본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

정신분석 수련(Psychoanalysis Training)이 정신과 임상에 어떤 영향을 미칠 것인가?

What Difference Does Psychoanalysis Training Make in Psychiatric Clinical Practice?

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Psychiatrists must learn and experience various fields of psychiatric medicine and sciences in order to be able to comprehensively understand the human mind and pathological mental phenomena. Without this all-encompassing expertise, they will not be able to adequately treat and prevent psychiatric illnesses in terms of neurobiology, psychodynamic psychiatry, and socio-cultural psychiatry. I insist that psychodynamic psychiatry, which is a requirement for psychiatrists to learn and practice during clinical work, must be included as an essential part of resident training for psychiatrists. I wonder however, whether the current training curriculum for psychiatric residents is sufficient for imparting the understanding and experience of psychodynamic psychiatry. Currently, there is an increasing need for training in psychodynamic psychiatry among psychiatric clinicians and psychiatric residents since they recognize that psychodynamic approaches should be applied in order for them to better understand and treat psychiatric illnesses more effectively. By reflecting on the changes in my own identity and clinical practice after being trained in psychoanalysis, I have tried to identify the difference that training in psychoanalysis makes in the clinical practice of psychiatrists and its influence on their personal and professional life. In conclusion, I want to emphasize that training in psychodynamic

Abstract

Psychiatrists must learn and experience various fields of psychiatric medicine and sciences in order to be able to comprehensively understand the human mind and pathological mental phenomena. Without this all-encompassing expertise, they will not be able to adequately treat and prevent psychiatric illnesses in terms of neurobiology, psychodynamic psychiatry, and socio-cultural psychiatry. I insist that psychodynamic psychiatry, which is a requirement for psychiatrists to learn and practice during clinical work, must be included as an essential part of resident training for psychiatrists. I wonder however, whether the current training curriculum for psychiatric residents is sufficient for imparting the understanding and experience of psychodynamic psychiatry. Currently, there is an increasing need for training in psychodynamic psychiatry among psychiatric clinicians and psychiatric residents since they recognize that psychodynamic approaches should be applied in order for them to better understand and treat psychiatric illnesses more effectively. By reflecting on the changes in my own identity and clinical practice after being trained in psychoanalysis, I have tried to identify the difference that training in psychoanalysis makes in the clinical practice of psychiatrists and its influence on their personal and professional life. In conclusion, I want to emphasize that training in psychodynamic

참고문헌 (5)

  1. "Standard for education and training in psychoanalysis" (2015)[URL]
  2. 반건호, "불안 및 공포의 발달: 정신분석부터 신경생물학적 접근까지", 정신분석, 25(2), pp.54~64 (2014), 한국정신분석학회
  3. Gabbard GO, "Psychodynamic psychiatry in clinical practice", pp.21~23 (2005), American Psychoanalytic publishing
  4. Michels R, "The future of psychoanalysis", Psychoanal Q, 57, pp.167~185 (1988)
  5. 유재학, "Expected Promising Future of Psychoanalysis in Korea", 정신분석, 26(3), pp.75~81 (2015), 한국정신분석학회[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (2건)