본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

콩트 다시 쓰기: 스트라파롤라의 「돼지 왕」과 마담 도누와의 「멧돼지 왕자」를 중심으로

Rewriting the Tale: Straparola's The Pig King and Madame d’Aulnoy's Prince Marcassin

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

Prince Marcassin Madame d'Aulnoy's variant of Straparola's The Pig King may seem like a simple repetition or an imitation, but one should also take into consideration that these works though simple they may seem are representations of the ideals of an era. The act of rewriting, especially concerning fairy tales, should be taken seriously since it may even effect future ideals as this study will demonstrate. This study will examine and compare Straparola’s The Pig King from the Renaissance period and Madame D’Aulnoy’s Prince Marcassin from the seventeenth-century France. The object of this study is to analyze the sociocultural basis represented in the two texts aforementioned by comparing the similarities and the differences. Both texts are based on the representation of a figure who is mocked by everyone till he eventually accepts the transformational process through which he attains the status of an actual Hero. The theme of metamorphosis was a common topic in classical writings and largely replaced religious and mythic themes. Straparola utilizes the topic of metamorphosis in his writing to liberate his society from the grips of religion, while Madame d'Aulnoy uses it as an escape valve from the standardized social order of the 17th century. Madame d'Aulnoy’s narratives are based on causality representing the needs of the readers of the period while Straparola’s narratives tries to exclude the causality if possible. Difference in the two narratives denote the different sociocultural environment in which the texts were formed and written. Madame d'Aulnoy’s readers dreamed of a society free from the dominant monarchy, and Madame d'Aulnoy’s Prince Marcassin which is a fictional history addressed these very needs of the readers. While Prince Marcassin addressed the issues concerning rationality as an ideal, The Pig King remained as simple wonderful stories. In this sense, both authors are representative of their respective era and though very different is very much alike.

Abstract

Prince Marcassin Madame d'Aulnoy's variant of Straparola's The Pig King may seem like a simple repetition or an imitation, but one should also take into consideration that these works though simple they may seem are representations of the ideals of an era. The act of rewriting, especially concerning fairy tales, should be taken seriously since it may even effect future ideals as this study will demonstrate. This study will examine and compare Straparola’s The Pig King from the Renaissance period and Madame D’Aulnoy’s Prince Marcassin from the seventeenth-century France. The object of this study is to analyze the sociocultural basis represented in the two texts aforementioned by comparing the similarities and the differences. Both texts are based on the representation of a figure who is mocked by everyone till he eventually accepts the transformational process through which he attains the status of an actual Hero. The theme of metamorphosis was a common topic in classical writings and largely replaced religious and mythic themes. Straparola utilizes the topic of metamorphosis in his writing to liberate his society from the grips of religion, while Madame d'Aulnoy uses it as an escape valve from the standardized social order of the 17th century. Madame d'Aulnoy’s narratives are based on causality representing the needs of the readers of the period while Straparola’s narratives tries to exclude the causality if possible. Difference in the two narratives denote the different sociocultural environment in which the texts were formed and written. Madame d'Aulnoy’s readers dreamed of a society free from the dominant monarchy, and Madame d'Aulnoy’s Prince Marcassin which is a fictional history addressed these very needs of the readers. While Prince Marcassin addressed the issues concerning rationality as an ideal, The Pig King remained as simple wonderful stories. In this sense, both authors are representative of their respective era and though very different is very much alike.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. Straparole, Ian Francois., "Les Facecievses nvictz", Lyon
  2. Madame d'Aulnoy., "Le Prince marcassin." Nouveau cabinet des fées 5: La Suite des "fées à la mode", pp.295~355, Slatkine
  3. 단테 알리기에리, "신곡: 지옥 , 신곡 : 연옥 , 신곡: 천국" (2009), 열린책들
  4. 보카치오, 조반니, "데카메론 1, 2, 3" (2012), 민음사
  5. 샤르티에, 로제, "사생활의 역사: 르네상스부터 계몽주의까지" (2003), 새물결
  6. 페트라르카, 프란체스코, "칸초니에레" (2005), 나남출판
  7. 한용택, "페로에서 바르톡까지, 동화콘텐츠로서 ‘푸른 수염’모티프 읽기", 동화와 번역, (17), pp.385~482 (2009), 동화와번역연구소
  8. 호메로스, "오뒷세이아" (2012), 숲
  9. Belmont, Nicole., "Mythe, conte et enfance : Les écritures d'Orphée et de Cendrillon" (2010), L'Harmattan
  10. Belmont, Nicole., "Poétique du conte : Essai sur le conte de tradition orale" (1999), Editions Gallimard
  11. Compagnon, Antoine., "La seconde main: ou le travail de la citation" (1979), Seuil
  12. Genette, Gérard., "Palimpsestes: La littérature au second degré" (1982), Seuil
  13. Hazard, Paul, "La Crise de la conscience européenne: 1680-1715" (1994), Le Livre de Poche
  14. Heidmann, Ute. Adam, "Textualité et intertextualité des contes" (2010), Classiques Garnier
  15. Jomand-Baudry, "Le Conte merveilleux au XVIIIe siècle:Une poétique expérimental" (2002), Editions Kimé
  16. Propp, Vladimir., "Les racines historiques du conte merveilleux" (1983), Gallimard
  17. Straparole., "Jean Louveau et Pierre de Larivey" (1857), Imprimé par E. Thunot et Cie Chez Pierre Jannet, Libraire
  18. Tritter, Jean-Louis., "Le conte philosophique" (2008), Ellipses

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)