정신건강의학과 수련교육의 질과 임상역량에 대한 전공의와 전문의의 인식도 조사
A Recognition Survey by Psychiatry Residents and Psychiatrists Regarding the Quality of Residency Training and Clinical Competence in Korea
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
Objectives This study surveyed the quality of the residency training program and clinical competence of Korean psychiatry residents and psychiatrists Methods Questionnaires regarding the quality of residency training and clinical competence were administered to Korean psychiatry residents (n=102) and psychiatrists (n=157). The authors analyzed the quality of training education according to the training environment and the correlation between the quality of training and the self-assessment competence level. Results The average score of the quality of training evaluated by the residents (n=102) was 3.57 (±1.00). Groups with more than or equal to three residents (annual) scored higher (3.69±1.03) than the groups with less than or equal to two residents (3.52±0.99). Groups with more than or equal to seven teaching psychiatrists scored higher (3.42±1.03) than the groups with less than or equal to six teaching psychiatrists (3.42±1.03). The quality of training and self-assessment competence showed a significant static correlation in the residents (R2=0.488, p<0.01) and psychiatrists (R2=0.508, p<0.01). Conclusion This study shows that the quality of residency education varies according to the clinical area and the environment. The importance of training education is emphasized by the static correlation between the quality of education and clinical competence.
Abstract
Objectives This study surveyed the quality of the residency training program and clinical competence of Korean psychiatry residents and psychiatrists Methods Questionnaires regarding the quality of residency training and clinical competence were administered to Korean psychiatry residents (n=102) and psychiatrists (n=157). The authors analyzed the quality of training education according to the training environment and the correlation between the quality of training and the self-assessment competence level. Results The average score of the quality of training evaluated by the residents (n=102) was 3.57 (±1.00). Groups with more than or equal to three residents (annual) scored higher (3.69±1.03) than the groups with less than or equal to two residents (3.52±0.99). Groups with more than or equal to seven teaching psychiatrists scored higher (3.42±1.03) than the groups with less than or equal to six teaching psychiatrists (3.42±1.03). The quality of training and self-assessment competence showed a significant static correlation in the residents (R2=0.488, p<0.01) and psychiatrists (R2=0.508, p<0.01). Conclusion This study shows that the quality of residency education varies according to the clinical area and the environment. The importance of training education is emphasized by the static correlation between the quality of education and clinical competence.
참고문헌 (10)
- 김새롬, "한국 전공의들의 근무환경, 건강, 인식된 환자안전: 2014 전공의 근무환경조사", 보건사회연구, 35(2), pp.584~607 (2015), 한국보건사회연구원[DOI]
- 임기영, "우리나라 전공의 교육 및 관련 인증기관에 대한 통합적관리계획", 의학교육논단, 20(3), pp.123~127 (2018), 연세대학교 의과대학[DOI]
- 견영기, "정신건강의학과의 역량 중심 전공의 수련과정 개발", 의학교육논단, 20(1), pp.51~59 (2018), 연세대학교 의과대학[DOI]
- "Partial amendments of the annual training course for residents" (2019)[URL]
- Morrison J, "ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: evaluation", BMJ, 326, pp.385~387 (2003)
- Lee SW, "Current status and implications of the accreditation system for residency training institutions in the U.S", Research Institute for Healthcare Policy Korean Medical Association, 10, pp.50~54 (2012)
- 이찬희, "외래 초진환자의 만족진료시간과 관련 추가 비용 지불 의사", 보건행정학회지, 27(1), pp.39~46 (2017), 한국보건행정학회
- Kim JS, "Concepts of latent curriculum", The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 2, pp.29~54 (1975)
- 김지훈, "우리나라 정신건강의학과 전공의의 수련 실태 설문 조사", 신경정신의학, 58(3), pp.216~229 (2019), 대한신경정신의학회[DOI]
- Presser S, "The measurement of a middle position in attitude surveys", Public Opin Q, 44, pp.70~85 (1980)