Introduction of partnership taxation system is a landmark in the history of our income taxation system. This responds to the change of economic environment. A partnership serves as an conduit between a business and its owners, so the partnership entity is not taxed directly. However, that partnership taxation was introduced in the special tax treatment control law does not suit the taxation system because a pass-through taxation system is always not profitable for the partners. The main reason the conduit theory was adopted in the income tax law is taxing partners of entity like partnership under civil law directly in the economic substance. So, partnership taxation should be prescribed in the individual income tax law and corporate income tax law.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. 국세청, "2008년 국세통계연보", ~ (2008)
  2. 김진수, "파트너십 과세제도에 관한 연구" (2004), 한국조세연구원
  3. 김재진, "파트너쉽과세제도", 기업과세제도 선진화 관련 공청회 (2004), 한국조세연구원
  4. 박훈, "파트너십 과세제도 도입에 대비한 공동사업과세의개선방안- 민법상 조합을 중심으로 -", 세무학연구, 25(1), pp.75~112 (2008), 한국세무학회
  5. 법무부, "보도자료", ~ (2006)
  6. 안종석, "파트너십과세제도에 대한 소고-경제학자의 관점에서", 재정포럼 (2007), 한국조세연구원
  7. 안종석, "파트너십과세제도 도입방안" (2007), 한국조세연구원
  8. 이은미, "외국파트너쉽에 대한 과세-외국사업체의 세법상 분류를 중심으로-", 조세학술논집, 23(1), pp.119~153 (2007), 한국국제조세협회
  9. 이창희, "세법강의" (2008), 박영사
  10. 임승순, "조세법" (2007), 박영사
  11. 재정경제부, "2008년 간추린 개정세법", ~ (2008)
  12. 최기원, "상법학원론" (2008), 박영사
  13. 최진이, "새로운 共同企業 類型의 導入에 관한 硏究- 유한책임회사를 중심으로 -", 기업법연구, 22(2), pp.79~101 (2008), 한국기업법학회
  14. 황인경, "인적회사의 과세방안―파트너십 방식과 S corporation 방식의비교검토를 통한 입법안―", 조세법연구, 11(1), pp.104~155 (2005), 한국세법학회
  15. Alvin Warren, "Would a Consumption Tax Be Fairer Than an Income Tax?", Yale L. J., 89 (1980)
  16. Boris I. Bittker, "Federal Income Taxation of Individuals 3rd Edition" (2002), RIA
  17. Kelly Luttrell, "Integrated Business Data", ~ (2003)
  18. Robert Carroll, "Fiscal Fact No.143" (2008), Tax Foundation

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)