‘대상’ 개념에 대한 비판적 일고찰
A Critical Study on the Concept of 'Object'
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study searches for a precise meaning of 'object,' which is in general use as an important concept in the study of language. We first look into some instances of misunderstanding that have characterized previous definitions of the term, Dictionary definitions are also reviewed which strike one as problematic. In an attempt to grasp the precise meaning of 'object,' two concepts of the term are examined: first, whether to treat 'object' as a reality of the external or subjective consciousness of the inner substance; second, how to define the direction of the object. Object is suggestive of the subjective consciousness of the inner realities as well as the external ones. Furthermore, the objectivity of the consciousness and external realities are grounded in different meanings. In terms of directionality of the object, the direction of 'object to subject' as well as 'subject to object should be considered. Therefore, relationship between the subject and the object can be presupposed to be bidirectional.
Abstract
This study searches for a precise meaning of 'object,' which is in general use as an important concept in the study of language. We first look into some instances of misunderstanding that have characterized previous definitions of the term, Dictionary definitions are also reviewed which strike one as problematic. In an attempt to grasp the precise meaning of 'object,' two concepts of the term are examined: first, whether to treat 'object' as a reality of the external or subjective consciousness of the inner substance; second, how to define the direction of the object. Object is suggestive of the subjective consciousness of the inner realities as well as the external ones. Furthermore, the objectivity of the consciousness and external realities are grounded in different meanings. In terms of directionality of the object, the direction of 'object to subject' as well as 'subject to object should be considered. Therefore, relationship between the subject and the object can be presupposed to be bidirectional.
참고문헌 (22)
- 김현권, "세종 용언전자사전의 의미역 기술체계 및 목록", 한국정보과학회 언어공학연구회 학술발표 논문집, pp.319~325 (2001), 한국정보과학회 언어공학연구회
- 남기심, "국어 조사의 용법(‘-에’와 ‘-로’를 중심으로)" (1993), 박이정
- 박영식, "서양철학사의 이해" (2000), 철학과현실사
- 박진호, "통사적 결합 관계와 논항구조", 석사, pp.1994
- 사무엘 E. 스텀프, "서양철학사" (1991), 종로서적
- 스털링 P. 렘프레히트, "서양 철학사" (1992), 을유문화사
- 이병기, "‘대상성’ 논의와 역사적 가설, In 학여와 함께하는 국어학", pp.341~360 (2009), 태학사
- 이선웅, "국어 명사의 논항구조 연구" (2005), 월인
- 임홍빈, "명사화의 의미 특성에 대하여", 국어학, 2, pp.83~104 (1974), 국어학회
- 임홍빈, "副詞化와 對象性", 국어학, 4, pp.39~60 (1976), 국어학회
- 임홍빈, "선어말 {-거-}와 대상성", 논문집, 11, pp.23~40 (1977), 국민대학교
- 임홍빈, "{-겠-}과 대상성", 한글, 170, pp.587~630 (1980), 한글학회
- 임홍빈, "국어 명사구와 조사구의 통사 구조에 대하여", 冠嶽語文硏究, 24, pp.1~62 (1999), 서울대학교 국어국문학과
- 장 폴 사르트르(Jean Paul Sartre), "존재와 무" (2005), 살림
- 정태구, "논항구조와 영어통사론" (2001), 한국문화사
- 찰스 필모어(Fillmore, C. J.), "격문법이란 무엇인가" (1987), 을유문화사
- 최호철, "국어의 의미격 설정에 대하여", 한글, 232, pp.123~146 (1996), 한글학회
- 최호철, "학위 논문의 국어 의미 연구 경향" (2005), 월인
- Chomsky, N, "Lectures on Government and Binding" (1981), Foris Publications
- Fillmore, C. J, "The Case for Case, In Universals in Linguistic Theory" (1968), Holt, Rinehart & Winston
- Fillmore, C. J, "Some Problems for Case Grammar", Monograph Series on Language and Linguistics, 24 (1971)
- Haegeman, L, "Introduction to Government and Binding Theory" (1991), Blackwell