본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

개화기 문체의 시작과 변화: 서유견문과 신찬초등소학을 중심으로

The Beginning and the Transition of the Writing Style in the Time of Enlightenment: Seo-Yu-Kyun-Mun and Shin-Chan-Cho-Deung-So-Hak

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

This paper studies the 19th century writing in Korea, how it began and transformed. At the end of 19th century, Korean society experienced diverse changes in its traditions. Traditional ideals, life style and the world view were shaken by new ideals and perspectives during the enlightenment period which today is called the ‘Gaehwagi’. The writing also was effected by these subsequent changes. Before Gaehwagi, Korean sentences were written in Chinse characters. Educated people used only Chinese characters to express their thoughts and opinions. However, following the Gaehwagi, Hangul (Korean alphabet) and Chinese characters were used together. But soon after the problem became apparent with the general public in that they were not educated well enough to employ both the Chinese characters and Hangul in the same sentences, it was a new writing style they had never experienced. The paper addresses the question of how the new writing style became a ‘norm’ following the Gaehwagi by comparing the Seo-Yu-Kyun-Mun (1895) and the Shin-Chan-Cho-Deung-So-Hak (1909). Historically Seo-Yu-Kyun-Mun used Hangul almost for the first time in what may be defined as a formal writing, while Shin-Chan-Cho-Deung-So-Hak was used as a manual to teach the general public. In Seo-Yu-Kyun-Mun one finds that the use of Chinese characters and Hangul was successfully negotiated as one dialect, and even though the use of Hangul was somewhat restrictive, we can evaluate it as being the stepping stone for the new writing style. Shin-Chan-Cho-Deung-So-Hak showed progress from Seo-Yu-Kyun-Mun in terms of the usage of Hangul. In Shin-Chan-Cho-Deung-So-Hak, Hangul was used to express the substantial morpheme in addition to the grammatical morpheme. And since it used only Hangul in some sentences and paragraphs, one can assume that the usage of Hangul had been generalized to some degree at that time. Though traditional long-descriptive minuscule writing style was also going through changes, the use of paragraph became more apparent in the Shin-Chan-Cho-Deung-So-Hak, compared to the Seo-Yu-Kyun-Mun.

Abstract

This paper studies the 19th century writing in Korea, how it began and transformed. At the end of 19th century, Korean society experienced diverse changes in its traditions. Traditional ideals, life style and the world view were shaken by new ideals and perspectives during the enlightenment period which today is called the ‘Gaehwagi’. The writing also was effected by these subsequent changes. Before Gaehwagi, Korean sentences were written in Chinse characters. Educated people used only Chinese characters to express their thoughts and opinions. However, following the Gaehwagi, Hangul (Korean alphabet) and Chinese characters were used together. But soon after the problem became apparent with the general public in that they were not educated well enough to employ both the Chinese characters and Hangul in the same sentences, it was a new writing style they had never experienced. The paper addresses the question of how the new writing style became a ‘norm’ following the Gaehwagi by comparing the Seo-Yu-Kyun-Mun (1895) and the Shin-Chan-Cho-Deung-So-Hak (1909). Historically Seo-Yu-Kyun-Mun used Hangul almost for the first time in what may be defined as a formal writing, while Shin-Chan-Cho-Deung-So-Hak was used as a manual to teach the general public. In Seo-Yu-Kyun-Mun one finds that the use of Chinese characters and Hangul was successfully negotiated as one dialect, and even though the use of Hangul was somewhat restrictive, we can evaluate it as being the stepping stone for the new writing style. Shin-Chan-Cho-Deung-So-Hak showed progress from Seo-Yu-Kyun-Mun in terms of the usage of Hangul. In Shin-Chan-Cho-Deung-So-Hak, Hangul was used to express the substantial morpheme in addition to the grammatical morpheme. And since it used only Hangul in some sentences and paragraphs, one can assume that the usage of Hangul had been generalized to some degree at that time. Though traditional long-descriptive minuscule writing style was also going through changes, the use of paragraph became more apparent in the Shin-Chan-Cho-Deung-So-Hak, compared to the Seo-Yu-Kyun-Mun.

참고문헌 (15)

  1. 김상대, "중세국어 구결문의 국어학적 연구" (1985), 한신문화사
  2. 김종택, "한글은 문자 구실을 어떻게 해 왔나", 건대어문학, 9(10), pp.859~868 (1985)
  3. 김주필, "‘한글’(명칭) 사용의 시공간적 배경과 특징", 반교어문학회 제141차 정기학술발표회, pp.19~39 (2013)
  4. 민현식, "개화기 국어 문체 연구", pp.110~112 (1994), 국어국문학
  5. 민현식, "개화기 국어 문체에 대한 종합적 연구 (1)", 국어교육, 83, pp.113~152 (1994)
  6. 민현식, "개화기 국어 문법, In 국어의 시대별 변천 연구 4 -개화기 국어-" (1999), 국립국어연구원
  7. 심재기, "개화기의 교과서 문체에 대하여", 국어국문학, 107, pp.71~86 (1992)
  8. 안용환, "유길준의 개화사상과 대외인식에 관한 연구", 박사, 사학, pp.2009
  9. 이기문, "개화기의 국문연구" (1970), 한국문화연구소
  10. 이석주, "기사 문장의 변천, In 신문기사의 문체" (1990), 한국언론연구원
  11. 이현우, "교과서의 문장 실태", 새국어생활, 9(4), pp.17~28 (1999)
  12. 백봉희, "현채의 저술과 시대의식 -유년필독과 신찬초등소학을 중심으로-", 석사, pp.2000
  13. 채훈, "서유견문" (2003), 명문당
  14. 최석재, "현대국어의 형성과 변천." (2000), 박이정
  15. 홍종선, "개화기 교과서의 문장과 종결어미", 한국학연구, 6, pp.181~211 (1994)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)